Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

2 361

Доступно статей:

3 493 662

 

Cambridge University Press по журналам "Archaeological Dialogues"

Отсортировать по: Порядок: Результаты:

  • Nevett Lisa (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 1999-12-01)
    The subject of Gerritsen's paper and the way in which it is presented invite comment on three main aspects: firstly, his theoretical stance, secondly the methodology he uses and thirdly, his conclusions regarding the ...
  • Voutsaki Sofia (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 2010-06-01)
    This paper offers a critical evaluation of the debate on agency and personhood in archaeology. Despite some very interesting and sharp discussions, the debate has suffered from the projection of anachronistic definitions ...
  • Gerritsen Fokke (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 1999-12-01)
    Nevett, Sharples and Vellinga have commented on my paper in a heartening and inspiring way, and I would like to thank them for their comments of agreement as well as for the points of criticism that they raise. In my reply ...
  • Hall Martin (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 2008-12-01)
    Jane Webster has made an eloquent and compelling case for writing slavery – and other forms of unfree labour – back into the historiography of the Roman world. Her argument weaves together questions of the nature of evidence, ...
  • van Wijngaarden Gert-Jan (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 1999-07-01)
    Value is one of the concepts which are of importance in the way people structure their material surroundings. According to the philosophy of Georg Simmel, value finds its origins in the tension between the desire for objects ...
  • Johnston Robert (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 1998-07-01)
    This paper is a review of recent academic debate dealing with the relationship between perception and landscape. It is suggested that there are two ways in which the perception of landscape is considered: the explicit and ...
  • Wright James (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 2010-06-01)
    In the brief space allotted for a comment, with respect to the theoretical discussion I will say only that I find the argument insufficiently developed and would rather that Voutsaki had paid closer attention to Dornan's ...
  • Annis M. Beatrice (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 1996-12-01)
    In his paper Peter Odermatt takes the local inhabitants and their right to (re)presentation and appropriation of the monumental heritage under protection against the hegemonistic pretension of the Authority – scientific, ...
  • Harrison Rodney (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 2011-12-01)
    I thank the commentators for their thoughtful and articulate responses, in which they have quite rightly exposed several inconsistencies and queried or expanded on a number of points that I did not have the time or space ...
  • Graves-Brown Paul (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 2011-12-01)
    I find myself largely in sympathy with what Rodney Harrison is trying to do. In applying an archaeological sensibility to the contemporary world, it becomes increasingly clear that the habitual tropes of archaeological ...
  • Nilsson Björn (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 2011-04-01)
    In trying to understand why archaeology is so strongly associated with the method of excavation, this paper examines different relationships between excavation, archaeology, archaeologists and modern society.
  • Grima Reuben (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 2002-12-01)
    Among the influences that have altered the nature of archaeology over the past two decades, two major trends are singled out for discussion here. The first is the emerging interest in understanding the subjective experiences ...
  • Lemaire Ton (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 1997-05-01)
    Car j'ai découvert une grande vérité. A savoir que les hommes habitent, et que le sens des choses change pour eux selon le sens de la maison. Et que le chemin, le champ d'orge et la courbe de la colline sont différents ...
  • Roymans Nico (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 1995-01-01)
    I wish to thank Barbara Bender, Aron Gurevich and Ton Lemaire for reviewing my contribution and for making critical comments on the ideas put forward in it. I should like to take this opportunity to comment briefly on the ...
  • Неизвестный автор (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 2009-06-01)
  • Неизвестный автор (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 2009-12-01)
  • Неизвестный автор (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 2010-06-01)
  • Неизвестный автор (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 2010-12-01)
  • Неизвестный автор (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 2011-04-01)
  • Неизвестный автор (Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK, 2011-12-01)