<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Annual Reviews</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2</id>
<updated>2026-08-05T00:57:57Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-08-05T00:57:57Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Problems and Prospects in the Study of Physician-Patient Interaction: 30 Years of Research</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/24567" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name/>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/24567</id>
<updated>2020-10-12T15:57:17Z</updated>
<summary type="text">Problems and Prospects in the Study of Physician-Patient Interaction: 30 Years of Research
Working within the functionalist perspective that he did so much to develop, Parsons (1951) conceptualized the physician-patient relationship according to a normative framework defined by the pattern variable scheme. As Parsons clearly recognized, this normative conceptualization was one that empirical reality at best only approximates. In the 1970s, two major studies established doctor-patient interaction as a viable research domain. In the present review, we consider approaches to the medical interview developing from these initiatives and that have a primary focus on observable features of doctor-patient interaction. Within this orientation, we consider literature dealing with social, moral, and technical dilemmas that physicians and patients face in primary care and the resources that they deploy in solving them. This literature embodies a steady evolution away from a doctor-centered emphasis toward a more balanced focus on the conduct of doctors and patients together.
</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Estimating the Causal Effect of Social Capital: A Review of Recent Research</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/24565" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name/>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/24565</id>
<updated>2020-10-12T15:57:17Z</updated>
<summary type="text">Estimating the Causal Effect of Social Capital: A Review of Recent Research
Although there is a large literature on social capital, empirical estimates of the effect of social capital may be biased because of social homophily, the tendency of similar people to become friends with each other. Despite the methodological difficulties, a recent literature has emerged across several different disciplines that tries to estimate the causal effect of social capital. This paper reviews this recent empirical literature on social capital, paying close attention to the statistical and theoretical assumptions involved. Overall, there is evidence that genuine progress has been made in estimating the effect of social capital. The reviewed articles should provide useful examples for future research.
</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Organizational Restructuring and its Consequences: Rhetorical and Structural</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/24564" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name/>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/24564</id>
<updated>2020-10-12T15:57:17Z</updated>
<summary type="text">Organizational Restructuring and its Consequences: Rhetorical and Structural
In this review, we examine the idea of organizational restructuring as a conceptual tool and how it has been used to alter societal definitions and interpretations of employment. Although use of the term restructuring is relatively recent, the broad issue of changing employment conditions with which it is concerned has a long history, going back to the industrial revolution. Our main focus is a consideration of the causes and consequences of restructuring, in its more recent rhetorical and structural versions. In their pursuit of greater efficiencies, organizations adapt to the demands of increasingly global markets, and these adaptations are crucial components of what is popularly referred to as the new economy. Such developments are applauded in most economic theory, but sociologists examine both sides of their social impact, including the adverse effects and implications of such externalities as the social disruptions caused by downsizing and other organizational and corporate changes. These studies provide important contributions to our knowledge of how much, and when, promises of organizational efficiency are in fact deliverable and responsive to those affected by them. We argue that the language of restructuring is regularly used to mask, reframe, and sugarcoat economic slumps as possessing positive social outcomes. We conclude by positioning restructuring as an important component of the current American export of managerial ideology to transnational contexts and suggest further examination of how restructuring affects the culture of business in these other national contexts.
</summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Video Cultures: Television Sociology in the “New TV” Age</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/24566" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name/>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/24566</id>
<updated>2020-10-12T15:57:17Z</updated>
<summary type="text">Video Cultures: Television Sociology in the “New TV” Age
We argue that the most significant and influential research on television over the past five decades positions the medium as a key site for addressing the complex interrelationship between culture and institutional/organizational power. Granting that such work is theoretically and methodologically diverse, we employ an organizational frame that groups political-economic approaches on the one hand and cultural approaches on the other. Political-economic approaches largely attend to issues of power at a macro level, focusing on how ownership and control of television along with the organization of television production practices shape and influence content; cultural approaches focus more on the expressive and symbolic dimensions of television programming and reception. At the same time, contemporary changes in the medium threaten to make past research on television appear quaint and anachronistic. The industry's transformation of television into continually emerging sets of multifaceted digital-interactive technologies challenges researchers to draw enduring perspectives from the older work and assess how they apply to the new-media environment. Consequently, we suggest the term “video cultures” in lieu of “television sociology” as a way of capturing future trends.
</summary>
</entry>
</feed>
