| Автор | Murphy, Russell D. |
| Дата выпуска | 2002 |
| dc.description | ▪ Abstract Politics has not always fared well in the political science literature on the cities, at least not in the United States. Since the mid-nineteenth century, a substantial literature has either decried or discounted the role of politics in urban governance. Much of the early literature, written before and just after the creation of the American Political Science Association in 1903, urged politics be banished and administration privileged as a way to remedy “one conspicuous failure of the United States … the government of cities.” Subsequent literature reinstated politics—though some claimed elected officials were simply agents of special interests or upper-class elites. The prevailing view today is that political leadership is an important, independent factor in the governing equation, although it is arguable that of late national and state administrators have been empowered at the expense of local self-rule—thus approximating, albeit by different means, the system envisioned by early municipal reformers. |
| Формат | application.pdf |
| Издатель | Annual Reviews |
| Копирайт | Annual Reviews |
| Название | POLITICS, POLITICAL SCIENCE, AND URBAN GOVERNANCE: A Literature and a Legacy |
| DOI | 10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.092801.093759 |
| Print ISSN | 1094-2939 |
| Журнал | Annual Review of Political Science |
| Том | 5 |
| Первая страница | 63 |
| Последняя страница | 85 |
| Аффилиация | Murphy, Russell D.; Department of Government, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut 06459; e-mail: rmurphy@mail.wesleyan.edu |
