| Автор | Johnston, Richard |
| Дата выпуска | 2006 |
| dc.description | ▪ Abstract Are party identifications relatively fixed features on the political landscape in the United States and elsewhere? If they are relatively fixed, do identifications move substantive issue preferences, perceptions of candidates, and perceptions of the link between candidates and issues? Early studies in the United States answered these questions in the affirmative. The track record for other systems is spotty, and each question occasioned repeated controversy in the decades since the 1960s. Much of the apparent lability and cross-national variation in party ties can be laid at the feet of measurement error, but not all. The claim that party identification moves other features on the political landscape is remarkably robust. |
| Формат | application.pdf |
| Издатель | Annual Reviews |
| Копирайт | Annual Reviews |
| Название | PARTY IDENTIFICATION: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences? |
| DOI | 10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170523 |
| Print ISSN | 1094-2939 |
| Журнал | Annual Review of Political Science |
| Том | 9 |
| Первая страница | 329 |
| Последняя страница | 351 |
| Аффилиация | Johnston, Richard; Department of Political Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z1; email: rjohnston@politics.ubc.ca |
