| dc.description |
Heart rate variability (HRV) is often analysed using short-term studies. Our objective was to compare two of them in a group of diabetic patients (reduced HRV) and in a control group. From the same 10 min surface electrocardiogram (ECG) two recordings were obtained. In one of them the whole signal was acquired through an A/D converter (post-event method). In the other (real-time method), an interface between the electrocardiograph and a parallel port of a computer was used to perform real-time processing of the ECG signal. The R–R intervals were measured after a visual validation in the post-event method. In the real-time method, the stored R–R intervals were automatically filtered. For both methods HRV indexes were calculated using the same software. The values of mean R–R intervals for each subject were almost identical regardless of the method. Accordingly, we found a high correlation between HRV indexes obtained from both methods (all Spearman values ⩾0.9441 and P < 0.0001). In addition, we found similar P values in the comparisons between the diabetic and control groups. We conclude that both methods are suitable for HRV analysis. Therefore, the selection of method can be based on other considerations such as the capability to store the ECG of the post-event method or the speed of analysis and lower cost of the real-time one. |
