| Автор | Brown, Robert D. |
| Автор | Newman, Dianna L. |
| Автор | Rivers, Linda S. |
| Дата выпуска | 1985 |
| dc.description | This investigation examined the effect contextual variables had on school board members' information needs for decisionmaking. The contextual variables included: (a) the importance of the decision, (b) the amount of conflict involved, and (c) the content of the evaluated program. A national sample of 237 school board members read simulated evaluation vignettes and indicated their information needs and sources. Importance, conflict, and content were found to be associated with board members' needs for time, information, and consultation, as well as whom they wanted to consult with and what kind of information they needed. |
| Издатель | Sage Publications |
| Название | An Exploratory Study of Contextual Factors as Influences on School Board Evaluation Information Needs for Decisionmaking |
| Тип | Research Article |
| DOI | 10.3102/01623737007004437 |
| Print ISSN | 0162-3737 |
| Журнал | Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis |
| Том | 7 |
| Первая страница | 437 |
| Последняя страница | 445 |
| Аффилиация | Brown, Robert D., University of Nebraska-Lincoln |
| Аффилиация | Newman, Dianna L., Oklahoma State University |
| Аффилиация | Rivers, Linda S., Lincoln (Nebraska) Public Schools |
| Выпуск | 4 |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Alkin, MC, R Daillak, and P White (1979). Using evaluations: Does evaluation make a difference?. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Braskamp, LA, RD Brown, and DL Newman (1978). Credibility of a local education program evaluation report: Author source and client characteristics. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 441-450. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Braskamp, LA, RD Brown, and DL Newman (1982). Studying evaluation utilization through simulations. Evaluation Review, 6(1), 114-126. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Brown, RD, LA Braskamp, and DL Newman (1978). Evaluator credibility and acceptance as a function of report styles: Do jargon and data make a difference?Evaluation Quarterly, 2, 331-341. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Brown, RD, and DL Newman (1980). Decision-making theory and utilization of evaluative information: Does sense of control affect information needs?Paper presented at the annual meeting of Evaluation Network, Memphis. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Brown, RD, DL Newman, and L Rivers (1980). Perceived need for evaluation as an influence on evaluation's impact on decision making. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2, 67-72. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Brown, RD, DL Newman, and LS Rivers (1981). A model for utilizing decision-making theory in evaluation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Evaluation Network, Austin. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Cistone, PJ (Ed.) (1975). Understanding school boards. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath & Co. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Fishbein, M, and I Ajzen (1975). Belief, attitudes, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Hood, PD (1976). The educational information market study. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Hoover, C, and J Slezak (1978). This board and superintendent defined their responsibilities. American School Board Journal, 165, 38-40. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Iannaccone, L (1975). School board research: A synthesis and projection. In PJ Cistone (Ed.), Understanding school boards. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath & Co. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Janis, IL, and L Mann (1977). Decision-making. New York: The Free Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Mecklenburger, JA (1976). Ten ways school boards are cooking their own. The American School Board Journal, 163, 29-32. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | National School Board Association (1976). How does your board decide?Updating School Board Policies, 7(10), 1-5. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Newman, DL, and RD Brown (1980). An exploratory investigation of decision-making style and locus of control as factors related to choice of school evaluation strategies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Newman, DL, RD Brown, and LA Braskamp (1980). Communication theory as a paradigm for studying evaluation use. In LA Braskamp and RD Brown (Eds.), Utilization of evaluative information. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Newman, DL, RD Brown, and M Littman (1979). Evaluator report and audience characteristics which influence the impact of evaluation reports: Does who says what to whom make a difference?CEDR Quarterly, 12, 14-18. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Newman, DL, RD Brown, LS Rivers, and RF Glock (1983). School boards' and administrators' use of evaluation information. Evaluation Review, 7(1), 110-125. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Patton, MQ (1978). Utilization-focused evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Smith, NL (1980). Evaluation utility and client involvement in accreditation studies. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2(5), 57-65. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Stecher, BM, MC Alkin, and G Flesher (1981). Patterns of information use in school level decision making. Los Angeles: UCLA Graduate School of Education, Center for Study of Evaluation. (Report No. 150). |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Thompson, P, RD Brown, and J Furgason (1981). The impact of evaluation report styles on evaluation audiences: Jargon and data do make a difference. In Evaluation Review, Vol. 5(2) (pp. 269-279).. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Vroom, VH, and AG Jago (1974). Decision making as a social process: Normative and descriptive models of leader behavior. Decision Sciences, 5, 743-769. |
