Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Smith, Nick, L.
Дата выпуска 1998
dc.description The predominant purpose of most investigative social program evaluations has been the amelioration of social problems; however, increasing client demands, shifting evaluator roles and methodological innovations have all influenced evaluators to become increasingly responsive to client interests. Concerns have been raised that evaluations cannot simultaneously emphasize both problem solutions and client responsiveness, and that to emphasize client interests is to necessarily undermine the quality of information needed to solve social problems. Three case studies are reported here to illustrate alternative ways by which evaluation practitioners have successfully balanced client responsiveness with problem solution: evaluations of a medical school curriculum in Hawaii, an industrial technology transfer program in Norway, and a fisheries employment-support program in Newfoundland.
Издатель Sage Publications
Название Designing Investigative Evaluations
Тип Journal Article
DOI 10.1177/13563899822208482
Print ISSN 1356-3890
Журнал Evaluation
Том 4
Первая страница 117
Последняя страница 129
Аффилиация Smith, Nick, L., Syracuse University
Выпуск 2
Библиографическая ссылка Ayers, T. D. (1987) ‘Stakeholders as Partners in Evaluation: A Stakeholder-Collaborative Approach’, Evaluation and Program Planning10: 263–271.
Библиографическая ссылка Brandon, P. R., M. A. Lindberg and Z. Wang (1993) ‘Involving Program Beneficiaries in the Early Stages of Evaluation: Issues of Consequential Validity and Influence’, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis15(4): 420–428.
Библиографическая ссылка Cordray, D. S. (1986) ‘Quasi-Experimental Analysis: A Mixture of Methods and Judgment’, in W. M. K. Trochim (ed.) Advances in Quasi-Experimental Design and Analysis, NDPE Vol. 31.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Библиографическая ссылка Cousins, J. B. and L. M. Earl (eds) (1995) Participatory Evaluation in Education: Studies in Evaluation Use and Organizational Learning. London: Falmer.
Библиографическая ссылка Fetterman, D. M. (1995) Empowerment Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Библиографическая ссылка Finne, H., M. Levin and T. Nilssen (1995) ‘Trailing Research: A Model for Useful Program Evaluation’, Evaluation1(1): 11–31.
Библиографическая ссылка Greene, J. C. (1990) ‘Technical Quality vs. User Responsiveness in Evaluation Practice’, Evaluation and Program Planning13: 267–274.
Библиографическая ссылка Greene, J. C. (1997) ‘Evaluation as Advocacy’, Evaluation Practice18(1): 25–35.
Библиографическая ссылка Rog, D. J. (1992) ‘The Role of Investigation in Program and Policy Development’, in N. L. Smith (ed.) Varieties of Investigative Evaluation, NDPE Vol. 56, pp. 53–62. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Библиографическая ссылка Schierer, M. A. (1997) ‘A Paradox in Planning Useful Evaluations: Participation vs. Knowledge Building?’, paper presented at the 1997 American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, California.
Библиографическая ссылка Scriven, M. (1973) ‘Goal-free Evaluation’, in E. R. House (ed.) School Evaluation: The Politics and Process, pp. 319–328. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Библиографическая ссылка Shadish, W. R. (1994) ‘Need-Based Evaluation: Good Evaluation and What You Need to Know to Do it’, Evaluation Practice15(3): 347–358.
Библиографическая ссылка Smith, N. L. (1981) ‘The Certainty of Judgments in Health Evaluations’, Evaluation and Program Planning4: 273–278.
Библиографическая ссылка Smith, N. L. (1982) ‘Levels of Evidence and Degrees of Certainty in Evaluation: A Response to Morris and Sales’, Evaluation and Program Planning5: 313–315.
Библиографическая ссылка Smith, N. L. (1986) ‘Evaluation Alternatives for Early Intervention Programs’, in L. Bickman and D. K. Weatherford (eds) Evaluating Early Intervention Programs for Severely Handicapped Children and Their Families, pp. 185–207. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed Publishers.
Библиографическая ссылка Smith, N. L. (1990) ‘Flexibility in the Evaluation of Emergent Programs’, Studies in Educational Evaluation16: 209–229.
Библиографическая ссылка Smith, N. L (ed.) (1992) Varieties of Investigative Evaluation, NDPE Vol. 56. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Библиографическая ссылка Smith, N. L. (1993) ‘Improving Evaluation Theory Through the Empirical Study of Evaluation Practice’, Evaluation Practice14(3): 237–242.
Библиографическая ссылка Smith, N. L. (1994) ‘Investigative Methods in Outcome Evaluation Studies of Psychological Interventions’, paper presented at the 1994 American Psychological Association Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, California.
Библиографическая ссылка Smith, N. L. (1997) ‘Functions of the Evaluation Proposal in Preordinate and Emergent Studies’, Evaluation Practice18(1): 17–24.
Библиографическая ссылка Smith, N. L. and D. M. Hauer (1990) ‘The Applicability of Selected Evaluation Models to Evolving Investigative Designs’, Studies in Educational Evaluation16: 489–500.
Библиографическая ссылка Stake, R. E. (1983) ‘Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation’, in G. Madaus, M. Scriven and D. Stufflebeam (eds) Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, pp. 287–310. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

Скрыть метаданые