| Автор | Floc'hlay, Beatrice |
| Автор | Plottu, Eric |
| Дата выпуска | 1998 |
| dc.description | Citizens, due to a lack of participation in public decision-making, often exercise ‘counterpower’ when a decision is taken, which can result in delaying or abandoning public projects. This could have been prevented if power and counterpower had negotiated during the decision-making process. Democratic Evaluation brings such a simultaneous exercise of power and counterpower to public decision-making. The evaluation method that we are proposing must enable a democratic type of evaluation to be made operational. Our aim is to demonstrate that the implementation of Democratic Evaluation is only conceivable when Empowerment Evaluation, Participatory Evaluation and Multicriteria Evaluation are associated and considered as stages in the same evaluation process. This constitutes what we call a ‘Model for the Operationalization of Democratic Evaluation’ (MODE). |
| Издатель | Sage Publications |
| Название | Democratic Evaluation |
| Тип | Journal Article |
| DOI | 10.1177/13563899822208590 |
| Print ISSN | 1356-3890 |
| Журнал | Evaluation |
| Том | 4 |
| Первая страница | 261 |
| Последняя страница | 277 |
| Аффилиация | Floc'hlay, Beatrice, Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Sécurité |
| Аффилиация | Plottu, Eric, University of Rennes |
| Выпуск | 3 |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Bana e Costa, C. A. (ed.) (1990) Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Conseil Scientifique de l'Evaluation (1991) L'évaluation de l'expertise à la responsabilité. Paris: la Documentation Française. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Ewald, F. (1986) L'Etat-Providence. Paris: Grasset. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Fayat, C. (1993) ‘De l'esprit de sel dans la décision. Des méthodes et des choix multicritères: un point de vue praticien’: Rennes, Centre National d'Enseignement à Distance (CNED). |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Fetterman, D. M. (1994) ‘Empowerment Evaluation’, Evaluation Practice15(1): 1–15. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Fetterman, D. M., S. J. Kaftarian and A. Wandersman (eds) (1996) Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment & Accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Floc’hlay, B. (1997) ‘Evaluation des services publics: d'une logique gestionnaire à une logique démocratique’, Revue Sciences de la Société (3): 131–145. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Gamel, C. (1991) ‘L'apport de la philosophie sociale à l'économie du bien-être: une question de procédure?’, Economies et Sociétés (4): 57–85. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Godet, M. (1991) De l'anticipation à l'action. Paris: Dunod. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Maystre, L. Y., J. Pictet and J. Simos (1994) Méthodes multicritères ELECTRE. Description, conseil, pratiques et cas d'application à la gestion environnementale. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Plottu, E. (1993) Intercommunalité: la communauté de communes. Questions et méthodes, Mémoire, Université de Rennes 1. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Plottu, Eric (1996) ‘Environnement: le principe de l'évaluation hiérarchisée’, speech to the inauguration colloquium of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 23–25 May. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of Justice. Harvard, MA: University Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Roy, Bernard (1985) Méthode multicritère d'aide à la décision. Paris: Economica. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Roy, Bernard (1990) ‘The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods’, in C. A. Bana e Costa (ed.) Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, pp. 155–183. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Stufflebeam, D. L. (1994) ‘Empowerment Evaluation, Objectivist Evaluation, and Evaluation Standards: Where The Future of Evaluation Should Not Go and Where It Needs To Go’, Evaluation Practice15: 321–338. |
