Автор |
Kilmann, Ralph, H. |
Автор |
Taylor, Vern |
Дата выпуска |
1974 |
dc.description |
This study investigated the psychological dynamics and situational factors that determine whether an individual will experience support and/or confrontation in a laboratory setting. The psychological dynamics were represented by C. G. Jung's psychological types and the situational factors were the experiential norms that manifest these psychic functions. A Contingency framework was derived to suggest the conditions that will lead to the acceptance or rejection of the laboratory experience, or to self-awareness and personal growth. The research data give reasonable evidence to this framework, and the implications of the study are given for: (1) the identification of the rejectors of particular laboratory experiences, (2) the design of different laboratories via alternative experiential norms, and (3) the intervention strategies for staff and trainers according to the laboratory setting and goals. |
Издатель |
Sage Publications |
Название |
A Contingency Approach to Laboratory Learning: Psychological Types Versus Experiential Norms |
Тип |
Journal Article |
DOI |
10.1177/001872677402700904 |
Print ISSN |
0018-7267 |
Журнал |
Human Relations |
Том |
27 |
Первая страница |
891 |
Последняя страница |
909 |
Выпуск |
9 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
BENNIS, W. G., Goals and meta-goals of laboratory training. Human relations training news, 1962, 6, (3), 1-4. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
BRADFORD, L. P., GIBB, J. R., and BENNE, K. D., T-group theory and laboratory method. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1964. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
BUROS, O. K., Personality tests and reviews, Highland Park, N.J., 1970. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
CLARK, J. V., CULBERT, S. A., and BOBELE, H. K., Mutually therapeutic perception and self-awareness under variable conditions. Journal of applied behavioral science, 1969, 5, (1), 65-72. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
COOPER, C. L., The influence of the trainer on participant change in T-Groups, Human relations, 1969, 22, (6), 515-530. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
DYER, W. G., Here-and-now data versus back-home personal concerns. In Dyer, W. G., (ed.) Modern theory and method in group training. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1972. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
HARRISON, R. & LUBIN, B., Personal style, group composition, and learning. Journal of applied behavioral science, 1965, 1, (3), 286-301. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
JUNG, C. G., Psychological types, Rutledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.London, 1923. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
MARSHALL, I. N., The four functions: a conceptual analysis. Journal of analytical psychology, 1967, 12, 1-31. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
MATHIS, A. G., Development and validation of a trainability index for laboratory training groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1955. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
MILES, M. B., Human relations training: processes and outcomes. Journal of counseling psychology, 1960, 1, 301-306. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
MYERS, I. B., Myers-Briggs type indicator, Educational Testing Survey, Princeton, N.J., 1962. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
STEELE, F., Personality and laboratory style, Journal of applied behavioral science, 1968, 4, (1), 25-45. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
STOCK, D., A survey of research on T-Groups, In Bradford, L. R., Gibb, J. R., and Benne, K. D., (eds) T-group theory and laboratory method. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1964, 395-441. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
YALOM, I. D., and LIEBERMAN, M. A., A study of encounter group casualties, Archives of general psychiatry, 1971, 25, 15-30. |