Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637


Скрыть метаданые

Автор Sauley, Kerry, S.
Автор Bedeian, Arthur, G.
Дата выпуска 1989
dc.description After a brief review of the origins of the .05 criterion for judging statistical significance, this article challenges the management discipline's rigid adherence to conventional levels of significancefor differentiating reliable from unreliable results. Arguing instead that there is no right or wrong level of significance, it contends that the selection of a significance level should be treated as one more research parameter. In this respect, the appropriateness of a specific level of significance should be based on such considerations as sample size and research design rather than a priori declarations of .05, .01, or whatever.
Издатель Sage Publications
Название .05: A Case of the Tail Wagging the Distribution
Тип Journal Article
DOI 10.1177/014920638901500209
Print ISSN 0149-2063
Журнал Journal of Management
Том 15
Первая страница 335
Последняя страница 344
Аффилиация Bedeian, Arthur, G., Louisiana State University
Выпуск 2
Библиографическая ссылка Alberoni, F. (1962a). Contribution to the study of subjective probability. I. Journal of General Psychology, 66, 241-264.
Библиографическая ссылка Alberoni, F. (1962b). Contribution to the study of subjective probability: Prediction. II. Journal of General Psychology, 66, 265-285.
Библиографическая ссылка Bakan, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-437.
Библиографическая ссылка Camilleri, S.F (1962). Theory, probability, and induction in social research. American Sociological Review, 27, 170-178.
Библиографическая ссылка Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Библиографическая ссылка Cochran, W G. (1976). Early development of techniques in comparative experimentation. In D.B. Owen (Ed.), On the history of statistics and probability (pp. 2-25). New York: Dekker.
Библиографическая ссылка Cowles, M., & Davis, C. (1982). On the origins of the .05 level of statistical significance. American Psychologist, 37, 553-558.
Библиографическая ссылка Feild, H.S., & Armenakis, A.A. (1974). On use of multiple tests of significance in psychological research. Psychological Reports, 35, 427-431.
Библиографическая ссылка Fisher, R.A. (1925). Statistical methods of research workers. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
Библиографическая ссылка Fisher, R.A. (1926). The arrangement of field experiments. Journal of the Ministry ofAgriculture, 33, 503-513.
Библиографическая ссылка Flugel, J.C. (1925). A quantitative study of feeling and emotion in everyday life. British Journal of Psychology, 15, 318-355.
Библиографическая ссылка Kelley, H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Keppel, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Библиографическая ссылка Kirk, R.E. (1978). Introductory statistics. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Библиографическая ссылка Lewis, G.H., & Lewis, J.F (1980). The dog in the night-time: Negative evidence in social research. British Journal of Sociology, 31, 544-558.
Библиографическая ссылка Lindquist, E.F (1953). Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Библиографическая ссылка Lykken, D.T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151-159.
Библиографическая ссылка McCall, W.A. (1923). How to experiment in education. New York: Macmillan.
Библиографическая ссылка McGaughy, J.R. (1924). The fiscal administration of city school systems. New York: Macmillan.
Библиографическая ссылка Morrison, D.E., & Henkel, R.E. (1969). Significance tests reconsidered. American Sociologist, 4, 131-140.
Библиографическая ссылка Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Библиографическая ссылка Peters, C.C. (1933). Note on a misconception of statistical significance. American Journal of Sociology, 39, 231-236.
Библиографическая ссылка Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
Библиографическая ссылка Rosenthal, R., & Gaito, J. (1963). The interpretation of levels of significance by psychological researchers. Journal of Psychology, 55, 33-38.
Библиографическая ссылка Rudner, R. (1953). The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments. Philosophy of Science, 20, 1-6.
Библиографическая ссылка Selvin, H.C. (1957). A critique of tests of significance in survey research. American Sociological Review, 22, 519-527.
Библиографическая ссылка Skipper, J.K., Jr., Guenther, A.L., & Nass, G. (1967). The sacredness of .05: A note concerning the uses of statistical levels of significance in social science. American Sociologist, 2, 16-18.
Библиографическая ссылка Student [Gossett, W. S.]. (1908). The probable error of a mean. Biometrika, 6, 1-25.
Библиографическая ссылка Venn, J. (1888). Cambridge anthropometry. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 18, 140-154.
Библиографическая ссылка Walker, H.M. (1931). Studies in the history of statistical method. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Библиографическая ссылка Winer, B .J. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Библиографическая ссылка Wood, T.B., & Stratton, F.J.M. (1910). The interpretatin of experimental results. Journal of Agriculture Science, 3, 417-440.
Библиографическая ссылка Yule, G.U., & Kendall, M.G. (1950). An introduction to the theory of statistics (14th ed.). London: Griffin.

Скрыть метаданые