Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Mann, Leon
Автор Samson, Danny
Автор Dow, Douglas
Дата выпуска 1998
dc.description The effectiveness of internal benchmarking and goal-setting is examined in a field experiment carried out in an electrical products distribution company. The experiment involves a pre-post experimental design in which 138 branches of the company are assigned randomly to one of four conditions: (a) benchmarking; (b) “small-wins” goal-setting; (c) “big-bang” goal-setting; and (d) control group. The dependent variable is percentage increase in sales performance over a four month period. The findings point to the effectiveness of benchmarking for achieving improved performance and suggest that comparison against partners and knowledge about “best practice” contributes, together with goal-setting and goal-evaluation, to the efficacy of benchmarking.
Издатель Sage Publications
Название A Field Experiment on the Effects of Benchmarking and Goal Setting on Company Sales Performance
Тип Journal Article
DOI 10.1177/014920639802400106
Print ISSN 0149-2063
Журнал Journal of Management
Том 24
Первая страница 73
Последняя страница 96
Аффилиация Dow, Douglas, University of Melbourne
Выпуск 1
Библиографическая ссылка Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1): 74–94.
Библиографическая ссылка Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership. 3rd Edition. NY: Free Press
Библиографическая ссылка Boston Consulting Group. 1994. Leading the Way: A study of best manufacturing practices in Australia and New Zealand. 2nd Edition. Melbourne: Australian Manufacturing Council
Библиографическая ссылка Buller, P.F. & Bell, C.H. Jr. (1986). Effects of team building and goal setting on productivity: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29: 305–328.
Библиографическая ссылка Camp, R.C. (1989). Benchmarking: The search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. Milwaukee, Wl, Quality Press-American Society for Quality Control.
Библиографическая ссылка Cooper, M.D., Phillips, R.A., Sutherland, V.J. & Makin, P.J. (1994). Reducing accidents using goal setting and feedback: A field study. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 67: 219-240.
Библиографическая ссылка Fitzpatrick, M. & Huczynski, A. (1990). Applying the benchmarking approach to absence control. Leadership & Organization Development, 11 (5): 22–26.
Библиографическая ссылка Ettlie, J.E. & Johnson, M.D. (1994). Product development benchmarking versus customer locus in applications of quality function deployment. Marketing Letters, 5(2): 107–116.
Библиографическая ссылка Foster, T.O. (1992). Logistics benchmarking: Searching for the best. Distribution, 9(3): 30–36.
Библиографическая ссылка Johns. G. (1981). Difference Score Measures of Organisational Behaviour Variables: A Critique. Organisational Behavior and Human Performance, 27: 443–463.
Библиографическая ссылка Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organisational psychology. In M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds.) Handbook of Industrial and Organisational Psychology2nd edition, (pp. 75–170). Palo Alto, CA.: Consulting Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Latham, G.P. & Baldes, J.J. (1975). The “practical significance” of Locke’s theory of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60: 122-124.
Библиографическая ссылка Latham, G.P., Erez, M. & Locke, E.A. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73: 753–772.
Библиографическая ссылка Lawler, E.E. (1971). Pay and Organizational Effectiveness. New York. McGraw Hill.
Библиографическая ссылка Leibfried, K.H. & McNair, C.J. (1992). Benchmarking: A tool for continuous improvement. NY: Harper Business.
Библиографическая ссылка Locke, E.A. & Latham, G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. N J: Prentice Hall.
Библиографическая ссылка MacNeil, J. & Rimmer, M. (1993). Benchmarking in Australia: The state of play. Asia Pacific Journal of Quality Management, 2: 30–45.
Библиографическая ссылка O’Leary-Kelly, A., Martocchio, J. J. & Frink, D. D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1285–1301.
Библиографическая ссылка Port, O. & Smith, G. (1992, November 30). Beg, borrow–and benchmark. Business Week. 74–75.
Библиографическая ссылка Schaffer, R.H. & Thomson, H. (1992). Successful change programs begin with results. Harvard Business Review, 70(1): 80–89.
Библиографическая ссылка Shetty, Y.K. (1993). Aiming high: Competitive benchmarking for superior performance. Long Range Planning, 26(1): 39–44.
Библиографическая ссылка Stank, T.P., Rogers, D.S. & Daugherty, P.J. (1994). Benchmarking: Applications by third party warehousing firms. Logistics and Tranportation Review, 30: 55–72.
Библиографическая ссылка Suls, J. & Wills, T.A. (1991). Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.
Библиографическая ссылка Spendolini, M. J. (1992). The benchmarking book. NY: Amacom.
Библиографическая ссылка Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Harper & Row.
Библиографическая ссылка Watson, G. H. (1992). The benchmarking workbook. Cambridge, Mass.: Productivity Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Weick, K. E.(1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist, 39(1): 40–49.
Библиографическая ссылка Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical Principles in Experimental DesignN.Y.: McGraw Hill.

Скрыть метаданые