Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Damiano, Anne, M.
Автор Epstein, Leonardo, D.
Автор Mackenzie, Ellen, J.
Дата выпуска 1995
dc.description Category rating is used to assess patient, family-member, provider, and societal preferences for health outcomes. Often, it is of interest to compare ratings obtained from different groups. Standard methods for making comparisons, such as regressions, correlations, and multiple t-tests, do not account for the dependency among ratings. The authors propose a new model for category ratings that does consider their relative dependency. This model provides a profile of ratings for a single group and facilitates comparisons across groups. It was applied to category ratings for four levels of Bending and Lifting function as defined by the recently developed Functional Capacity Index (FCI). Differences in ratings were observed across groups with different personal experiences of functional limitations and across groups with different degrees of clinical knowledge. These differences were not observed when standard methods were used. Thus, ignoring the relative nature of category ratings can lead to different conclusions about group preferences for health outcomes. When the ratings are being used to scale a health-status measure, this discrepancy has implications for the application of the measure in resource allocation. Key words: category scaling; health status measures. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:170-179)
Издатель Sage Publications
Название A New Model for Category-scaling Data with an Application to the Development of Health-status Measures
Тип Journal Article
DOI 10.1177/0272989X9501500210
Print ISSN 0272-989X
Журнал Medical Decision Making
Том 15
Первая страница 170
Последняя страница 179
Выпуск 2
Библиографическая ссылка Nunnally JCPsychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
Библиографическая ссылка Carter WB, Bobbit RA, Bergner M., et al.Validation for an interval scaling: the sickness impact profile. Health Serv Res. 1976;(Winter): 516-28.
Библиографическая ссылка Patrick DL, Sittampalam Y., Somerville SM, et al.A cross-cultural comparison of health status values. Am J Public Health. 1985; 75:1402-7.
Библиографическая ссылка Bergner M., Bobbit RA, Kressel, et al.The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv. 1976;6:393-415.
Библиографическая ссылка Patrick DL, Bush JW, Chen MMToward an operational definition of health. J Health Soc Behav . 1973;14:6-23.
Библиографическая ссылка Balaban DJ, Sagi PC, Goldfarb MI, et al.Weights for scoring the quality of well-being instrument among rheumatoid arthritics: a comparison to general population weights. Med Care. 1986; 24:973-80.
Библиографическая ссылка Wolfson AD, Sinclair AJ, Bombardier C., McGreer A.Preference measurements for functional status in stroke patients: interrater and intertechnique comparisons In: Kane RL, Kane RA, eds. Values and Long Term Care. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1982.
Библиографическая ссылка Anderson NHFoundations of Information Integration Theory. New York : Academic Press, 1981.
Библиографическая ссылка Von Winteifeldt D., Edwards W.Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Библиографическая ссылка Poulton ECBias in Quantifying Judgments. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1989.
Библиографическая ссылка MacKenzie EJ , Damiano AM, Luchter S., Miller TR, Ditunno JF A functional capacity index for traumatic injuries—a concept paper. 1992. Available upon request (AMD).
Библиографическая ссылка Damiano AMFurther Development and Evaluation of the Functional Capacity Index (Dissertation)Baltimore, MD: Johns Hop-kins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, 1993.
Библиографическая ссылка IMSL User's Manual. Houston, TX: IMSL, Inc., 1984.

Скрыть метаданые