Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Michie, Susan
Автор Drake, Harriet
Автор Marteau, Theresa
Автор Bobrow, Martin
Дата выпуска 1995
dc.description This study assesses the attitudes of the general public and of three professional groups to: genetic developments: the desired scope and availability of genetic testing in pregnancy; and decision-making about availability. Questionnaires were sent to 163 professionals and given directly to 973 members of the public by Gallup. Genetic developments were found to evoke both positive and negative feelings in all groups, but with the public being less positive overall than the professional groups. All groups endorsed the use of prenatal genetic screening and the offer of termination for serious conditions, but not for minor physical problems nor for non-disease characteristics. 54% of the general public did not want experts involved in decisions about the availability of new genetic tests, although 78% of professionals thought regulation should be by an advisory group including experts and members of the public. We need to develop ways of integrating public and professional views if the best decisions are to be made.
Издатель Sage Publications
Название A comparison of public and professionals' attitudes towards genetic developments
Тип Journal Article
DOI 10.1088/0963-6625/4/3/003
Print ISSN 0963-6625
Журнал Public Understanding of Science
Том 4
Первая страница 243
Последняя страница 253
Аффилиация Bobrow, Martin, Division of Medical and Molecular Genetics, at UMDS, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK, University of Cambridge
Выпуск 3
Библиографическая ссылка Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 1993, Genetic Screening: Ethical Issues (London: Nuffield Foundation).
Библиографическая ссылка Dutton, D., 1984, The impact of public participation in biomedical policy: evidence from four case studies. Citizen Participation in Science Policy, edited by James C. Petersen (Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press), Chap. 9.
Библиографическая ссылка Krimsky, S., 1992, Regulating recombinant DNA research and its application. Controversy: Politics of Technical Decisions, edited by D. Nelkin (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage), Chap. 12.
Библиографическая ссылка Krimsky, S., 1992, Regulating recombinant DNA research and its application. Controversy: Politics of Technical Decisions, edited by D. Nelkin (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage), p. 245.
Библиографическая ссылка Eurobarometer 35.1 (1991): Biotechnology (Brussels: INRA for the Commission of the European Communities).
Библиографическая ссылка Eurobaromter 39.1 (1993): Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering: what Europeans Think About it in 1993 (Brussels: INRA for the Commission of European Communities).
Библиографическая ссылка Martin, S., and Tait, J., 1993, Release of Genetically Modified Organisms: Public Attitudes and Understanding (Milton Keynes: Open University, Centre for Technology Study).
Библиографическая ссылка Lemkow, L., 1993, Public Attitudes to Genetic Engineering: some European Perspectives (Dublin: The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions).
Библиографическая ссылка Durant, J., Hansen, A., and Bauer, M., 1995, Public understanding of the new human genetics. The Benefits and Hazards of the New Human Genetics, edited by T. Marteau and M. Richards (Cambridge University Press).
Библиографическая ссылка Turney, J., 1994, Tasty, fresh and unnatural. The Times Higher Education Supplement, 8 April.
Библиографическая ссылка Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D., 1981, The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
Библиографическая ссылка Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., and Lichtenstein, S., 1980, Risky assumptions. Psychology Today, 14, 44-48.
Библиографическая ссылка Drake, H., Reid, M., and Marteau, T., 1995, Attitudes towards termination for fetal abnormality: comparisons between health professionals and lay groups in Europe (submitted).
Библиографическая ссылка Letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Charles Jarvis, 28 September 1820.

Скрыть метаданые