Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Horton, Steven, V.
Автор Lovitt, Thomas, C.
Дата выпуска 1994
dc.description This study examined the level of agreement between two methods of administering group reading inventories, computer and pencil and paper, leading to placing 72 secondary students, 38 males and 34 females, into three instructional groups—teacher directed, dyadic, and independent. The students, 13 with learning disabilities, 16 remedial, and 43 normally achieving, were enrolled in science and social studies classes in middle school and high school. In one condition, students read textbook passages presented on computer, completed study guides, and took 15-item tests on computer. In the other condition, the same students read passages from their textbooks, completed study guides, and took 15-item tests with pencil and paper. An equivalent time samples design was arranged, with four computer assessments and four pencil-and-pape r assessments randomly assigned. The dependent measures consisted of two types of test items, factual and interpretive. The results of group analysis significantly favored the computer overall on factual questions, with individual analyses indicating few significant differences resulting from the two types of group reading inventories. On interpretive test items, the results of group analysis revealed no significant difference between the two assessment methods, a finding generally corroborated by the individual analyses. Correlation coefficients substantiated significant positive relationships between the dependent measures and the group reading inventories. Overall, the placement of students in three instructional groups was identical for each type of group reading inventory in 72% of individual comparisons. Several recommendations for teachers are presented and discussed.
Издатель SAGE Publications
Название A Comparison of Two Methods of Administering Group Reading Inventories to Diverse Learners
Тип Journal Article
DOI 10.1177/074193259401500606
Electronic ISSN 1538-4756
Print ISSN 0741-9325
Журнал Remedial and Special Education
Том 15
Первая страница 378
Последняя страница 390
Аффилиация Horton, Steven, V., STEVEN V. HORTON is currently a special education teacher and a supervisor in the Learning Assistance Program for the Shoreline School District, Seattle, Washington. He received his PhD from the University of Washington in 1984. Formerly, he was an assistant professor at Wichita State University, Wichita, Kansas; a project director on two federal grants at the University of Washington; an adjunct instructor at Seattle Pacific University; and a special education teacher in Idaho and California. His research interests include instructional strategies for school-age children with special needs.
Аффилиация Lovitt, Thomas, C., THOMAS C. LOVITT is a professor of special education at the University of Washington, Seattle. He received his EdD from the University of Kansas in 1966. His research interests include school-based research, collaborations between schools and universities, and assisting general education teachers to accommodate youth with disabilities in their classes. Address: Steven V. Horton, 16105 NE 106th St., Redmond, WA 98052.
Выпуск 6
Библиографическая ссылка Armbruster, B. B. (1984). The problem of “inconsiderate text.” In G. G. Duffy, L. R. Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 202–217). New York: Longman.
Библиографическая ссылка Bergerud, D., Lovitt, T. C., & Horton, S. V. (1988). The effectiveness of textbook adaptations in life science for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 70–76.
Библиографическая ссылка Berkin, C., & Wood, L. (1983). Land of promise. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Библиографическая ссылка Biddle, B., Bank, B., Anderson, D., & Keats, D. (1981). The structure of idleness: Inschool and dropout adolescent activities in the United States and Australia. The Sociology of Education, 54, 106–119.
Библиографическая ссылка Budoff, M., Thorman, J., & Grass, A. (1984). Microcomputers in special education. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
Библиографическая ссылка Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Библиографическая ссылка Coffman, J. E., & Joyce, W. W. (1983). Latin America and Canada. Chicago: Follett.
Библиографическая ссылка Ebel, R. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Библиографическая ссылка Eckstrom, R., Goertz, M., Pollack, J., & Rock, A. (1987). Who drops out of high school and why? Findings from a national study. Teachers College Record, 87, 356–373.
Библиографическая ссылка Edgington, E. (1987). Randomization tests. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Библиографическая ссылка Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., Fuchs, D., Stecker, P. M., & Ferguson, C. (1988). Conducting curriculum-based measurement with computerized data collection: Effects on efficiency and teacher satisfaction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 9(2), 73–86.
Библиографическая ссылка Hahn, A. (1987). Reaching out to America's dropouts: What to do? Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 253–256.
Библиографическая ссылка Horton, S. V., Boone, R. A., & Lovitt, T. C. (1990). Teaching social studies to learning disabled high school students: Effects of a hypertext study guide. British Journal of Educational Technology, 21, 118–131.
Библиографическая ссылка Horton, S. V., & Lovitt, T. C. (1988). [Oral reading rates of learning disabled adolescents]. Unpublished raw data.
Библиографическая ссылка Horton, S. V., & Lovitt, T. C. (1989). Using study guides with three classifications of secondary students. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 447–462.
Библиографическая ссылка Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., & Bergerud, D. (1989). Construction and implementation of graphic organizers for academically handicapped and regular secondary students. Academic Therapy, 24, 625–640.
Библиографическая ссылка Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., & Bergerud, D. (1990). The effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students in content area classes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 12–22, 29.
Библиографическая ссылка Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., & Christensen, C. (1988). Effectiveness of matching three classifications of secondary students to differential levels of graphic organizers: Diagnosis, prescription, and management. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from S. V. Horton, 16105 NE 106th St., Redmond, WA 98052)
Библиографическая ссылка Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., & Christensen, C. (1991a). Matching three classifications of secondary students to differential levels of study guides. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 518–529.
Библиографическая ссылка Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., & Christensen, C. (1991b). Notetaking from textbooks: Effects of a columnar format for three categories of secondary students. Exceptionality, 2, 19–40.
Библиографическая ссылка Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., & Givens, A. (1988). A computer-based vocabulary program for three categories of students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 19, 131–143.
Библиографическая ссылка Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., Givens, A., & Nelson, R. (1989). Teaching social studies to secondary students with academic handicaps: Effects of a computerized study guide. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 102–107.
Библиографическая ссылка Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., & Slocum, T. (1988). Teaching geography to high school students with academic deficits: Effects of a computerized map tutorial. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 371–379.
Библиографическая ссылка Keene, S., & Davey, B. (1987). Effects of computer-presented text on LD adolescents' reading behaviors. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 283–290.
Библиографическая ссылка Levin, H., Zigmond, N., & Birch, J. (1985). A follow-up study of 52 learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 2–7.
Библиографическая ссылка Lovitt, T. C., & Horton, S. V. (1988). How to develop study guides. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 3, 333–343.
Библиографическая ссылка Lovitt, T. C., & Horton, S. V. (1991). Adapting textbooks for mildly handicapped adolescents. In G. Stoner, M. R. Shinn, & H. M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems (pp. 439–471). Silver Springs, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Библиографическая ссылка Lovitt, T. C., Horton, S. V., & Bergerud, D. (1987). Matching students with textbooks: An alternative readability formulas and standardized tests. British Columbia Journal of Special Education, 2(1), 49–55.
Библиографическая ссылка Magnoli, M. A., Shymansky, J. A., Blecha, M. K., & Holly, J. C. (1983). Experiences in physical science. River Forest, IL: Laidlaw.
Библиографическая ссылка Owings, J., & Stocking, C. (1985). Characteristics of high school students who identify themselves as handicapped. High school and beyond: A national longitudinal study for the 1980s. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Библиографическая ссылка Prescott, G.A., Balow, I. H., Hogan, T. P., & Farr, R. C. (1984). The metropolitan achievement test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
Библиографическая ссылка Rumberger, R. (1987). High school dropout: A review of the issues and evidence. Review of Educational Research, 57, 101–121.
Библиографическая ссылка Wehlage, G., & Rutter, R. (1986). Dropping out: How much do schools contribute to the problem? Teachers College Record, 87, 376–392.
Библиографическая ссылка Zigmond, N., & Thornton, H. (1985). Follow-up of post-secondary age LD graduates and dropouts. Learning Disabilities Research, 1(1), 50–55.

Скрыть метаданые