Автор |
Brown, Vincent |
Автор |
Paulus, Paul, B. |
Дата выпуска |
1996 |
dc.description |
The interactions between individuals in a group setting are a natural areafor the application of dynamic systems modeling. Groups gathered togetherfor the purpose of generating ideas are particularly suitable for a dynamic systems approach because each individual 's rate of idea production provides a natural time-varying measure of performnce. This article presents a dynamic model (differential equations) of group idea production designed to describe the effects that group members exert on each other's rates ofprocessing. Two of the most important factors influencing group idea-generation performance, the processes of production blocking and performance matching, are explicitly included in the model. The model is related to the existing literature on the "productivity gap" observed in brainstorning groups. One version of the model explicitly includes the cognitive processes of idea generation, working memory, and output. These types of models should aid theoretical development and the assessment of the role of social and cognitive factors in both conventional and electronic brainstorming. |
Издатель |
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. |
Название |
A Simple Dynamic Model of Social Factors in Group Brainstorming |
Тип |
Journal Article |
DOI |
10.1177/1046496496271005 |
Print ISSN |
1046-4964 |
Журнал |
Small Group Research |
Том |
27 |
Первая страница |
91 |
Последняя страница |
114 |
Аффилиация |
Paulus, Paul, B., University of Texas at Aington |
Выпуск |
1 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Brown, V., Pauhus, P. B., &Dzindolet, M. T. (1993, August).Modelling dynamic interactions in group braintorming. Paper presented at the Twenty-Sixth Annual Mathematical Psychology Meeting, Norman, OK. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Brown, V., Tumeo, M, Larey, T. S., &Paulus,P. B. (1995).Modelling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming. Manuscript in preparation. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Camadho, L M., & Paulus, P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in groupbrainstorming. Journal of Personaliy and Social Psychology, 68, 1071-1080. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Connolly, T., Routhieaux, R. L., & Schneider, S. K. (1993). On the effectiveness of group brainstorming: Test of one underlying cognitive mechanism. Small Group Research, 24, 490-503. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journd of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Diehl, Ki, &Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss inidea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Dzindolet, AL T. (1992). Braistorming: Why groups falter. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Gallupe, R. B., Dennis, A. R, Cooper, W. H., Valacidc, J. S., Bastianutti, L. M., & Nunamaker, J. R., Jr. (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 350-369. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Geen, R. G. (1989). Alternative conceptions of social facilitation. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaunL |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Hon, B. (1993) The influence of modaity order and breakperiod on a brainstorming sk. Unpublished honors thesis, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Karau, S. J., &Williams, K. D. (1993).Socialloafing:Ameta-analyticreviewandtheoretical integration. Journa of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 681-706. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Kerr, N. L., & Bruun, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78-94. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Kerr, N. L, & MacCoun, R. J. (1985). Role expectations in social dilemmas: Sex roles and taskmotivation in groups. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 49,1547-1556. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Levine, J. (1989). Reaction to opinion deviance in small groups. In Paul B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 187-231). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic review. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3-23. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Nunamaker, J. F., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., & Vogel, D. R. (1991). Information technology for negotiating groups: Generating options for mutual gain. Management Science, 37, 1325-1346. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Paulus, P. B., Brown, V., & Ortega, A. H. (in press). Group creativity. In R. E. Purser & A. Montuori (Eds.), Social creativity in organizations (Vol. 2). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Paulus, P. B., & Dzindolet, M. T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575-586. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming: The illusion of productivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 78-99. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Paulus, P. B., Larey, T. S., Putman, V. L., Leggett, K. L., & Roland, E. J. (1996). Social influence processes in computer brainstorming. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 3-14. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Purser, R. E. & Montueri, A. (in press). Social creativity in organizations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Seta, J. J. (1982). The impact of comparison process on coactors' task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 281-291. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Seta, J. J., Paulus, P. B., & Schkade, J. K. (1976). The effects of group size and proximity under competitive and cooperative conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34,47-53. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Seta, J. J., Seta, C. E., & Donaldson, S. (1991). The impact of comparison processes on coactors' frustration and willingness to expend effort. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 560-568. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Shepperd, J. A. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113,67-81. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Stasser, G., Kerr, N. L., & Davis, J. H. (1989). Influence processes and consensus models in decision-making groups. In Paul B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Stroebe, W., Diehl, M., & Abakoumkin, G. (1992). The illusion of group effectivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 643-650. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Torrance, E. P. (1972). Group dynamics and creative functioning. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Climate for creativity (pp. 75-96). New York: Pergamon. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending to an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 448-476. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. R., Jr. (1992). Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea-generation. Small Group Research, 23, 49-73. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (1994). Dynamical systems in social psychology. New York: Academic Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Wolfram, S. (1992). Mathematica: A system for doing mathematics by computer. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley. |