Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Boyle, Kevin J.
Автор Bergstrom, John C.
Дата выпуска 1992
dc.description Benefit transfer has been an ongoing, practical analysis for years in legal proceedings and government policy analyses where timely benefit estimates are critically dependent on the use of existing data. Most benefit transfer studies to date have been conducted behind closed doors and have not been open to scholarly review, and no systematic research agenda has been established to determine whether benefit transfer estimates are valid for public policy analyses. In this paper we propose a systematic, conceptual foundation for conducting benefit transfer studies, and suggest a research agenda to identify conditions under which valid benefit transfer estimates can be derived. We conclude, however, that this research agenda must be accompanied by improved conduct and reporting of original valuation studies before benefit transfer can become a widely used tool in public policy analyses.
Формат application.pdf
Копирайт Copyright 1992 by the American Geophysical Union.
Тема Problems and Issues in the Validity of Benefit Transfer Methodologies
Тема POLICY SCIENCES
Тема Benefit‐cost analysis
Тема Demand estimation
Тема Project evaluation
Название Benefit transfer studies: Myths, pragmatism, and idealism
Тип article
DOI 10.1029/91WR02591
Electronic ISSN 1944-7973
Print ISSN 0043-1397
Журнал Water Resources Research
Том 28
Первая страница 657
Последняя страница 663
Выпуск 3
Библиографическая ссылка Anderson, G. D., R. C.Bishop, The valuation problem, Natural Resource Economics: Policy Problems and Contemporary AnalysisD. W.Bromley, 89–137, Kluwer Nijhoff, Boston, Mass., 1989.
Библиографическая ссылка Bishop, R. C., K. J.Boyle, M. P.Welsh, R. M.Baumgartner, P. R.Rathbam, Glen Canyon Dam releases and downstream recreation: An analysis of user preferences and economic values, final reportU.S. Bur. of Reclam., Salt Lake City, Utah, 1987.
Библиографическая ссылка Cordell, H. K., J. C.Bergstrom, D. B. K.English, D. K.Klinko, C.Overdevest, Economic values and impacts of outdoor recreation at western North Carolina lakes under different management alternatives, final reportTenn. Valley Auth., N. C. Dep. of Environ., Health and Nat. Resour., Raleigh, 1990.
Библиографическая ссылка Cummings, R. G., D. S.Brookshire, W. D.Schulze, Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method, 270, Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, N. J., 1986.
Библиографическая ссылка Daubert, J., R.Young, Recreational demands for maintaining instream flows, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 634, 667–676, 1981.
Библиографическая ссылка Daubert, J., R.Young, L.Gray, Economic benefits from instream flow in a Colorado Mountain streamCompletion Rep. 91Colo. Water Resour. Res. Inst., Colo. State Univ., Fort Collins, 1979.
Библиографическая ссылка Desvousges, W. H., M. C.Naughton, andG. R.Parsons, Benefit transfer: Conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies,Water Resour. Res., 3.
Библиографическая ссылка Dickie, M., A.Fisher, S.Gerking, Market transactions and hypothetical demand data: A comparative study, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 821, 60–75, 1987.
Библиографическая ссылка Durden, G., J. F.Shogren, Valuing non‐market recreation goods: An evaluation survey of the literature on the travel cost and contingent valuation methods, Rev. Reg. Stud., 183, 1–15, 1988.
Библиографическая ссылка Forster, B. A., Valuing outdoor recreational activity: A methodological survey, J. Leisure Res., 212, 188–201, 1989.
Библиографическая ссылка Heberlein, T. O., R. C.Bishop, Assessing the validity of contingent valuation: Three field experiments, Sci. Total Environ., 56Nov., 99–107, 1986.
Библиографическая ссылка Henderson, J., Corps of engineers regional recreation demand modelW‐133 Regional Project technical committee meetingMonterey, Calif.Feb., 1991.
Библиографическая ссылка Loomis, J., The economic value of instream flow: Methodology and benefit estimates for optimum flows, J. Environ. Manage., 24, 169–179, 1987.
Библиографическая ссылка Mitchell, R. C., R. T.Carson, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., 1989.
Библиографическая ссылка Naughton, M. C., W. H.Desvousges, Water quality benefits of additional pollution control in the pulp and paper industry, final report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencycontract 68‐01‐7033Res. Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, N. C., 1986.
Библиографическая ссылка Phillips, C. V., R. J.Zeckhauser, Contingent valuation of damage to natural resources: How accurate? How appropriate?, Toxics Law Reporter, 9, 520–529, 1989.
Библиографическая ссылка Randall, A., J. R.Stoll, Consumer's surplus in commodity space, Am. Econ. Rev., 703, 449–455, 1980.
Библиографическая ссылка Scott, A., The valuation of game resources: Some theoretical aspectsCan. Fish. Rep., 4Dep. of Fish. of Can., Ottawa, Ont.May, 1965.
Библиографическая ссылка Smith, V. K., Y.Kaoru, Signals or noise?: Explaining the variation in recreation benefit estimates, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 722, 419–433, 1990.
Библиографическая ссылка Sorg, C. F., J. B.Loomis, Empirical estimates of amenity forest values: A comparative reviewGen. Tech. Rep. RM‐107Rocky Mountain For. and Range Exp. Stn., U.S. For. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agric., Fort Collins, Colo., 1984.
Библиографическая ссылка , U.S. Forest Service0, Resource pricing and valuation guidelines for the 1990 RPA program, report of the Chiefs' Technical Coordinating Committee on Resource Values for the 1990 RPA, Washington, D.C.March, 1987.
Библиографическая ссылка Walsh, R., R.Ericson, D.Arosteguy, M.Hansen, An empirical application of a model for estimating the recreation value of instream flow, Colo. Water Resour. Res. Inst., Colo. State Univ., Fort Collins, 1980.
Библиографическая ссылка Walsh, R. G., D. M.Johnson, J. R.McKean, Review of outdoor recreation demand studies with nonmarket benefit estimates, 1968–1988Tech. Rep. 54Colo. Water Resour. Res. Inst., Colo. State Univ., Fort Collins, 1988.
Библиографическая ссылка Walsh, R. G., D. M.Johnson, J. R.McKean, Issues in nonmarket valuation and policy application: A retrospective glance, West. J. Agric. Econ., 141, 178–188, 1989.
Библиографическая ссылка Ward, F. A., Optimally managing wild and scenic rivers for instream flow benefitsNational River Recreation SymposiumLa. State Univ.Baton Rouge, 1985.
Библиографическая ссылка Ward, F. A., Economics of water allocation to instream uses in a fully appropriated river basin: Evidence from a New Mexico wild river, Water Resour. Res., 233, 381–392, 1987.
Библиографическая ссылка Ward, F. A., J. B.Loomis, The travel cost demand model as an environmental policy assessment tool: A review of literature, West. J. Agric. Econ., 112, 164–178, 1986.

Скрыть метаданые