An examination of theoretical, conceptual, and empirical analyses of bureaucratic responsiveness reveals that, despite years of research, there is considerable confusion and ambiguity. Assessments as to the extent and nature of bureaucratic responsiveness vary tremendously; conflicting definitions of the central concept are commonly used; and competing—and perhaps equally valid—conceptualizations often are ignored entirely. Drawing upon relevant literature, this essay examines the concept of bureaucratic responsiveness and attempts to delineate (1) the major boundaries of the concept, (2) the principal theoretical and methodological limitations of various approaches, and (3) the main questions that have been thus far overlooked or inadequately addressed.