Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Griffin, Nicholas
Дата выпуска 1981
dc.description In a recent review David Gauthier presents two arguments designed to support the eminently comforting belief that, while recognizing aboriginal rights in Canada will entail some costs for the dominant European community, these costs will be of a comparatively modest nature, and certainly far less than the sort of compensation currently claimed by the indigenous peoples themselves. Unfortunately for the Europeans, but fortunately for the indigenes, there seems to be no moral justification whatsoever for the arguments he adduces. In fact, the only way his arguments can be made to work is by assuming that radically different sets of moral principles operate for different peoples. As usually happens in such cases, the Europeans get better protection from the moral principles designed for them, than the aborigines do from the principles designed (as it happens, by the Europeans) for them.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Cambridge University Press
Копирайт Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 1981
Название Aboriginal Rights: Gauthier's Arguments for Despoilation
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1017/S0012217300021429
Electronic ISSN 1759-0949
Print ISSN 0012-2173
Журнал Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review
Том 20
Первая страница 690
Последняя страница 696
Аффилиация Griffin Nicholas; McMaster University
Выпуск 4

Скрыть метаданые