| Автор | MacCormac, Earl R. |
| Дата выпуска | 1970 |
| dc.description | Recent defenders of the cognitive significance of religious language have had to face opponents from two directions; from those who demand that religious language be capable of some form of empirical verification (or falsification) and from those who demand that for religious language to be meaningful it must be capable of being understood in ordinary language. Apologists who have taken the first challenge seriously have strained to show that religious statements can be verified by ‘religious experience’, or by an ‘odd discernment’ or by an ‘eschatological verification’. Each of these responses raises further problems for the defender of religion, but in general they all are subject to their failure to provide an adequate criterion or standard by which they could be inter-subjectively tested. Facing in the other direction, theological apologists have attempted to justify religious expressions by showing that they could be subsumed under special categories of ordinary language; namely those of ‘convictional language’ and ‘performative language’. Although these defenders have shown that religious language has an ‘ordinary usage’, they have not shown that the cognitive elements of this usage can be reduced to the ‘use of ordinary language’. |
| Формат | application.pdf |
| Издатель | Cambridge University Press |
| Копирайт | Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970 |
| Название | A New Programme for Religious Language: The Transformational Generative Grammar |
| Тип | research-article |
| DOI | 10.1017/S0034412500000056 |
| Electronic ISSN | 1469-901X |
| Print ISSN | 0034-4125 |
| Журнал | Religious Studies |
| Том | 6 |
| Первая страница | 41 |
| Последняя страница | 55 |
| Аффилиация | MacCormac Earl R.; Davidson College |
| Выпуск | 1 |
