| Автор | Jessiman, Barry |
| Автор | Richardson, G. Mark |
| Автор | Clark, Cathy |
| Автор | Halbert, Bruce |
| Дата выпуска | 1992 |
| dc.description | AbstractOver the past several years, a number of reviews of various approaches employed or proposed by different jurisdictions for setting contaminated site cleanup objectives have been conducted. These methods are normally divided into two groups: absolute and relative. The absolute approach establishes a numerical concentration for a contaminant in soil that is applied to all sites, regardless of site‐specific factors. The relative approach generally employs a risk assessment modeling technique to derive a soil cleanup number based on site‐specific and chemical‐specific factors that will result in an acceptable exposure or risk. In the latter case, the numerical concentrations may vary from site to site, but the risk is the same. In the former, the numerical concentration is the same from site to site, but the risk, although unstated, varies. Numerous reviews of these methods have been undertaken, but all have been qualitative in nature, examining theoretical bases and not comparing the actual performance of each method in the assessment of one site. We have undertaken to derive cleanup guidelines for a single, existing contaminated site in Canada using ten different methods. Five of these were absolute methods (British Columbia Assessment Criteria, Alberta Soil Guidelines, Ontario Decommissioning Guidelines, Quebec ABC's, and New Jersey Acceptable Soil Contaminant Levels) and five were relative methods (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Public Health Evaluation Manual, U.S. Army Primary Pollutant Limit Values, California Site Mitigation Decision Tree, California Technical Standard, and AERIS). The resulting analysis compares relative methods to absolute, examines the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, and discusses the similarities and differences of the outputs of the various approaches when employed to set cleanup objectives. |
| Формат | application.pdf |
| Издатель | Taylor & Francis Group |
| Копирайт | Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC |
| Тема | guidelines |
| Тема | risk assessment |
| Тема | contaminated sites |
| Тема | exposure |
| Название | A quantitative evaluation of ten approaches to setting site‐specific cleanup objectives |
| Тип | research-article |
| DOI | 10.1080/15320389209383402 |
| Print ISSN | 1058-8337 |
| Журнал | Journal of Soil Contamination |
| Том | 1 |
| Первая страница | 39 |
| Последняя страница | 59 |
| Аффилиация | Jessiman, Barry; Hazardous Waste Section,Monitoring and Criteria Division,Environmental Health Directorate,Department of National Health and Welfare, Environmental Health Centre |
| Аффилиация | Richardson, G. Mark; Hazardous Waste Section,Monitoring and Criteria Division,Environmental Health Directorate,Department of National Health and Welfare, Environmental Health Centre |
| Аффилиация | Clark, Cathy; SENES Consultants Ltd. |
| Аффилиация | Halbert, Bruce; SENES Consultants Ltd. |
| Выпуск | 1 |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Alberta Environment. 1990. Alberta Tier I Criteria for Contaminated Soil Assessment and Remediation |
| Библиографическая ссылка | British Columbia Ministry of Environment. November 1989a. Criteria for Managing Contaminated Sites in British Columbia November, |
| Библиографическая ссылка | British Columbia Ministry of Environment. November 1989b. Developing Criteria and Objectives for Managing Contaminated Sites in British Columbia November, |
| Библиографическая ссылка | California Department of Health Services. August 1990. California Technical Standard for Determination of Soil Remediation Levels August, |
| Библиографическая ссылка | California Department of Health Services. 1986. The California Site Mitigation Decision Tree Manual |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Kostecki, P. T., Calabrese, E. J. and Horton, H. M. 1989. “Review of present risk assessment models for petroleum contaminated soils”. In Petroleum Contaminated Soils—Remediation Techniques, Environmental Fate and Risk Assessment, Edited by: Kostecki, P. T. and Calabrese, E. J. Vol. 1, 263–300. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Monenco Consultants Limited. 1987. Methods and Strategies Currently Used to Develop Cleanup Criteria for Contaminated Sites DSS 8338–0/4301 |
| Библиографическая ссылка | New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. 1990. Basis for NJDEP Interim Soil Action Levels |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Ontario Ministry of the Environment (OME). 1989. Guidelines for the Decommissioning and Cleanup of Sites in Ontario |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Quebec Ministère de l'Environnement (MENVIQ). February 1988. Contaminated Sites Rehabilitation Policy February, |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Seigrist, R. L. 1989. International Review of Approaches for Establishing Cleanup Goals for Hazardous Waste Contaminated Land, Rep. Institute of Georesourses and Pollution Research (GEFO), Agricultural Research Council of Norway. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | SENES Consultants Limited. September 1989. Contaminated Soil Cleanup In Canada, Vol. 6, User's Guide for the AERIS (An Aid for Evaluating the Redevelopment of Industrial Sites), September, Decommissioning Steering Committee. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | SENES Consultants Limited. July 1991. Analysis of Strategies for the Assessment of Hazardous Waste Sites, July, Health and Welfare Canada, Bureau of Chemical Hazards. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Soils Remediation Group (SRG). 1989. Pacific Place Soils Remediation Program: Parcels 8 and 9 Final Results of Field Investigations, Vol. 1, British Columbia Ministry of the Environment. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | United States Army Biomedical Research and Development Laboratory (U.S. Army). 1991. The Pollution Hazard Assessment System. Version 20: Documentation and Users Manual |
| Библиографическая ссылка | United States Army Medical Bioengineering Research and Development Laboratory (U.S. Army). April 1980. An Environmental Fate Model Leading to Preliminary Pollutant Limit Values for Human Health Effects, Tech. Rep. 8005 April, |
| Библиографическая ссылка | United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). December 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Vol. 1, Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A) Interim Final, December, Washington, D.C.: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. EPA/540/1–89/002 |
