Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор La Belle, B. E.
Автор Hadley, P. W.
Дата выпуска 1994
dc.description AbstractDemonstrations of remedial technologies are undertaken to show that the treatment process causes some level of contaminant reduction, and to follow important operating or process parameters during treatment. In projects utilizing biological processes, it is important to demonstrate that enhanced metabolic activity — the proposed treatment mechanism — actually is responsible for the contaminant reduction. Results from two field‐scale bioremediation projects are used to highlight the importance of remedial objectives or endpoints when designing proper controls and selecting appropriate analytical methods. The results are also used to illustrate some of the limitations of using the “total”; concentration of a mixture for evaluating the effectiveness of a technology.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Тема bioremediation
Тема technology demonstration.
Название Bio beware!! Constraints and considerations when demonstrating bioremediation technologies in the field
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/15320389409383457
Print ISSN 1058-8337
Журнал Journal of Soil Contamination
Том 3
Первая страница 119
Последняя страница 126
Аффилиация La Belle, B. E.; Department of Toxic Substances Control
Аффилиация Hadley, P. W.; Department of Toxic Substances Control
Выпуск 2
Библиографическая ссылка Elliott, J. J. and Melchor, M. T. 1982. “Petroleum (composition)”. In Kirk‐Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Third Edition, Volume 17: Peroxides and Peroxy Compounds to Piping Systems, 119–131. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Библиографическая ссылка Hayden, N. J., Voice, T. C., Annable, M. D. and Wallace, R. B. 1992. Prediction of leachate concentrations in petroleum‐contaminated soils. J. Soil Contam., 1(1): 81–93.
Библиографическая ссылка Hickman, G. T. and Novak, J. T. 1989. Relationship between subsurface biodegradation rates and microbial density. Environ. Sci. Technol., 23(5): 525–533.
Библиографическая ссылка La Belle, B. and Tomatore, F. June 1991. Above‐Ground Bioremediation of Biphenyl and Diphenyl Oxide Contaminated Soil, Remedial Technology Demonstration Project Report June, Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services.
Библиографическая ссылка Mackay, D. M. 1990. “Characterization of the distribution and behavior of contaminants in the subsurface”. In Ground Water and Soil Contamination Remediation: Toward Compatible Science, Policy and Public Perception — Report on a Colloquium Sponsored by the Water Science and Technology Board, 70–90. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Madsen, E. L. 1991. Determining in situ biodegradation — facts and challenges. Environ. Sci. Technol., 25(10): 1663–1672.
Библиографическая ссылка Smarkel, K. March 1990. Biological Remediation of a Fuel Contaminated Soil Site in Carson, California, Remedial Technology Demonstration Project Report March, Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services.
Библиографическая ссылка State of California Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Task Force. May 1988. Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Manual: Guidelines for Site Assessment, Cleanup, and Underground Storage Tank Closure, May, Sacramento, CA: State Water Resources Control Board.
Библиографическая ссылка Thomas, J. M. and Ward, C. H. 1989. In situ biorestoration of organic contaminants in the subsurface. Environ. Sci. Technol., 23(7): 760–766.
Библиографическая ссылка U.S. EPA. June 1992. Bioremediation in the Field June, Cincinnati, OH EPA/540/N‐92/002

Скрыть метаданые