Anchor tags affect swimming performance and growth of juvenile red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus)
Serafy, J. E.; Lutz, S. J.; Capo, T. R.; Ortner, P. B.; Lutz, P. L.; Serafy, J. E.; Division of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami; Lutz, S. J.; Division of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami; Capo, T. R.; Division of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami; Ortner, P. B.; Division of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami; Lutz, P. L.; Division of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami; Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic University
Журнал:
Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology
Дата:
1995
Аннотация:
Swimming efficiency and growth of anchor‐tagged red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) juveniles were compared with untagged controls. The O<sub>2</sub> consumption of fish swimming at different speeds was measured in a Blazka‐type respirometer. Daily growth rates of tagged and untagged red drum were compared over 42 d of feeding fixed rations of live mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) to siblings held individually in 380 L tanks. At swimming speeds of ≤1.0 body lengths per second (bl s<sup>‐1</sup>), no differences in O<sub>2</sub> consumption were found. However, at speeds of 1.5–2.5 bl s<sup>‐1</sup>, tagged red drum O<sub>2</sub> consumption was significantly greater (by 36–39%) than that of untagged fish (ANOVA, P<0.05), indicating a substantially impaired swimming efficiency. Daily growth rates of tagged and untagged fish also differed significantly (P < 0.02). Tagged fish grew at a mean rate of 0.95 mm d<sup>‐1</sup> and 1.45 g d<sup>‐1</sup>, while untagged fish (controls) grew at 1.14 mm d<sup>‐1</sup> and 1.62 g d<sup>‐1</sup>. Results suggest that internal anchor tags, which weighed less than 1% offish body weight, represented a hydrodynamic drag burden that reduced swimming performance and growth. These effects may decrease growth and/or survival in the wild and thus bias estimates of biological parameters in stock assessment and enhancement studies.
374.2Кб