Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Mazzie, Claudia A.
Дата выпуска 1987
dc.description Traditionally, spoken language has been characterized as relatively implicit (or context dependent) when compared with written language, which is seen as explicit. This paper examines the relationship between modality and context sensitivity. An informal but controlled experiment was designed to elicit comparable texts in eight different conditions, each condition serving as an instance of the permutation of the three variables under investigation: content (abstract vs. narrative), modality (written vs. spoken), and sender/receiver relationship (individual, real audience vs. multiple, imagined audience). Separate texts were elicited from 32 undergraduates and all referential noun phrases in each text were coded according to a modified version of Prince's (1981) taxonomy of given/new information. The major finding was that the main determinant of implicitness, when defined in terms of Inferrable vs. Evoked information, was the variable of content, not that of modality: abstract texts contained more Inferrable information (in Prince's sense) than did narrative texts, regardless of modality.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Название An experimental investigation of the determinants of implicitness in spoken and written discourse
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/01638538709544657
Electronic ISSN 1532-6950
Print ISSN 0163-853X
Журнал Discourse Processes
Том 10
Первая страница 31
Последняя страница 42
Аффилиация Mazzie, Claudia A.; Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania
Выпуск 1
Библиографическая ссылка Akinnaso, F. N. 1982. “The literate and the non‐literate chants: Written language and ritual communication in sociological perspective”. In Linguistics and Literacy, Edited by: Frawley, W. New York: Plenum.
Библиографическая ссылка Chafe, W. Integration and involvement in spoken and written language. Paper presented at 2nd Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies. Vienna.
Библиографическая ссылка Chafe, W. 1982. “Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature”. In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring orality and literacy, Edited by: Tannen, D. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Библиографическая ссылка Ochs, E. 1979. “Planned and unplanned discourse”. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax, Edited by: Givon, T. Vol. 12, New York: Academic.
Библиографическая ссылка Olson, D. 1977. From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47: 257–281.
Библиографическая ссылка Prince, E. F. 1981. “Toward a taxonomy of given/new information”. In Radical Pragmatics, Edited by: Cole, P. New York: Academic.
Библиографическая ссылка Tannen, D. 1982. Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written discourse. Language, 58: 1–20.
Библиографическая ссылка Redeker, G. 1984. On differences between spoken and written language. Discourse Processes, 7: 43–55.
Библиографическая ссылка Wetzel, P. J. and Ladd, D.R. Between spoken and written style: A practical exercise in ‘syntax beyond the sentence’. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Northeast Linguistic Society. Part 1

Скрыть метаданые