Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Golder, Caroline
Автор Coirier, Pierre
Дата выпуска 1994
dc.description Although children exhibit oral argumentative capabilities at a very young age, the ability to carry out the same argumentative processes in writing seems to be acquired later. The present study focuses on argumentative negotiation, a process by which speakers “remove themselves” from their discourse, thereby providing “room for discussion” with their addressee(s). This process is characteristic of elaborate argumentative discourse. At what age is it mastered in its various text forms? What factors explain it? Each of 115 subjects from 10 to 16 years old performed four tasks: an argumentative writing task, a textuality task, an argumentative script inference task, and an argumentativity judgment task. Progress was observed between the ages of 10 and 16 on all four tasks, particularly for argumentativity judgments and argumentative writing. Moreover, the performance observed on these two tasks was highly correlated for the older children.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Название Argumentative text writing: Developmental trends
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/01638539409544891
Electronic ISSN 1532-6950
Print ISSN 0163-853X
Журнал Discourse Processes
Том 18
Первая страница 187
Последняя страница 210
Аффилиация Golder, Caroline; Laboratoire Langage et Communication, URA C.N.R.S. 1607, Université de Poitiers
Аффилиация Coirier, Pierre; Université de Poitiers
Выпуск 2
Библиографическая ссылка Apothéloz, D. and Miéville, D. 1989. “Cohérence et discours argumenté [Coherence and argumentative discourse]”. In The resolution of discourse, Edited by: Charolles, M. 68–87. Hamburg: Buske Verlag.
Библиографическая ссылка Bereiter, C. 1980. “Development in writing”. In Cognitive processes in writing, Edited by: Gregg, L.W. and Steinberg, E.R. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Библиографическая ссылка Botvin, G.J. and Sutton‐Smith, B. 1977. The development of structural complexity in children's fantasy narratives. Developmental Psychology, 13: 377–388.
Библиографическая ссылка Brassart, D.G. 1988. La gestion des contre‐arguments dans le texte argumentatif écrit chez les élèves de 8 à 12 ans et les adultes compétents [Managing counterarguments in written argumentative texts in 8‐ to 12‐year‐old children and competent adults]. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4: 51–69.
Библиографическая ссылка Brassart, D.G. 1992. Negation, concession and refutation in counterargumentative composition by pupils from 8 to 12 years old and adults. Argumentation, 6: 77–98.
Библиографическая ссылка Brewer, W.F. and Lichtenstein, E.H. 1982. Stories are to entertain: A structural affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6: 473–486.
Библиографическая ссылка Charolles, M. 1980. Les formes directes et indirectes de l'argumentation [The direct and indirect forms of argumentation]. Pratiques, 28: 7–43.
Библиографическая ссылка Clark, H.H. and Haviland, S.E. 1977. “Comprehension and the given‐new contract”. In Discourse production and comprehension, Edited by: Freedle, R.O. 1–40. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Библиографическая ссылка Clark, R. A. and Delia, J.G. 1976. The development of functional persuasive skills in childhood and early adolescence. Child Development, 78: 1008–1014.
Библиографическая ссылка Coirier, P. Argumentative discourse: Supporting structure and discourse involvement. Paper presented at the SIG EARLI “Writing,”. Paris. January.
Библиографическая ссылка Coirier, P., Coquin, D., Golder, C. and Passerault, J.M. 1990. Le traitement cognitif du texte argumentatif: Recherches en production et en compréhension [Cognitive processing of argumentative text: Research in comprehension and production]. Archives de Psychologie, 58: 315–348.
Библиографическая ссылка Coirier, P. and Golder, C. 1993. Production of supporting structure: Developmental study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2: 1–13.
Библиографическая ссылка Coirier, P. and Marchand, E. 1993. “Writing argumentative texts: A typological and structural approach”. In Writing: Current trends in European research, Edited by: Eigler, G. and Jechle, T. 163–181. Freiburg: Hochschul Verlag.
Библиографическая ссылка Coquin, D. and Coirier, P. 1992. The discursive structures of argumentation: Effects of the type of referential space. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 3: 219–229.
Библиографическая ссылка de Bemardi, B. and Antolini, E. “Structural differences in the production of written arguments”. In Argumentation in texts: Developmental studies in production and comprehension, (Special issue of Argumentation) Edited by: Golder, C. and Schneuwly, B. Dordrecht, , Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (in press)
Библиографическая ссылка Delia, J.G. and Clark, R.A. 1977. Cognitive complexity, social perception and the development of listener‐adapted communication in six, eight, ten and twelve‐year‐old boys. Communication Monographs, 44: 326–345.
Библиографическая ссылка Dorval, B. and Eckerman, C.O. 1984. Developmental trends in the quality of conversation achieved by small groups of acquainted peers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 49: 1–72.
Библиографическая ссылка Eisenberg, A.R. 1992. Conflicts between mothers and their young children. Merrill‐Palmer Quarterly, 38: 21–44.
Библиографическая ссылка Eisenberg, A.R. and Garvey, C. 1981. Childrens’ use Of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes, 4: 149–170.
Библиографическая ссылка Espéret, E., Coirier, P., Coquin, D. and Passerault, J.M. 1987. L'implication du locuteur dans son discours: Discours argumentatifs formel et naturel [Discursive involvement of the locuter in formal and natural argumentative discourse]. Argumentation, 1: 149–168.
Библиографическая ссылка Falbo, T. 1977. Multidimensional scaling of power strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35: 537–547.
Библиографическая ссылка Garvey, C. 1992. Talk in the study of socialization and development. Merrill‐Palmer Quarterly, 38: 50–67.
Библиографическая ссылка Genishi, C. and Di Paolo, M. 1982. “Learning through argument in a preschool”. In Communicating in the classroom, Edited by: Wilkinson, L.C. 49–68. New York: Academic.
Библиографическая ссылка Golder, C. 1992a. Argumenter: De la justification à la négociation [Arguing: From justification to negotiation]. Archives de Psychologic, 60: 3–24.
Библиографическая ссылка Golder, C. 1992b. Production of elaborated argumentative discourse: The role of cooperativeness. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 7: 49–57.
Библиографическая ссылка Golder, C. 1992c. Mise en place de la conduite de dialogue argumentatif: La recevabilité des arguments [The establishment of argumentative‐dialogue behaviors: Acceptability of arguments]. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 102: 31–43.
Библиографическая ссылка Golder, C. and Coirier, P. “The production and recognition of typological argumentative text marks”. In Argumentation in texts: Developmental studies in production and comprehension, (Special issue of Argumentation) Edited by: Golder, C. and Schneuwly, B. Dordrecht, , Holland: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (in press)
Библиографическая ссылка Grice, H.P. 1979. Logique et conversation [Logic and conversation]. Communications, 30: 57–72.
Библиографическая ссылка Grize, J.B. 1990. Logique et langage [Logic and language], Paris: Ophrys.
Библиографическая ссылка Hale, C.L. and Delia, J.G. 1976. Cognitive complexity and social perspective taking. Communication Monographs, 43: 195–203.
Библиографическая ссылка Hayes, J.R. and Flower, L.S. 1980. “Identifying the organization of the writing process”. In Cognitive processes of writing, Edited by: Gregg, L.W. and Steinberg, E.R. 3–30. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Библиографическая ссылка Lehalle, H. and Jouen, F. 1978. Quelques verbes d'opinion et leurs présuppositions: Étude génétique de leur compréhension chez l'adolescent [Understanding some opinion verbs and their presuppositions: A developmental study in adolescents]. Enfance, 4: 237–245.
Библиографическая ссылка McClure, E. and Geva, E. 1983. The development of the cohesive use of adversative conjunctions in discourse. Discourse Processes, 6: 411–432.
Библиографическая ссылка McCutchen, D. 1987. Children's discourse skill: Form and modality requirements of schooled writing. Discourse Processes, 10: 267–286.
Библиографическая ссылка Miller, M. 1986. “Argumentation and cognition”. In Social and functional approaches to language and thought, Edited by: Hickmann, M. 225–249. New York: Academic.
Библиографическая ссылка Miller, M. 1987. Culture and collective argumentation. Argumentation, 1: 127–154.
Библиографическая ссылка Mininni, G. 1981. Some remarks on the argumentative competence. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 8: 173–186.
Библиографическая ссылка Pellegrini, A., Galda, L. and Rubin, D. 1984. Persuasion as a social‐cognitive activity: The effects of age and channel of communication on children's production of persuasive messages. Language and Communication, 4: 285–293.
Библиографическая ссылка Pièraut‐Le Bonniec, G. and Valletta, M. 1987. “Développement du raisonnement argumentatif chez l'adolescent [The development of argumentative reasoning in adolescents]”. In Connaître et le dire, Edited by: Pièraut‐Le Bonniec, G. 263–275. Bruxelles: Mardaga.
Библиографическая ссылка Rubin, D.L. and Piche, G.L. 1979. Development in syntactic and strategic aspects of audience adaptation skills in written persuasive communication. Research in the Teaching of English, 13: 293–316.
Библиографическая ссылка Schneuwly, B. 1988. Le langage écrit chez l'enfant [Written language in children], Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Библиографическая ссылка Schober, M.F. and Clark, H.H. 1989. Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21: 211–232.
Библиографическая ссылка Scinto, L.F.M. 1984. Architectonics of texts produced by children and the development of higher cognitive function. Discourse Processes, 7: 371–418.
Библиографическая ссылка Sirois, P. and Dorval, B. 1988. The role of returns to a prior topic in the negotiation of topic change: A developmental investigation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17: 185–210.
Библиографическая ссылка Stein, N.L. and Miller, C.A. in press. A theory of argumentative understanding: Relationships among position preference, judgments of goodness, memory and reasoning. Argumentation,
Библиографическая ссылка Toulmin, S.E. 1958. The use of argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Voss, J.F., Greene, T.R., Post, T.A. and Penner, B.C. 1983. “Problem solving skill in the social sciences”. In The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research theory, Edited by: Bower, G.H. 165–213. New York: Academic.
Библиографическая ссылка Weiss, D.M. and Sachs, J. 1991. Persuasive strategies used by preschool children. Discourse Processes, 14: 55–72.

Скрыть метаданые