Автор |
Mauner, Gail |
Автор |
Tanenhaus, Michael K. |
Автор |
Carlson, Greg N. |
Дата выпуска |
1995 |
dc.description |
AbstractTanenhaus and Carlson (1990, experiment 1) reported that surface anaphors were more difficult to comprehend than deep anaphors when the antecedent for the anaphor did not form a syntactic constituent, i.e. when it was presented in a passive construction as compared to an active construction and the anaphor was in active voice. However, parallelism of the antecedent did affect the time it took readers to comprehend deep anaphors. This paper reports a reanalysis of that data and two experiments based on the reanalysis. The parallelism effects for deep anaphors were completely eliminated following short passives but not full passives. The results are interpreted as support for the claim that deep and surface anaphors access different types of representations. We also suggest that previous findings of parallelism effects for deep anaphors may be due to factors other than structural parallelism. |
Формат |
application.pdf |
Издатель |
Taylor & Francis Group |
Копирайт |
Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC |
Название |
A note on parallelism effects in processing deep and surface verb-phrase anaphora |
Тип |
research-article |
DOI |
10.1080/01690969508407085 |
Electronic ISSN |
1464-0732 |
Print ISSN |
0169-0965 |
Журнал |
Language and Cognitive Processes |
Том |
10 |
Первая страница |
1 |
Последняя страница |
12 |
Аффилиация |
Mauner, Gail; Department of Psychology, University of Rochester |
Аффилиация |
Tanenhaus, Michael K.; Department of Psychology, University of Rochester |
Аффилиация |
Carlson, Greg N.; Department of Linguistics, University of Rochester |
Выпуск |
1 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Anderson, A., Garrod, S. C. and Sanford, A. J. 1983. The accessibility of prenominal antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A: 427–440. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Anderson, J. 1974. Verbatim and propositional representation of sentences in immediate and long‐term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13: 149–162. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Chao, W. 1987. On ellipsis, PhD dissertation, UMASS Amherst. Cambridge, MA: Graduate Linguistics Student Association. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Dooling, D. J. and Christiaansen, R. E. 1977. “Levels of encoding and retention of prose”. In The psychology of learning and motivation, Edited by: Bower, G. H. Vol. 11, New York: Academic Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Garnham, A. 1981. Mental models as representations of text. Memory and Cognition, 9: 560–565. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Garnham, A. 1982. Testing psychological theories about inference‐making. Memory and Cognition, 10: 341–349. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Garnham, A. 1987. “Understanding anaphora”. In Progress in the psychology of language, Edited by: Ellis, A. W. Vol. 3, Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Garnham, A. and Oakhill, J. 1987. Interpreting elliptical verb phrases. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A: 611–627. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Hankamer, J. 1978. On the non‐transformational nature of some null VP anaphors. Linguistic Inquiry, 9: 66–74. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Hankamer, J. and Sag, L. A. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 7: 391–426. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Hardt, D. 1993. Verb phrase ellipsis: Form, meaning, and processing, University of Pennsylvania. Unpublished PhD dissertation |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Johnson‐Laird, P. 1983. Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Johnson‐Laird, P. and Stevenson, R. 1970. Memory for syntax. Nature, 227: 412 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Lesgold, A., Roth, S. and Curtis, M. E. 1979. Foregrounding effects in discourse comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18: 291–308. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Murphy, G. L. 1982. Understanding anaphora, Stanford University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Murphy, G. L. 1985a. Processes of understanding anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language, 24: 290–303. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Murphy, G. L. 1985b. Psychological explanations of deep and surface anaphora. Journal of Pragmatics, 9: 785–813. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Murphy, G. L. 1990. Interpretation of verb phrase anaphora: Influences of task and syntactic context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 42A: 675–692. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Sachs, J. 1967. Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics, 2: 437–442. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Sag, I. A. and Hankamer, J. 1984. Towards a theory of anaphoric processing. Linguistics and Philosophy, 7: 325–345. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Schacter, P. 1977. Does she or doesn't she?. Linguistic Inquiry, 7: 664–671. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Shenkman, K. 1993. Structure sensitivity and Language processing in adult learners of English, University of Rochester. Unpublished PhD dissertation |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Tanenhaus, M. K. and Carlson, G. N. 1990. Comprehension of deep and surface verb phrase anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5: 257–280. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G. N. and Seidenberg, M. S. 1985. “Do listeners compute linguistic representations?”. In Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational and theoretical perspectives, Edited by: Dowty, D., Kartunnen, L. and Zwicky, A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Webber, B. L. 1981. “Discourse model synthesis: Preliminaries to reference”. In Elements of discourse understanding, Edited by: Joshi, A. K., Webber, B. L. and Sag, I. A. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |