Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Davis, Sid
Автор King, James
Дата выпуска 1994
dc.description ABSTRACTThis study surveyed 605 agricultural-based microcomputer users throughout the United States. The goal of the survey was to gather information related to three important issues: (1) How familiar are farmers with available agricultural software, and what channels do they use to find out about what software is available? (2) How do farmers rate currently-available software, and what problems, if any, do they encounter in using it? (3) Are there reasonable ways for farmers to provide input during the software development process in order to avoid some of the problems that occur with currently available software? The results of the study indicated that a large percentage of respondents were unfamiliar with agricultural software products and that supplementing current information dissemination channels with more direct methods of information dispersion may prove beneficial. Also, respondents felt that agricultural software needs to be more flexible to address a diversity of agricultural computing needs, that it needs to be easier to use, and that developers should provide adequate technical support and feedback. Farmers indicated that they would be willing to become involved in the software development process by providing feedback to developers via questionnaires, testing pilot versions of software, or reacting to verbal or visual descriptions of the software. Lastly, respondents felt that the Extension System should play a major role in agricultural computing by developing and disseminating computer software and by providing hardware support to users. Based on these findings recommendations are made to facilitate software adoption and use in the farm sector.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Тема Computers
Тема information system design
Тема technology adoption
Тема computer interface
Тема training
Тема extension
Тема participation
Тема surveys
Название An Assessment of Microcomputer Software in the Farm Sector: Is It Meeting Users' Expectations?
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1300/J108v02n02_08
Electronic ISSN 1540-4722
Print ISSN 1049-6505
Журнал Journal of Agricultural & Food Information
Том 2
Первая страница 81
Последняя страница 106
Аффилиация Davis, Sid; College of Business Administration, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Аффилиация King, James; Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Выпуск 2
Библиографическая ссылка Abbott, E. A. 1989. The electronic farmers' market place: New technologies and agricultural information.. Journal of Communication, 39: 124–136.
Библиографическая ссылка Beasely, J. O. 1983. Microcomputers on the farm., Indianapolis: Howard W. Sams & Company..
Библиографическая ссылка Bowen, B. E. and Escolme, K. M. 1990. Computer education priorities of farmers.. Journal of Agricultural Education, 3: 39–45.
Библиографическая ссылка Carroll, J. M., Mack, R. L., Lewis, C. H., Grishckowski, N. L. and Robertson, S. R. 1985. Exploring a word processor.. Human-Computer Interaction, 1: 283–307.
Библиографическая ссылка Carroll, J. M and Rosson, M. B. 1987. “Paradox of the active user.”. In Interfacing thought., Edited by: Carroll, J. M. 80–111. Boston: MIT Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Carroll, J. M., Smith-Kerker, P. L., Ford, J. R. and Mazur-Rimetz, S. A. 1987. The minimal manual.. Human-Computer Interaction, 3: 123–153.
Библиографическая ссылка Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.. MIS Quarterly, 13: 319–340.
Библиографическая ссылка Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models.. Management Science, 35: 982–1003.
Библиографическая ссылка Davis, S. A. and Bostrom, R. P. 1993. Training end-users: An experimental investigation of the roles of the computer interface and training methods.. MIS Quarterly, 17: 61–85.
Библиографическая ссылка Devlin, B. 1989. Users as research inventions: How research categories perpetuate inequities.. Journal of Communication, 39: 216–232.
Библиографическая ссылка Ford, S. A. and Babb, E. M. 1989. Farmer sources and uses of information.. Agribusiness, 5: 465–476.
Библиографическая ссылка Gallagher, C. A. 1974. Perceptions of the value of a management information system.. Academy of Management Journal, 17: 46–55.
Библиографическая ссылка Guthrie, A. 1972. A survey of Canadian middle managers' attitudes toward management information systems., Ottawa, Ontario: Carleton University..
Библиографическая ссылка Iddings, R. K. and Apps, J. W. 1992. Learning preferences and farm computer use.. Journal of Extension, : 16–17.
Библиографическая ссылка Jones, P. 1989. Agricultural applications of expert systems concepts.. Agricultural Systems, 31: 3–18.
Библиографическая ссылка LaRose, R. and Mettler, J. 1989. Who uses information technologies in rural America?. Journal of Communication, 39: 48–60.
Библиографическая ссылка Levins, R. A. and Walden, W. C. 1984. Agricultural computer programming., Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Библиографическая ссылка Maish, A. M. 1979. User's behavior toward his MIS.. MIS Quarterly, 3: 39–52.
Библиографическая ссылка Malone, T. W. and Lepper, M. R. 1987. “Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning.”. In In Aptitude, learning, and instruction., Edited by: Snow, R. E. and Fair, M. J. 223–253. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Библиографическая ссылка Michard, A. 1982. Graphical presentation of boolean expressions in a database query language: Design notes and an ergonomic evaluation.. Behavior and Information Technology, 1: 279–288.
Библиографическая ссылка Nickerson, R. 1981. Why interactive computer systems are sometimes not used by people who might benefit from them.. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 15: 469–483.
Библиографическая ссылка Novak, J. L. and Stegelin, F. E. 1988. U.S. farmers' attitudes towards microcomputer uses.. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 3: 81–89.
Библиографическая ссылка Putler, D. S. and Zilberman, D. 1988. Computer use in agriculture: Evidence from Tulare County, California.. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70: 790–802.
Библиографическая ссылка Quinlan, D. and Martin, R. 1990. An evaluation of on-farm microcomputer use.. Journal of Agricultural Education, 31: 7–11.
Библиографическая ссылка Raban, A. Summer. 1988. Word processing learning techniques and user learning preferences.. SIGCHI Bulletin, : 83–87.
Библиографическая ссылка Rohr, G. 1984. “Understanding visual symbols.”. In IEEE Computer Society Workshop on Visual Languages., 184–191. Hiroshima, , Japan: The Computer Society Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Shneiderman, B. 1983. Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages.. IEEE Computer, 16: 57–69.
Библиографическая ссылка Sonka, S. T. 1983. Computers in farming—selection and use., New York: McGraw-Hill.
Библиографическая ссылка Sonka, S. T., Hofing, S. L. and Changnon, S. A. Jr. 1988. Evaluating information as a strategic resource: An illustration for climate information.. Agribusiness, 4: 475–491.

Скрыть метаданые