Alternative Social Structures and Foster Relations in the Hindu Kush: Milk Kinship Allegiance in Former Mountain Kingdoms of Northern PakistanThis essay is indebted to the prior ethnography of German colleagues in the Hindu Kush, especially of Karl Jettmar, my professorial sponsor as an Alexander von Humboldt research fellow at Heidelberg University from 1984 to 1986, who very generously afforded access to the unpublished Ms. of Hussam-ul-Mulk (n.d.), including his own acute commentary on Chitrali milk kinship. I am also grateful to Jeremy MacClancy, who instigated this article by suggesting a collaborative work on global fosterage, and to helpful comments from Rodney Needham. Comparison of milk kinship with godparenthood was originally inspired by John Davis (1977:236–8), further benefiting from Jane Khatib-Chahidiʼs (1992) comparative considerations of Eurasian fosterage, while the potential comparability of Arabic and Balkan milk kinship was presciently noted by Soraya Altorki (1980:244 n. 14).
Parkes, Peter; Parkes Peter; University of Kent
Журнал:
Comparative Studies in Society and History
Дата:
2001
Аннотация:
This article is a comparative elaboration of Eugene Hammelʼs pioneering analysis of “fictive kinship,” Alternative Social Structures and Ritual Relations in the Balkans (1968). In place of godparenthood, I examine the structurally similar institution of fosterage or “milk kinship” as documented in former mountain kingdoms of the Hindu Kush in northern Pakistan. Comparable structures of interdomestic allegiance and tributary patronage organized through milk kinship are attested more fragmentarily elsewhere in the Middle East and Central Asia, and there is further evidence that such hierarchized foster relations also extended into many peripheral regions of premodern Europe (E. Goody 1982:280–1; Parkes n.d.). Hammel himself mentioned Serbian “kinship by milk” (srodstvo po mleku)—“meaning the fictive kinship relationship between two children suckled by the same woman, but otherwise unrelated” (1968:31 n.27)—with reference to Filopovichʼs (1963) earlier survey of South Slavonic ritual kinship. Yet Hammel did not pursue the possible analogies of such fosterage ties with kumstvo godparenthood: as structurally equivalent institutions of constructed kinship, once orchestrating transitive chains of interdomestic allegiance and tributary governance in peripheral polities throughout Eurasia.
262.5Кб