Автор |
Lipietz, Alain |
Дата выпуска |
1995 |
dc.description |
AbstractIn France, the end of the 1980s witnessed the rise of an unexpected orthodoxy concerning regional planning. According to it, the growth of a megapolis around Paris (in the region Île‐de‐France) would be the only card in the hands of French productivist planners in order to resist the marginalization of France within Europe. This orthodoxy expressed a quasi‐consensus reflected in the debates about the new Schéma Directeur Regional de l'Île de France (SDRIF), the regional plan for the Paris region over the next quarter of a century. Yet the orthodoxy was criticized from two sides: the theoretical disadvantages of a megapolis, and the growing opposition of concerned citizens, first the mayors of suburban cities (from any side of the political chessboard), and above all the emergence of ecologists (18% at regional elections in Île‐de‐France, 1992). Unexpectedly, in 1993, the new (right‐wing) Minister of the Interior, Charles Pasqua, decided to put an end to the growth of the Parisian megapolis. He reflected thus a general turn in mindsets. Yet this does not mean that everybody agrees with the strategy for avoiding megapolis, and in fact it could mean a new form of megapolization. |
Формат |
application.pdf |
Издатель |
Taylor & Francis Group |
Копирайт |
Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC |
Название |
Avoiding megapolization: The battle of Île‐de‐France |
Тип |
research-article |
DOI |
10.1080/09654319508720297 |
Electronic ISSN |
1469-5944 |
Print ISSN |
0965-4313 |
Журнал |
European Planning Studies |
Том |
3 |
Первая страница |
143 |
Последняя страница |
154 |
Аффилиация |
Lipietz, Alain; Economist at CEPREMAP‐CNRS; Former Member for the Corseil Regional of Île‐de‐France (Green Group) |
Выпуск |
2 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Benko, G. and Lipietz, A., eds. 1992. Les régions qui gagnent. Districts et réseaux: les nouveaux paradigmes de la géographie économique, Paris: PUF. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Ganne, B. 1992. “Place et évolution des systèmes productifs locaux en France: économie politique d'une transformation”. Edited by: Benko and Lipietz. (1992) |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Leborgne, D. and Lipietz, A. 1991. “Two social strategies in the production of new industrial spaces”. In Industrial Change & Regional Development, Edited by: Benko, G. and Dunford, M. London: Belhaven Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Leborgne, D. and Lipietz, A. 1992. “Conceptual fallacies and open questions on post‐Fordism”. In Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development, Edited by: Storper, M. and Scott, A. London: Routledge. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Lipietz, A. 1977. Le Capital et son espace, Paris: F. Maspéro. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Lipietz, A. 1987. Mirages and Miracles. The Crises of Global Fordism, London: Verso. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Lipietz, A. 1992. Towards a New Economie Order. Postfordism, Ecology and Democracy, Oxford: OUP. London, New York: Polity Press |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Lipietz, A. 1995. “Capital‐labour relations at the dawn of XXIst century”. In Changing Production Relations: A Global Perspectioe, Edited by: Shor, D. and You, H. London: Edward Elgar. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
L'Oeil. November 1992. Budgets publics et redistribution spatiale, November, AURIF. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Page, E. Gain or Drain? London in the UK: a review of regional taxation and expenditures. Paper presented at the Conference Métropoles et Aménagement du Territoire . May12–13, Paris‐Dauphine. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Piore, M. and Sabel, R. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York: Basic Books. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Scott, A. 1992. “L'économie métropolitaine: organisation industrielle et croissance urbaine”. Edited by: Benko and Lipietz. (1992) |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Storper, M. and Walker, R. 1989. The Capitalist Imperative. Territory, Technology, and Industrial Growth, Oxford: Blackwell. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Veltz, P. 1992. “Hierarchies et réseaux dans l'organisation de la production et du territoire”. Edited by: Benko and Lipietz. (1992) |