Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Vollmer, Fred
Дата выпуска 1993
dc.description AbstractThe aim of the present paper is to find a satisfactory way of understanding what traits are. As a starting point, two recent accounts of the nature of traits, the act frequency approach and the intention frequency approach, are presented and discussed. The act frequency approach is criticized for taking all traits to be behavioral dispositions, and for not offering any explanation of behavior. The intention frequency approach is criticized for being equally one‐sided in regarding all traits as mental frequency dispositions. It is claimed that some traits are purely behavioral, that some are behavioral and mental, and that some are purely mental. Finally, it is argued that mental phenomena like beliefs and desires, the phenomena that make up reasons for and explain actions, are not frequency dispositions. They are dispositional properties of another kind, namely abilities, capacities or powers.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Название A theory of traits
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/09515089308573079
Electronic ISSN 1465-394X
Print ISSN 0951-5089
Журнал Philosophical Psychology
Том 6
Первая страница 67
Последняя страница 79
Аффилиация Vollmer, Fred; University of Bergen
Выпуск 1
Библиографическая ссылка Allport, G. 1961. Pattern and Growth in Personality, New York: Holt.
Библиографическая ссылка Alston, W.P. 1976. “Traits, consistency, and conceptual alternatives for personality theory”. In Personality, Edited by: Harré, R. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Библиографическая ссылка Andersson, G. and Radnitzky, G. 1984. Merits and limits of dispositional analysis. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 1: 199–204.
Библиографическая ссылка Baker, G.P. and Hacker, P.M.S. 1984. Language, Sense and Nonsense, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Библиографическая ссылка Block, J. 1989. Critique of the act frequency approach to personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56: 234–245.
Библиографическая ссылка Buss, D.M. and Craik, K.H. 1980. The frequency concept of disposition: dominance and prototypically dominant acts. Journal of Personality, 48: 379–392.
Библиографическая ссылка Buss, D.M. and Craik, K.H. 1983a. The dispositional analysis of everyday conduct. Journal of Personality, 51: 393–412.
Библиографическая ссылка Buss, D.M. and Craik, K.H. 1983b. The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90: 105–126.
Библиографическая ссылка Buss, D.M. and Craik, K.H. 1984. “Acts, dispositions, and personality”. In Progress in Experimental Personality Research, Edited by: Mäher, B.A. and Mäher, W.B. Vol. 13, 241–301. New York: Academic Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Buss, D.M. and Craik, K.H. 1985. Why not measure that trait? Alternative criteria for identifying important dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48: 934–946.
Библиографическая ссылка Churchland, P.M. 1988. Matter and Consciousness, Cambridge: MIT.
Библиографическая ссылка Davidson, D. 1982. Rational animals. Dialectica, 36: 317–327.
Библиографическая ссылка Dretske, F. 1988. Explaining Behavior. Reasons in a world of causes, Cambridge: MIT.
Библиографическая ссылка Dretske, F. Mental events as structuring causes. Conference on Mental Causation. Bielefeld, Germany.
Библиографическая ссылка Fletcher, G.J.O. 1984. Psychology and common sense. American Psychologist, 39: 203–213.
Библиографическая ссылка Fodor, J. 1975. The Language of Thought, New York: T.Y. Crowell.
Библиографическая ссылка Fodor, J. 1987. Psychosemantics, Cambridge: MIT.
Библиографическая ссылка Harré, R. 1983. Personal Being, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Библиографическая ссылка Harré, R. 1989. “Language games and texts of identity”. In Texts of Identity, Edited by: Shotter, J. and Gergen, K.J. London: Sage.
Библиографическая ссылка Harré, R. 1990. Explanation in psychology. Annals of theoretical psychology, 6: 105–124.
Библиографическая ссылка Greenwood, J.D. 1988. Agency, causality, and meaning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 18: 95–116.
Библиографическая ссылка Hirschberg, N. 1978. “A correct treatment of traits”. In Personality, a New Look at Metatheories, Edited by: London, H. New York: Wiley.
Библиографическая ссылка Mackie, J.L. 1977. Dispositions, grounds, and causes. Synthese, 34: 361–370.
Библиографическая ссылка Pervin, L.A. 1984. Persons, situations, interactions, and the future of personality. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 2: 339–344.
Библиографическая ссылка Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind, New York: Barnes & Noble.
Библиографическая ссылка Smedslund, J. 1984. What is necessarily true in psychology. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 2: 241–272.
Библиографическая ссылка Smedslund, J. 1988. Psychologic, New York: Springer.
Библиографическая ссылка Smolensky, P. 1988. On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11: 1–74.
Библиографическая ссылка Wakefteld, J.C. 1989. “Levels of explanation in personality theory”. In Personality Psychology, Recent Trends and Emerging Directions, Edited by: Buss, D.M. and Cantor, N. New York: Springer.
Библиографическая ссылка Weimer, W.B. 1984. Limitations of the dispositional analysis of behavior. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 1: 161–198.

Скрыть метаданые