Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Thomsen, Steen
Дата выпуска 2005
dc.description This paper examines the relationship between blockholder ownership, dividend policy and firm value in the largest EU and US companies during 1988–1998. Large owners may benefit other shareholders by effectively controlling company managers, but may also differ from minority investors by a preference for retained earnings, from which they derive private benefits of control. This paper analyses these effects in a non-technical way using simple correlation analysis. The level of blockholder ownership in continental Europe is found to be much higher than in the US/UK, whereas firm value is somewhat lower. A negative association is found between blockholder ownership and firm value in continental Europe, which indicates that the level of blockholder ownership is excessive from a minority shareholder viewpoint. Moreover, although blockholder ownership levels in Europe are not generally associated with lower dividends, increases in blockholder ownership are found to be associated with decreasing dividends, and the stock market appears to respond more favourably to increasing dividends in companies with a high level of blockholder ownership. In the US/UK, higher blockholder ownership is generally associated with lower dividends, which are again negatively correlated with firm value. In both the EU and the US, the results therefore point to conflicts of interest between large blockholders and minority investors, but more strongly so in Europe.
Издатель T.M.C. Asser Press
Тема ownership
Тема firm value
Тема dividends
Тема international corporate governance
Название Conflicts of Interest or Aligned Incentives? Blockholder Ownership, Dividends and Firm Value in the US and the EUThis paper is part of the research project on corporate governance of companies with concentrated ownership – GOCOW – funded by the Danish Social Science Research Council. It has benefited from the generous comments of Delia Ionascu, who could easily have been its co-author. I am grateful to Michael Emil Ollinger for research assistance.
DOI 10.1017/S1566752905002016
Electronic ISSN 1741-6205
Print ISSN 1566-7529
Журнал European Business Organization Law Review
Том 6
Первая страница 201
Последняя страница 225
Выпуск 2

Скрыть метаданые