| Автор | Johnston, Sue |
| Дата выпуска | 1996 |
| dc.description | AbstractIn Australia, the Committee for the Advancement of University Teaching (CAUT) was established in 1992 to provide funding to support teaching development projects. Many universities have supplemented this programme with similar internal schemes. Underlying the use of funding in this way is an assumption that innovative teaching ideas and materials will be developed by keen practitioners, and then will be disseminated to others who will adopt or adapt the innovation. The paper argues that the notion of dissemination is borrowed from scientific research and is an inappropriate way of conceptualizing innovation in university teaching. Suggestions are made about ways of encouraging innovation in teaching — suggestions which are based on a more adequate understanding of the way in which teaching practices change. |
| Формат | application.pdf |
| Издатель | Taylor & Francis Group |
| Копирайт | Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC |
| Название | Questioning the Concept of ‘Dissemination’ in the Process of University Teaching Innovation |
| Тип | research-article |
| DOI | 10.1080/1356251960010302 |
| Electronic ISSN | 1470-1294 |
| Print ISSN | 1356-2517 |
| Журнал | Teaching in Higher Education |
| Том | 1 |
| Первая страница | 295 |
| Последняя страница | 304 |
| Аффилиация | Johnston, Sue; Centre for the Enhancement of Learning, Teaching and Scholarship, University of Canberra |
| Выпуск | 3 |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Anwyl, J., Balla, M. and McInnis, C. 1992. Recognition of Teaching Performance in Promotion Procedures, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Australian Vice‐Chancellors’ Committee (AV‐CC). 1993. Guidelines for Effective University Teaching, Canberra: AV‐CC. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Becher, T. 1994. The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19: 151–161. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N. and Tarule, J. 1986. Women's Ways of Knowing: the development of self, voice, and mind, New York: Basic Books. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Boyer, E. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate, New Jersey: The Carnegie Foundation. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Brown, S. and McIntyre, D. 1993. Making Sense of Teaching, Buckingham: Open University Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Committee for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. 1995. Report on the 1994 Quality Review, Vol 1, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Committee for the Advancement of University Teaching (CAUT). 1995. Improving University Teaching 1995, Canberra: CAUT. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Havelock, R. 1970. Guide to Innovation in Education, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Miles, M., ed. 1964. Innovation in Education, New York: Teachers College Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Morrish, I. 1976. Aspects of Educational Change, London: George Allen & Unwin. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Ramsden, P. 1992. Learning to Teach in Higher Education, London: Routledge. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Ramsden, P., Margetson, D., Martin, E. and Clark, S. 1995. Recognising and Rewarding Good Teaching in Australian Higher Education, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Rogers, E. 1965. “What are Innovators Like?”. In Change Processes in Public Schools, Edited by: Carlson, R. Eugene: University of Oregon. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Ross, R., Cornett, J. and McCutcheon, G., eds. 1992. Teacher Personal Theorizing, Albany: State University of New York. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Russell, T. and Munby, H., eds. 1992. Teachers and Teaching: from classroom to reflection, London: Falmer Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Schön, D. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the profession, San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Yinger, R. 1987. Learning the langauge of practice. Curriculum Inquiry, 17: 293–318. |
