Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Mosimann, James E.
Автор Wiseman, Claire V.
Автор Edelman, Ruth E.
Дата выпуска 1995
dc.description Many people have difficulty in generating random numbers. This difficulty suggests that potentially fabricated numbers encountered in investigations of scientific misconduct be examined for nonrandom behavior. The present paper shows that even with a conscious effort to construct random digits, many subjects are unable to produce digits with a uniform distribution. For this study, subjects were directed to try to produce random digits in three places in order to fabricate a series of “pick 3”; lottery numbers. Subjects were most successful at producing a random (uniform) distribution of digits for the leftmost place; however, success at one place was not associated with success at another. In addition, subjects did not select all digits with equal frequency. Of 8,280 digits chosen in this study, the order from most to least chosen was 1, 2, 3, 6, 4, 9, 7, 0, 8, 5. Finally, no strong correlations among subjects’ digit choices were found. The conscious effort by these subjects to produce random digits stands in contrast with the usual case of data fabrication in which the fabricator must devote a conscious effort to choose leftmost digits so the number has the magnitude desired and pays little or no attention to the fact that the rightmost digits should be random. The results of the present paper indicate that even if a data‐fabricator were aware that error digits would be examined for uniformity, success in constructing uniform error distributions is not guaranteed. The difficulty that people have in creating random error digits supports the utility of examining such digits in investigations of scientific misconduct.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Тема scientific misconduct
Тема scientific fraud
Тема data fabrication
Тема random digits
Тема uniform distribution
Тема multinomial distribution
Тема Dirichlet distribution
Тема Dirichlet‐multinomial distribution
Название Data fabrication: Can people generate random digits?
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/08989629508573866
Electronic ISSN 1545-5815
Print ISSN 0898-9621
Журнал Accountability in Research
Том 4
Первая страница 31
Последняя страница 55
Аффилиация Mosimann, James E.; Senior Biostatistician, Office of Research Integrity, Public Health Service; Department of Mathematics and Statistics and Department of Psychology, The American University
Аффилиация Wiseman, Claire V.; Department of Psychology, Yale Center for Eating and Weight Disorders
Аффилиация Edelman, Ruth E.; Ph.D. candidate, Clinical Psychology program, The American University
Выпуск 1
Библиографическая ссылка Benford, E. 1938. The law of anomalous numbers. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc, 18: 551–572.
Библиографическая ссылка Broad, W. and Wade, N. 1982. Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in the Halls of Science, New York: Simon and Schuster.
Библиографическая ссылка Budescu, D.V. 1987. A markov model for generation of random binary sequences. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13: 25–39.
Библиографическая ссылка Campbell, G. and Mosimann, J.E. Multivariate analysis of size and shape: Modelling with the Dirichlet Distribution. Computer Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the Nineteenth Symposium on the Interface. Edited by: Heiberger, R. M. pp.93–101.
Библиографическая ссылка Chapanis, A. 1953. Random‐number guessing behavior. American Psychologist, 8: 332 (abstract)
Библиографическая ссылка Davis, E J. 1964. “Gamma function and related functions”. In Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Applied Mathematics Series 55 Edited by: Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. 253–293. National Bureau of Standards.
Библиографическая ссылка Diaconis, P. 1977. The distribution of leading digits and uniform distribution mod 1. The Annals of Probability, 5: 72–81.
Библиографическая ссылка Dixon, W.J. and Massey, F.J. Jr. 1983. Introduction to Statistical Analysis, , Fourth Edition, New York: McGraw‐Hill.
Библиографическая ссылка Falk, R. The perception of randomness. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Psychology of Mathematical Education. Grenoble, France. pp.222–229.
Библиографическая ссылка 1989. Federal Register, 54(151) August 8: 32449 Tuesday
Библиографическая ссылка Feller, W. 1966. An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Vol II, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
Библиографическая ссылка Heywood, S. 1972. The popular number seven or number preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34: 357–358.
Библиографическая ссылка Hill, T.P. 1988. Random number guessing and the first digit phenomenom. Psychological Reports, 62: 967–971.
Библиографическая ссылка House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. Fraud in NIH grant programs: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives. 100th Cong., 2nd sess. April121988. Washington DC: United States Congress.
Библиографическая ссылка House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. Scientific fraud: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives. 101st Cong., 1st sess. May4 and 91989. Washington DC: United States Congress.
Библиографическая ссылка House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. Maintaining the integrity of scientific research: Summary of a hearing before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations transmitted to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, House of Representatives. 101st Cong., 2nd sess. Washington DC: United States Congress.
Библиографическая ссылка James, I.R. and Mosimann, J.E. 1980. A new characterization of the Dirichlet distribution through neutrality. Annals of Statistics, 8: 183–189.
Библиографическая ссылка Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1972. Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3: 430–454.
Библиографическая ссылка Lopes, L.L. 1982. Doing the impossible: A note on induction and the experience, of randomness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8: 626–636.
Библиографическая ссылка Melendez. 1966. Number preference as a variable influencing human Ss inability to generate a truly random series of numbers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23: 1201–1202.
Библиографическая ссылка Miller, David J. and Hersen, M. 1992. Research Fraud in the Behavioral and Biomedical Sciences, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Библиографическая ссылка Mosimann, J.E. 1962. On the compound multinomial distribution, the multivariate Beta Distribution and correlations between proportions. Biometrika, 49: 65–82.
Библиографическая ссылка Mosimann, J.E. 1963. On the compound negative multinomial distribution and correlations among inversely sampled pollen counts. Biometrika, 50: 47–54.
Библиографическая ссылка Mosimann, J.E. 1970. “Discrete distribution models arising in pollen studies”. In Random Counts in Scientific Work, Volume 3. Random Counts in Physical Sciences, Geoscience and Business, Edited by: Patil, G. E. 1–30. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park Pennsylvania.
Библиографическая ссылка Mosimann, J.E. and Ratnaparkhi, M. V. 1994. Folded rectangular distributions on finite intervals (unpublished manuscript)
Библиографическая ссылка National Academy of Sciences. 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, Volume I, Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Библиографическая ссылка National Institutes of Health. 1992. NIH Data Book, 2Bethesda, MD: NIH.
Библиографическая ссылка Office of Research Integrity. 1993. ORI Newsletter Volume 1, No. 4, 4Rockville, MD bottom of first column and second column).
Библиографическая ссылка Patil, G.P., Boswell, M.T., Joshi, S.W. and Ratnaparkhi, M.V. 1984. Dictionary and Classified Bibliography of Statistical Distributions in Scientific Work, Volume 1, Discrete Models, 106Burtonsville, MD: International Co‐operative Publishing House.
Библиографическая ссылка Preece, D.A. 1981. Distributions of final digits in data. The Statistician, 30: 31–60.
Библиографическая ссылка Rao, C.R. 1989. Statistics and Truth, Burtonsville, MD: International Co‐operative Publishing House. Lecture 2 and Appendix)
Библиографическая ссылка Ross, B.M. and Levy, N. 1958. Patterned predictions of chance events by children and adults. Psychological Reports, 4: 87–124.
Библиографическая ссылка Rosenberg, S., Weber, N., Crocq, M., Duval, F. and Macher. 1990. Random number generation by normal, alcoholics and schizophrenic subjects. Psychological Medicine, 20: 953–960.
Библиографическая ссылка Sarasohn, Judy. 1993. Science on Trial: The Whistle‐blower, the Accused, and the Nobel Laureate, New York: St. Martin's Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Tune, G.S. 1964a. A brief survey of variables that influence random‐generation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 18: 705–710.
Библиографическая ссылка Tune, G.S. 1964b. Response preferences: A review of some relevant literature. Psychological Bulletin, 4: 286–302.
Библиографическая ссылка Wagenaar. 1972. Generation of random sequences by human subjects: A critical survey of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 77: 65–72.
Библиографическая ссылка Weiss, R.L. 1964. On producing random responses. Psychological Reports, 14: 931–941.
Библиографическая ссылка Winick, C. 1962. Preference for individual digits. Journal of General Psychology, 67: 271–281.
Библиографическая ссылка Yule, G. Udny. 1927. On reading a scale. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 90: 570–587.

Скрыть метаданые