Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Pritchard, Michael S.
Дата выпуска 1995
dc.description This paper explores standards of accountability in philosophical research, particularly in relation to publication. The responsibility of researchers, editors, reviewers, and other scholars are discussed. Problems receiving special attention include: pressure to publish in order to obtain jobs, tenure, promotion, or merit pay; standards of quality; acknowledgement of the work of others; plagiarism; fabrication; distinguishing honest from careless misinterpretation; validation of empirical claims that underlie philosophical positions; and difficulties in detecting misconduct in philosophical research. The importance of self‐monitoring and moral character is stressed.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Тема Accountability
Тема authorship
Тема character
Тема competence
Тема credit
Тема editors
Тема empirical claims
Тема fabrication
Тема misinterpretation
Тема philosophers
Тема plagiarizing
Тема publication
Тема quality control
Тема research
Тема responsibilities
Тема scholars
Тема tenure
Название Accountability in philosophical research
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/08989629508573871
Electronic ISSN 1545-5815
Print ISSN 0898-9621
Журнал Accountability in Research
Том 4
Первая страница 91
Последняя страница 102
Аффилиация Pritchard, Michael S.; Department of Philosophy, Western Michigan University
Выпуск 2
Библиографическая ссылка Cahn, Steven. 1994. “Scholarship and Service,”. In Saints and Scamps, , Revised Edition, 45–53. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Ch. 3
Библиографическая ссылка Baum, Archie, ed. 1993. Directory of American Philosophers, 1994–5, , 17th Edition, 206–231. Bowling Green, OH: Philosophy Documentation Center.
Библиографическая ссылка 1994. American Philosophical Quarterly, 31(1) January: 87
Библиографическая ссылка 1972. Ethics, 82(4) July
Библиографическая ссылка Lehrer, Keith. 1989. Thomas Reid, New York: Routledge.
Библиографическая ссылка Moore, G. E. 1959. Philosophical Papers, 32–59. New York: Collier Books.
Библиографическая ссылка Kant, Immanuel. 1950. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, Edited by: Beck, Lewis White. 6New York: Bobbs‐Merrill.
Библиографическая ссылка Smith, Quentin. “Marcus, Kripke, and the Origin of the New Theory of Reference,”. presented in December, 1994, at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Division of the American Philosophical Association. Boston, Massachusetts.
Библиографическая ссылка McDowell, Edwin. 1984. “A Book on Philosophy Poses Moral Dilemma,”;. New York Times, September 13
Библиографическая ссылка 1984. “Random Drops Book After Forgery,”;. New York Times, November 2
Библиографическая ссылка Goldman, Alvin. 1993. Philosophical Applications of the Cognitive Sciences, Boulder, CO: West‐view Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Goldman, Alvin, ed. 1993. Readings in Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Hardimon, Michael O. 1994. “Role Obligations,”;. Journal of Philosophy, XCI(7) July: 333–363.
Библиографическая ссылка May, William, F. 1988. “Professional Virtue and Self‐Regulation,”. In Ethical Issues in Professional Life Edited by: Callahan, Joan. 408New York, Oxford

Скрыть метаданые