Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Grobar, Lisa M.
Автор Stern, Robert M.
Автор Deardorff, Alan V.
Дата выпуска 1990
dc.description We have used the Michigan Model of World Production and Trade to assess the impact of exports and imports of armaments (based on 1980 data) on sectoral trade and employment and other economic variables in the major Western trading countries. If the United States were to place a unilateral embargo on its arms exports and imports, we calculate that it would experience a comparatively small amount of employment displacement in the aggregate and that most of this displacement would occur in the transport equipment and electric machinery sectors. If all the major Western countries were to place a multilateral embargo on their arms trade, the sectoral effects on the United States would be similarly small. But the sectoral effects in several other industrialized and developing countries measured as a percentage of sectoral employment, would be larger, indicating potential short‐run adjustment problems in labor markets in some cases.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Тема International arms trade
Тема economic effects of US unilateral arms trade embargo
Тема multilateral arms trade embargo
Тема general equilibrium modeling of arms trade embargo
Название The economic effects of international trade in armaments in the major western industrialized and developing countries
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/10430719008404654
Print ISSN 1043-0717
Журнал Defence Economics
Том 1
Первая страница 97
Последняя страница 120
Аффилиация Grobar, Lisa M.; Department of Economics, California State University
Аффилиация Stern, Robert M.; Department of Economics, Brandeis University
Аффилиация Deardorff, Alan V.; Department of Economics, The University of Michigan
Выпуск 2
Библиографическая ссылка Ball, N. and Leitenberg, M., eds. 1983. The Structure of the Defense Industry, London: Croom Helm.
Библиографическая ссылка Brown, D. K. and Stern, R. M. 1989. “US‐Canada bilateral tariff elimination: The role of product differentiation and market structure”. In Trade Policies for International Competitiveness, Edited by: Feenstra, R. C. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Deardorff, A. V. and Stern, R. M. 1986. The Michigan Model of World Production and Trade: Theory and Applications, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Glismann, H. H. and Horn, E‐J. 1988. International arms trade: Revealed political preferences or cartel behaviour?, Kiel Working Paper No. 318 The Kiel Institute of World Economics.
Библиографическая ссылка Grimmett, R. F. Trends in conventional arms transfers to the Third World by major supplier, 1980–1987. CRS Report for Congress 88–352 F. Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress.
Библиографическая ссылка Grobar, L. M. and Stern, R. M. 1989. A data set on international trade in armaments for the Western industrialized and developing countries for 1980: Sources and methodological issues. Weltwirtscharftliches Archiv, forthcoming
Библиографическая ссылка Johansen, L. 1960. A Multi‐Sectoral Study of Economic Growth, Amsterdam: North‐Holland.
Библиографическая ссылка Leontief, W. and Duchin, F. 1983. Military Spending, New York: Oxford University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Stern, R. M., Francis, J. and Schumacher, B. F. 1976. Price Elasticities in International Trade, London: Macmillan Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). World Armaments and Disarmament Yearbook, United Nations. Yearbook of International Trade Statistics
Библиографическая ссылка United States Agency for Arms Control and Disarmament (ACDA). World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers
Библиографическая ссылка Whalley, J. 1984. Trade Liberalization Among Major World Trading Areas, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Zarembka, P. and Chernicoff, H. 1973. Further results on the empirical relevance of the CES production function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 53: 106–110.

Скрыть метаданые