Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Mueller, Michael J.
Автор Atesoglu, H. Sonmez
Дата выпуска 1993
dc.description A two sector neo‐classical growth model of the economy composed of a civilian and a defense sector with technological change in both sectors and with defense acting as an externality in the civilian sector is presented. The inclusion of technological change separates the effect of defense spending into two components, the change in the rate of defense spending and the relative size of the defense sector. Estimation shows that a change in defense spending has a positive and significant effect on the growth rate of the economy and that both defense effects are individually significant.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Тема Defense spending
Тема technological change
Тема economic growth
Тема defense externality
Название Defense spending, technological change, and economic growth in the United States
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/10430719308404765
Print ISSN 1043-0717
Журнал Defence Economics
Том 4
Первая страница 259
Последняя страница 269
Аффилиация Mueller, Michael J.; Department of Finance and Economics, Georgia Southern University
Аффилиация Atesoglu, H. Sonmez; Department of Economics and Finance, Clarkson University
Выпуск 3
Библиографическая ссылка Adams, G. and Gold, D. 1987. Defense Spending and the Economy: Does the Defense Dollar Make a Difference?, Washington, DC: Defense Budget Project.
Библиографическая ссылка Alexander, W.R.J. 1990. The Impact of Defense Spending on Economic Growth. Defence Economics, 2(1): 39–55.
Библиографическая ссылка Atesoglu, H.S. and Mueller, M.J. 1990. Defense Spending and Economic Growth. Defence Economics, 2(1): 19–27.
Библиографическая ссылка Chan, S. 1985. The Impact of Defense Spending on Economic Performance: A Survey of Evidence and Problems. Orbis, 29(2): 403–34.
Библиографическая ссылка Feder, G. 1983. On Exports and Economic Growth. Journal of Development Economics, 12(1/2): 59–73.
Библиографическая ссылка Huang, C. and Mintz, A. 1990. Ridge Regression Analysis of the Defense‐Growth Tradeoff in the United States. Defence Economics, 2(1): 29–37.
Библиографическая ссылка Huang, C. and Mintz, A. 1991. Defense Expenditures and Economic Growth: the Externality Effect. Defence Economics, 3(1): 35–40.
Библиографическая ссылка Lindgren, G. 1984. Review Assay: Armaments and Economic Performance in Industrialized Market Economies. Journal of Peace Research, 21(4): 375–87.
Библиографическая ссылка Mintz, A. and Huang, C. 1990. Defense Expenditures, Economic Growth, and the “Peace Dividend”. American Political Science Review, 84(4): 1283–93.
Библиографическая ссылка Mueller, M.J. and Atesoglu, H.S. 1992. “A Theory of Defense Spending and Economic Growth”. In Defense Spending and Economic Growth, Edited by: Payne, J.E. and Sahu, A.P. Boulder, CO.: Westview. forthcoming.
Библиографическая ссылка Ram, R. 1986. Government Size and Economic Growth: A New Framework and Some Evidence from Cross Section and Time Series Data. American Economic Review, 76(1): 191–203.
Библиографическая ссылка Solow, R.M. 1957. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3): 312–20.
Библиографическая ссылка Ward, M.D. 1991. Military Spending in India. Defence Economics, 3(1): 41–63.

Скрыть метаданые