Автор |
Durbach, Miriam |
Автор |
Pence, Alan R. |
Дата выпуска |
1991 |
dc.description |
Although the popular and general professional literature concerning the integration of preschoolers with special needs into community‐based settings is supportive of such efforts, remarkably little information is available regarding the use and production of language by these young children in integrated versus segregated settings. The opportunity for an exploratory study of the language production of children attending, on a partial week basis, both a segregated centre and integrated community centres became available at a Canadian program in Victoria, B.C. Through the cooperative efforts of a program‐based speech and language pathologist and a university‐based child care researcher, a small n [5 children], observationally based study was undertaken.The children were videotaped in both settings during a free play period as well as during an adult‐directed activity. The results, with each child serving as his or her own control, indicated that three of the children were mo verbally productive in the segregated setting during free play periods, und in the integrated community settings for the teacher directed [structured] activity. One child was more productive overall in the specialised segregated setting, and one was more productive overall in the integrated community setting. Concluding remarks underscore the need for continuing research efforts in this area of inquiry. |
Формат |
application.pdf |
Издатель |
Taylor & Francis Group |
Копирайт |
Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC |
Тема |
Mainstreaming |
Тема |
language deficit |
Название |
A comparison of language production skills of preschoolers with special needs in segregated and integrated settings |
Тип |
research-article |
DOI |
10.1080/0300443910680106 |
Electronic ISSN |
1476-8275 |
Print ISSN |
0300-4430 |
Журнал |
Early Child Development and Care |
Том |
68 |
Первая страница |
49 |
Последняя страница |
69 |
Аффилиация |
Durbach, Miriam; Department of Communications Disorders, Arbutus Society for Children |
Аффилиация |
Pence, Alan R.; School of Child and Youth Care, University of Victoria |
Выпуск |
1 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Bates, E. 1975. “Peer relations and the acquisition of language”. In Friendship & peer relations, Edited by: Lewis, M. and Rosenblum, L.A. New York: John Wiley & Sons. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Bishop, D.V.M. “University of Newcastle Upon Tyne”. In Test for reception of grammar [TROG], England: Department of Speech. [n.d.]. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Blank, M., Rose, S.A. and Berlin, L. 1978. Preschool language assessment instrument [PLAI], Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton Inc. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Bloom, L. and Lahey, M. 1978. Language development & language disorders, New York: John Wiley & Sons. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Bricker, D. 1978. “A rationale for the integration of handicapped and non‐handicapped preschool children”. In Intervention and the integration of handicapped children, Edited by: Guralnick, M.J. Baltimore:University Park Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Brown, R. 1973. A first language, the early stages, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Carrow‐Woolfolk, E. 1985. Test for auditory comprehension of language‐Revised [TACL], Texas: DLM Teaching Resources. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Coggins, T.E., Olswang, L.B. and Guthrie, J. 1987. Assessing communicative intents in young children: Low structured observations or elicitation tasks. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 52([1]): 45–50. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Dunlop, K., Stoneman, Z. and Cantrell, M.L. 1980. Social interaction of exceptional and other children in a mainstreamed preschool. Exceptional Children, 47: 132–141. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Edgington, E.S. 1986. “Randomization tests”. In Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, Edited by: Kotz, S. and Johnson, N.L. Vol. 7, 530–538. New York: John Wiley. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Faught, K.K., Balleweg, B.J., Crew, R.E. and Van Der Pol, R.A. 1983. An analysis of social behaviors among handicapped and nonhandicapped preschool children. Education & Training of the Mentally Retarded, 18: 210–214. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Fenrick, N.J., Pearson, M.E. and Pepelenyck, K. 1984. The play, attending and language of young handicapped children in integrated and segregated settings. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 8([1]): 57–67. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Gil, L. 1984. Integrating normally developing and handicapped infants and toddlers into a child care program ERIC Document Number 246 587. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Guralnick, M.J. 1976. The value of integrating handicapped and nonhandicapped preschool children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 46: 236–245. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Guralnick, M.J. and Paul‐Brown, D. 1977. The nature of verbal interactions among handicapped and nonhandicapped preschool children. Child Development, 48([1]): 254–260. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Guralnick, M.J. and Groom, J.M. 1988. Peer interactions in mainstreamed and specialized classrooms: A comparative analysis. Exceptional Children, 54([5]): 415–425. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Hamilton, M.L. and Stewart, D.M. 1977. Peer models and language acquisition. Merrill‐Palmer Quarterly, 23([1]): 45–55. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Hamilton, W.W. 1978. “Peer interaction and the process of socialization”. In Early intervention and the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children, Edited by: Guralnick, M.J. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Hedrick, D.L., Prather, E. and Tobin, A. 1984. Sequenced Inventory of Communication Development‐‐Revised edition [SICD], Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Honig, A.S. and McCarron, P.A. 1988. Prosocial behavior of handicapped and typical peers in an integrated preschool. Early Child Development and Care, 33: 113–125. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Jenkins, J.R., Speltz, M.L. and Odom, S.L. 1985. Integrating normal and handicapped preschoolers: Effects on child development and social interaction. Exceptional Children, 52([1]): 7–17. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Kaplan‐Sanoff, M. The issue of mainstreamiang: Its effects in the preschool. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. New York, NY. September. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Kysela, G., Barios, S., Grigg, N. and Karee, M. 1984. Integration in early learning environments. Canadian Journal for Exceptional Children, 1: 10–17. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Marshall, L., Keating, R., McDonald, L. and Smart, F. 1986. Preschool integration: An experimental classroom. Canadian Journal for Exceptional Children, 3([1]): 15–22. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
May, R.B., Masson, M.E. and Hunter, M.A. 1989. Randomization tests: viable alternatives to normal curve tests. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 21: 482–483. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
McLean, J. and Snyder‐McLean, L. 1978. A transactional approach to early language training, Columbus, OH: Charles & Merrill. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Odom, S.L. and Speltz, M.L. 1983. Program variations in preschools for handicapped and nonhandicapped children: Mainstream vs. integrated special education. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 3: 89–104. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Roth, F. and Clark, D. 1987. Symbolic play and social participation abilities of language impaired and normally developing children. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 52([1]): 17–27. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Spradlin, J.E. and Siegel, G.M. 1982. Language training in natural & clinical environments. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 47([1]): 2–7. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Wellen, C.J. 1984. Effects of older siblings on the language young children hear and produce. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 50([1]): 84–96. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Wetherby, A.M., Cain, D.H., Yonclas, D.G. and Walker, V.G. 1988. Analysis of intentional communication of normal children from the prelinguistic to the multiword stage. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 31([2]): 240–252. |