Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Krishnan, Vijaya
Дата выпуска 1990
dc.description AbstractThis paper tests, within the framework of LISREL, the causal structures of fertility using data from the 1973–74 Growth of Alberta Family Study (GAFS) of women aged 18–44 who are currently married or living common‐law. Differential fertility among two groups of women classified by nativity also are examined. The women's background characteristics (e.g., age, religiosity, and education) are viewed as exogenous variables. The endogenous variables are familism and expected family size; familism is designated as an intermediate variable in the model, linking demographic and socioeconomic (including cultural) factors to fertility. The results indicate that familism acts as an important variable explaining fertility, particularly, among foreign‐bom women. The study confirms and extends earlier research findings that religiosity and education influence couples’ fertility, the former positively and the latter negatively.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Название A causal approach to the study of fertility and Familism
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/19485565.1990.9988747
Electronic ISSN 1948-5573
Print ISSN 1948-5565
Журнал Biodemography and Social Biology
Том 37
Первая страница 59
Последняя страница 68
Аффилиация Krishnan, Vijaya; Department of Sociology, University of Alberta
Выпуск 1-2
Библиографическая ссылка Becker, Gary. 1960. “An economic analysis of fertility”. In Demographic and economic change in developed countries, Edited by: National Bureau of Economic Research. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 1981. A treatise on the family, Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Bell, Wendell. 1968. “The city, the suburb and a theory of social choice”. In The new urbanization, Edited by: Greer, Scott. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Blake, Judith. 1968. Are babies consumer durables? A critique of the economic theory of reproduction and motivation. Pop. Stud, 22: 5–25.
Библиографическая ссылка Bongaarts, J. 1978. A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Pop. Develop. Rev, 4: 105–132.
Библиографическая ссылка Burch, T. K. 1966. The fertility of North American Catholics: A comparative overview. Demography, 3: 174–87.
Библиографическая ссылка Cochrane, Susan H. 1983. “Effects of education and urbanization on fertility”. In Determinants of fertility in developing countries, Edited by: Bulato, Rodolfo A. and Lee, Ronald. Vol. 2, New York: Academic Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Easterlin, Richard A., Behrman, S. J. and Corsa, L. Jr. 1969. “Toward a socio‐economic theory of fertility: Survey of recent research on economic factors in American fertility”. In Fertility and family planning, Edited by: Freedman, R. Ann Arbor: A world view. Univ. of Michigan Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Felson, Marcus and Solaun, Mauricio. 1975. The fertility‐inhibiting effect of crowded apartment living in a tight housing market. Amer. J. Sociol, 80(6): 1410–1427.
Библиографическая ссылка Freedman, Ronald. 1975. The sociology of human fertility, New York: John Wiley.
Библиографическая ссылка Freedman, Ronald, Whelpton, P. K. and Smith, John W. 1961. Family growth in metropolitan America, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Grindstaff, C. F. 1975. The baby bust: Changes in fertility patterns in Canada. Canad. Stud. Pop, 2: 15–22.
Библиографическая ссылка Heer, David M. 1968. Population and society, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice‐Hall.
Библиографическая ссылка Hill, R. and Lin, William T. 1966. “The significance of the family in population research”. In Family and fertility, Notre Dame: Univ. of Notre Dame Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Jones, E. F. and Westoff, C. F. 1979. The end of “Catholic” fertility. Demography, 16: 209–218.
Библиографическая ссылка Jorskog, K. G. and Sorböm, D. 1982. Recent developments in structural equation modelling. J. Market. Res, 19: 404–416.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 1986. LISREL VI: Analysis of structural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least square methods, Mooresville, Indiana: Scientific Software Inc..
Библиографическая ссылка Krishnan, P. and Krotki, Karol J. 1976. Growth of Alberta Families Study (GAFS): A report to Health and Welfare Canada on questionnaires collected from 1045 women of Edmonton in the Winter of 1973–74, Alberta: Population Research Laboratory, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
Библиографическая ссылка Krishnan, Vijaya. 1988. Homeownership: Its impact on fertility, Discussion Paper No. 51 University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta: Population Research Laboratory.
Библиографическая ссылка Kunz, P. 1965. The relation of income and fertility. J. Marr. Fam, 27: 509–513.
Библиографическая ссылка Ladewig, Becky H. and McGee, Gail W. 1986. Occupational commitment, a supportive family environment, and marital adjustment: Development and estimation of a model. J. Marr. Fam, 48: 821–829.
Библиографическая ссылка Merton, R. K. 1948. “The social psychology of housing”. In Current trends in social psychology, Edited by: Dennis, W. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Mitchell, David F. and Pratto, David J. 1977. Social class, familism, interest in children, and childbearing: A preliminary test of a “commitment” model of fertility. Soc. Biol, 24(1): 17–30.
Библиографическая ссылка Morris, Earl W. 1977. Mobility, fertility and residential crowding. Sociol. Soc. Res, 61(3): 363–379.
Библиографическая ссылка Nam, Charles B. 1968. Population and society, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co..
Библиографическая ссылка Namboodiri, N. Krishnan. 1972a. Some observations on the economic framework for fertility analysis. Pop. Stud, 26: 185–206.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 19726. The integrative potential of a fertility model: An analytical test. Pop. Stud, 26: 465–485.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 1974. Which couples at given parties expect to have additional births? An exercise in discriminant analysis. Demography, 11(1): 45–56.
Библиографическая ссылка Population Council, The. 1970. A manual for survey of fertility and family planning: Knowledge, attitudes, and practice, New York: The Population Council.
Библиографическая ссылка Rich, William. 1973. Smaller families through social and economic progress, Washington, D.C.: Monograph No. 7. Overseas Development Council.
Библиографическая ссылка Scanzoni, John H. 1975. Sex roles, life styles and childbearing, Glencoe, N.Y.: Free Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Smith‐Lovin, Lynn and Tickamyer, Ann R. 1978. Nonrecursive models of labor force participation, fertility behavior and sex role attitudes. Amer. Sociol. Rev, 43: 541–557.
Библиографическая ссылка Smith, S. K. 1981. Determinants of female labor force participation and family size in Mexico City. Econ. Devel. Cult. Chnge, 30: 129–152.
Библиографическая ссылка Turchi, Boone A. 1975. The demand for children, Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger Publishing Co..
Библиографическая ссылка Waite, Linda J., Goldscheider, Frances Kobrin and Witsberger, Christina. 1986. Nonfamily living. Amer. Sociol. Rev, 51(4): 541–554.
Библиографическая ссылка Westoff, C. E., Potter, R. G., Sagi, P. C. and Mishler, E. G. 1961. Family growth in metropolitan America, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Westoff, L. A. and Westoff, C. F. 1971. From now to zero—Fertility, contraception, and abortion in America, Boston: Little Brown and Company.

Скрыть метаданые