Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Dombrowski, Paul M.
Дата выпуска 1992
dc.description In my technical writing class, I examine two “meanings” from the Challenger disaster to illustrate the social contingency of meaning even in science and technology. These instances are the “anomalous” charring of the O‐rings and the reconceptualized assumption of flightworthiness the night before the launch. The social contingency of these meanings shows that the “object” of technical communication is not the material object as a pre‐existent isolate but in its social interpretation, significance, and meaning. Ultimately, technical communication is about people communicating about and to the interests of other people.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Название Challenger and the social contingency of meaning: Two lessons for the technical communication classroom
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/10572259209359507
Electronic ISSN 1542-7625
Print ISSN 1057-2252
Журнал Technical Communication Quarterly
Том 1
Первая страница 73
Последняя страница 86
Аффилиация Dombrowski, Paul M.; Teaches technical writing, teaching technical writing, and literature, Ohio University
Выпуск 3
Библиографическая ссылка Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science., Madison: U of Wisconsin P.
Библиографическая ссылка Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge., Garden City: Doubleday.
Библиографическая ссылка Burke, Kenneth. 1966. Language as Symbolic Action., Berkeley: U of California P.
Библиографическая ссылка Dobrin, David. 1983. What's Technical About Technical Writing. New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, Practice, Edited by: Anderson, Paul V., Brockmann, R. John and Miller, Carolyn R. Farmingdale: Baywood.
Библиографическая ссылка Dombrowski, Paul M. 1991. “The Lessons of the Challenger Disaster.”. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 34: 211–16.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 1989. “People or Procedures?: Ethical Lessons of the Challenger Disaster.”. Conference of The Society for the Social Studies of Science. Dec.1989, Irvine, CA.
Библиографическая ссылка Feyerabend, Paul. 1988. Against Method., New York: Verso.
Библиографическая ссылка Geertz, Clifford. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author., Stanford: Stanford UP.
Библиографическая ссылка Gouran, Dennis S., Hirokawa, Randy Y. and Martz, Amy E. 1986. “A Critical Analysis of Factors Related to Decisional Processes Involved in the Challenger Disaster.”. Central States Speech Journal., 37: 119–135.
Библиографическая ссылка Halloran, S. Michael. 1978. “Eloquence in a Technological Society.”. Central States Speech Journal, 29: 221–27.
Библиографическая ссылка Halloran, S. Michael and Whitburn, Merrill. 1982. “Ciceronian Rhetoric and the Rise of Science: The Plain Style Reconsidered.”. In The Rhetorical Tradition and Modern Writing., Edited by: Murphy, James J. New York: The Modern Language Association.
Библиографическая ссылка Herndl, Carl G., Fennell, Barabara A. and Miller, Carolyn R. 1991. “Understanding Failures in Organizational Discourse: The Accidents at Three Mile Island and the Shuttle”. In Challenger” Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies in Writing in Professional Communities., Edited by: Bazeran, Charles and Paradis, James. 279–305. Madison: U of Wisconsin P.
Библиографическая ссылка Journet, Debra. 1990. “Writing, Rhetoric, and the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge.”. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication., 33: 162–67.
Библиографическая ссылка Knorr‐Cetina, Karina. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science., Oxford: Pergamon.
Библиографическая ссылка Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society., Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Библиографическая ссылка LeFevre, Karen Burke. Invention as a Social Act. Published for the Conference on College Composition and Communication. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.
Библиографическая ссылка Miller, Carolyn. 1979. “A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing.”. College English, 40: 610–617.
Библиографическая ссылка Myers, Greg. 1990. Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge., Madison: U of Wisconsin P.
Библиографическая ссылка Pace, Roger C. 1988. “Technical Communication, Group Differentiation, and the Decision to Launch the Space Shuttle Challenger.”. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 18: 207–220.
Библиографическая ссылка Perrow, Charles. 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High‐Risk Technologies., New York: Basic Books.
Библиографическая ссылка United States. Cong. House. Investigation of the Challenger Accident: Report of the Committee on Science and Technology. House of Representatives, Ninety‐ninth Congress. 87–4033. Washington, DC: GPO.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 1986. “Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident”. In Report to the President by the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident. 86–16083., Washington, DC: GPO.
Библиографическая ссылка Winsor, Dorothy A. 1988. “Communication Failures Contributing to the Challenger Accident.”. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 31: 101–107.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 1990. “The Construction of Knowledge in Organizations: Asking the Right Questions about the Challenger.”. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 4: 7–20.
Библиографическая ссылка Zappen, James P. 1989. “The Discourse Community in Scientific and Technical Communication: Institutional and Social Views.”. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 19: 1–11.

Скрыть метаданые