Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Levine, Timothy R.
Автор McCornack, Steven A.
Автор Avery, Penny Baldwin
Дата выпуска 1992
dc.description This study explores sex differences in perceptions of discovered deception, and the subsequent emotional reactions that are experienced by relational partners. Drawing upon research examining deception, relational communication, and gender, several hypotheses were developed and tested in a sample of 190 respondents who had recently discovered the lie of a friend or romantic partner. The data were consistent with the hypotheses. Women were more likely than men to rate lying as an unacceptable form of behavior within both friendship and romantic relationships. In addition, women rated the act of lying (regardless of what was lied about) as more significant, and reported more negative emotional reactions upon discovering deception than did men. Generalized communicative suspicion functioned to enhance the intensity of emotional reactions for women, but not for men. Implications of the current results for the study of deception are discussed.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Тема Gender
Тема deception
Тема lying
Тема negative communication
Тема relational communication
Тема suspicion
Название Sex differences in emotional reactions to discovered deception
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/01463379209369843
Electronic ISSN 1746-4102
Print ISSN 0146-3373
Журнал Communication Quarterly
Том 40
Первая страница 289
Последняя страница 296
Аффилиация Levine, Timothy R.; Visiting Instructor in the Department of Speech Communication, Indiana University
Аффилиация McCornack, Steven A.; Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication, Michigan State University
Аффилиация Avery, Penny Baldwin; Doctoral candidate in the Department of Communication, Michigan State University
Выпуск 3
Библиографическая ссылка Aune, R. K., Metts, S. and Ebesu, A. S. Managing the outcomes of discovered deception. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association. Atlanta. November.
Библиографическая ссылка Cody, M. J. and O'Hair, H. D. 1983. Nonverbal communication and deception: Differences in deception cues due to gender and communicator dominance. Communication Monographs, 50: 175–192.
Библиографическая ссылка Comadena, M. E. 1982. “Accuracy in detecting deception: Intimate and friendship relationships”. In Communication Yearbook, Edited by: Burgoon, M. Vol. 6, 446–472. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Библиографическая ссылка DePaulo, B. M., Lanier, K. and Davis, T. 1983. Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45: 1096–1103.
Библиографическая ссылка Duck, S. W. and Pond, K. 1989. “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your retrospective data: Rhetoric and reality in personal relationships”. In Review of Social psychology and personality Vol. 10: Close relationships, Edited by: Hendrick, C. Vol. 10, 3–27. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Библиографическая ссылка Duck, S., Rutt, D. J., Hurst, M. H. and Strejc, H. 1990. Some evident truths about conversation in everyday relationships: All communications are not created equal. Human Communication Research, 18: 228–267.
Библиографическая ссылка Faludi, S. 1991. Backlash: the undeclared war against american women, New York: Crown Publishers.
Библиографическая ссылка Fishman, P. M. 1983. “Interaction: The work women do”. In Language, gender, and society, Edited by: Thorne, B., Kramarae, C. and Henley, N. 89–101. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
Библиографическая ссылка Frazier, P. A. and Esterly, E. 1990. Correlates of relationship beliefs: Gender, relationship experience and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7: 331–352.
Библиографическая ссылка Geis, F. L. and Moon, T. H. 1981. Machiavellianism and deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41: 766–775.
Библиографическая ссылка Gilligan, C. 1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Levine, T. R. Situational intimacy as a predictor of compliance‐gaining tactic selection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association. San Francisco, CA. May.
Библиографическая ссылка Levine, T. R. and McCornack, S.A. 1991. The dark side of trust: conceptualizing and measuring types of communication suspicion. Communication Quarterly, 39: 325–340.
Библиографическая ссылка McCornack, S. A. and Parks, M. R. 1990. What women know that men don't: Sex differences in determining the truth behind deceptive messages. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7: 107–118.
Библиографическая ссылка McCornack, S. A. and Levine, T. R. 1990. When lies are uncovered: Emotional and relational outcomes of discovered deception. Communication Monographs, 57: 119–138.
Библиографическая ссылка Metts, S. and Chronis, H. An exploratory investigation of relational deception. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association. Chicago. May.
Библиографическая ссылка O'Keefe, B. 1988. The logic of message design: Individual differences in reasoning about communication. Communication. Monographs, 55: 80–103.
Библиографическая ссылка Rubin, Z., Peplau, L. A. and Hill, C. T. 1981. Loving and leaving: Sex differences in romantic attachments. Sex. Roles, 7: 821–835.
Библиографическая ссылка Toris, C. and DePaulo, B. M. 1985. Effects of actual deception and suspiciousness of deception on interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47: 1063–1073.
Библиографическая ссылка West, C. and Zimmerman, D. 1991. “Doing gender”. In The social construction of gender, Edited by: Lorber, J. and Farrell, S. A. 13–37. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Скрыть метаданые