| Автор | Diaz‐Camacho, Carolyn |
| Автор | Foley, Christy L. |
| Автор | Petty, James A. |
| Дата выпуска | 1995 |
| dc.description | SummaryThe purpose of this study was to examine Guamanian second‐graders’ short‐ and long‐term prewriting preferences. Good literature books were used to stimulate writing; thus the study also examined if a child's favourite or longest story would be influenced by the good literature selection, the prewriting strategy or the phase of the study in which the story was written. The children wrote three times weekly. Prewriting strategies, trained classroom instructors and good literature selections were counterbalanced. Likert‐scale preference measures were administered to assess short‐ and long‐term student preferences. In addition, children chose their favourite prewriting strategy and favourite story written at the conclusion of the six‐week study. Teachers’ perceptions of the prewriting strategies used in the study were examined using an evaluation instrument containing open‐ended items. Frequency counts were used to assess when favourite and longest stories were written. Mean scores were calculated to compare students’ ratings of the three prewriting strategies on a short‐ and long‐term basis. Study findings suggest that any good literature selection can stimulate the writing of a favourite student composition; however, one‐half of the 12 literature selections used produced 79 per cent of the students’ favourite stories. The same was true of the students’ longest stories. Both favourite and longest stories were produced each week of the study, and all three prewriting strategies appealed to the students on a short‐ and long‐term basis. The students favoured the drawing strategy, however, when asked at the conclusion of the study to choose one favourite prewriting technique. The drawing and imagery prewriting strategies were the teachers’ favourites; problems were noted with the dialogue strategy. Fluency did increase as the children wrote over a one‐ and one‐half‐month period; three‐fifths of the longest stories were produced during the second three‐week phase of the study. |
| Формат | application.pdf |
| Издатель | Taylor & Francis Group |
| Копирайт | Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC |
| Тема | prewriting strategies |
| Тема | Guam |
| Тема | elementary school |
| Тема | writing process |
| Тема | children's literature |
| Тема | prewriting preferences |
| Название | A comparison of imagery, dialogue and drawing prewriting strategies with second‐grade students in Guam |
| Тип | research-article |
| DOI | 10.1080/0013188950370205 |
| Electronic ISSN | 1469-5847 |
| Print ISSN | 0013-1881 |
| Журнал | Educational Research |
| Том | 37 |
| Первая страница | 177 |
| Последняя страница | 184 |
| Аффилиация | Diaz‐Camacho, Carolyn; Finegayan Elementary School; Western Kentucky University |
| Аффилиация | Foley, Christy L.; Finegayan Elementary School; Western Kentucky University |
| Аффилиация | Petty, James A.; Finegayan Elementary School; Western Kentucky University |
| Выпуск | 2 |
| Библиографическая ссылка | ANDERSON, R. C., HIEBERT, E. H., SCOTT, J. A. and WILKINSON, E. A. G. 1985. Becoming a Nation of Readers, Washington, DC: The National Institute of Education. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | BRITTON, J. 1978. “‘The composing process and the functions of writing.’”. In Research on Composing: Points of Departure, Edited by: COOPER, C. R. and ODELL, L. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | DYSON, A. H. Early Writing as Drawing: The Developmental Gap between Speaking and Writing. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. Montreal, Canada. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | EMIG, J. 1971. The Composing Processes of Twelfth‐graders, NCTE Research Report No. 13 13–28. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | GRAVES, D. H. 1983. Writing: Teachers and Children at Work, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | HOSKISSON, K. and TOMPKINS, G. E. 1987. Language Arts: Content and Teaching Strategies, Columbus: Merrill Publishing Company. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | HUCK, C. S., HEPLER, S. and HICKMAN, J. 1987. Children's Literature in the Elementary School , (4th edn), New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | HULL, G. and BARTHOLOMAE, D. 1986. ‘Teaching writing as learning and process’. Educational Leadership, April: 44–52. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | LAPP, D. and FLOOD, J. 1983. Teaching Reading to Every Child, New York: Macmillan. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | MURRAY, D. 1982. Learning by Teaching, Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | MURRAY, D. 1984. Write to Learn, New York: Holt. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | SULZBY, E., TEALE, W. H. and KAMBERELIS, G. 1989. “‘Emergent writing in the classroom: home and school connections.’”. In Emerging Literacy: Young Children Learn to Read and Write, Edited by: STRICKLAND, D. S. and MORROW, L. M. 63–78. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. |
