Автор |
Jegede, Olugbemiro J. |
Автор |
Walkington, Jackie |
Автор |
Naidu, Som |
Дата выпуска |
1995 |
dc.description |
SummaryThe use of learning objectives in study materials for external students is an instructional design strategy which is generally accepted. However, with the emergence of the constructivist paradigm in learning theory, there is the question as to whether the use of objectives, underpinned by behaviourist theory, is justified. This study was undertaken to investigate the distance education student's disposition towards objectives, with particular reference to the way they used them and to what their perceptions and expectations were. Responses to a questionnaire revealed that objectives were perceived by the majority of the students sampled as useful to their studies, and that objectives, for them, were an integral part of their learning strategy. |
Формат |
application.pdf |
Издатель |
Taylor & Francis Group |
Копирайт |
Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC |
Тема |
objectives |
Тема |
behaviourism |
Тема |
constructivism |
Тема |
distance education |
Тема |
instructional materials |
Название |
An investigation into students’ disposition to the use of objectives in distance learning materials |
Тип |
research-article |
DOI |
10.1080/0013188950370307 |
Electronic ISSN |
1469-5847 |
Print ISSN |
0013-1881 |
Журнал |
Educational Research |
Том |
37 |
Первая страница |
293 |
Последняя страница |
304 |
Аффилиация |
Jegede, Olugbemiro J.; Distance Education Centre, University of Southern Queensland |
Аффилиация |
Walkington, Jackie; Distance Education Centre, University of Southern Queensland |
Аффилиация |
Naidu, Som; Distance Education Centre, University of Southern Queensland |
Выпуск |
3 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
AUSUBEL, D. 1963. The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning, New York: Grune and Straton. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
BEREITER, C. 1990. ‘Aspects of an educational learning theory’. Review of Educational Research, 60: 603–24. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
BLOOM, B. S., ENGELHART, M. D., FURST, E. J., HILL, W. H. and KRATH‐WOHL, D.R. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives‐‐the Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook I, Cognitive Domain, New York: Longman, Green. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
BROWN, A. L., CAMPIONE, J. C. and DAY, J. D. 1981. ‘Learning to learn: on training students to learn from texts’. Educational Researcher, 10: 14–21. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
CANDY, P. C. 1991. Self‐direction for Lifelong Learning, San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey‐Bass. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
CONNANT, J. B. 1947. On Understanding Science, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
DAVIES, J. K. 1971. The Management of Learning, New York: McGraw‐Hill. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
DRIVER, R. 1988. “‘Theory into practice II, a constructivist approach to curriculum development.’”. In Development and Dilemmas in Science Education, Edited by: FENSHAM, P. J. 133–49. London: Falmer Press. Chapter 7, |
Библиографическая ссылка |
GAGNE, R. M. 1965. The Conditions of Learning, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
GLASERSFELD, E. VON. 1987. “‘Learning as constructive activity.’”. In The Construction of Knowledge: Contribution to Conceptual Semantics, Edited by: GLASERSFELD, E. Seaside, CA: Intersystems. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
HOLMBERG, B. 1989. Theory and Practice of Distance Education, London: Routledge. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
JEGEDE, O. J. 1991. “‘Constructivist epistemology and its implications for contemporary research in distance learning.’”. In Research in Distance Education 2, Edited by: EVANS, T. and JULER, P. 21–9. Geelong: Institute of Distance Education, Deakin University. Chapter 4, |
Библиографическая ссылка |
JONASSEN, D. H. 1991. ‘Objectivism versus constructivism: do we need a new philosophical paradigm?’. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3): 5–14. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
KEEGAN, D. J. 1990. Foundations of Distance Education , (2nd edn), London: Croom Helm. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
KELLY, G. A. 1955. The Psychology of Personal Constructs, 2 vols, Chicago: Chicago University Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
KRATCHOWILL, T. R. and BIJOU, S. W. 1987. “‘The impact of behaviourism on educational psychology.’”. In Historical Foundation of Educational Psychology, Edited by: GLOVER, J. A. and RONNING, R. R. 131–54. New York: Plenum Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
MAGER, R. F. 1962. Preparing Instructional Objectives, Belmont, Calif.: Pitman Learning. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
MORGAN, A. 1993. Improving Your Students’ Learning: Reflections on the Experience of Study, London: Kogan Page. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
NEWELL, A. and SIMON, H. 1972. Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
NOVAK, J. D. 1988. ‘Learning science and the science of learning’. Studies in Science Education, 15: 77–101. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
PIAGET, J. 1950. The Psychology of Intelligence, New York: Harcourt Brace. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
REIGELUTH, C. M. 1983. “‘Instructional design: what is it and why is it?’”. In Instructional Design Theories and Models: an Overview of Their Current Status, Edited by: REIGELUTH, C. M. 3–36. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Chapter 1, |
Библиографическая ссылка |
RIEBER, L. P. 1993. “‘A pragmatic view of instructional technology.’”. In The Practice of Construction in Science Education, Edited by: TOBIN, K. 193–212. Washington, DC: AAA Press. Chapter 12, |
Библиографическая ссылка |
SKINNER, B. F. 1958. ‘Teaching machines’. Science, 128: 969–77. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
TENNYSON, R. D. 1992. ‘An educational learning theory for instructional design’. Educational Technology, January: 36–41. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
WALBERG, J. H. and HAERTEL, G. D. 1992. ‘Educational psychology first century’. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1): 6–19. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
WHEATLEY, G. H. Constructivist perspectives on science and mathematics learning. Paper presented at First International Conference on the History and Philosophy of Science in Science Teaching. November6‐10, Tallahassee, Florida, USA. Florida State University. |