Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Preston, Dennis R.
Дата выпуска 1996
dc.description A common approach to language awareness is through the contrast between folk and scientific knowledge, the former usually getting brief attention and being assigned little value. This paper argues that the folk awareness of language may be characterised in several different ways, having to do with a wide variety of linguistic characterisations (e.g. overt ‘availability’, ‘degree of accuracy’, ability to ‘control’ language varieties, and the level of specificity of folk knowledge). Only the second of these has to do directly with the folk versus linguist dichotomy, although cognitive constraints on what non‐linguists ‘usually’ know are important factors. More important, however, at least for speakers of American English, are the constraints imposed by notions of language ‘correctness’. In addition, folk linguistics is shown here to be a dynamic area of study, perhaps best uncovered by the analysis of ongoing discourses about language in speech communities. Finally, the value of folk linguistic awareness for both its scientific merit and its importance to applied concerns is briefly discussed.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Название Whaddayaknow?: The modes of folk linguistic awareness
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/09658416.1996.9959890
Electronic ISSN 1747-7565
Print ISSN 0965-8416
Журнал Language Awareness
Том 5
Первая страница 40
Последняя страница 74
Аффилиация Preston, Dennis R.; Department of Linguistics and Germanic, Slavic. Asian and African Languages, Michigan State University
Выпуск 1
Библиографическая ссылка Abrahams, R. 1969. The complex relation of simple forms. Genre, 2(2): 104–28.
Библиографическая ссылка Bauman, R. 1975. Verbal art as performance. American Anthropologist, 77: 290–311.
Библиографическая ссылка Basso, K.H. 1979. Portraits of ‘The Whiteman’, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Ben‐Amos, D. 1972. “Toward a definition of folklore in context”. In Toward New Perspectives in Folklore, Edited by: Paredes, A. and Bauman, R. 3–15. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Bloomfield, L. 1944. Secondary and tertiary responses to language. Language, 20: 45–55.
Библиографическая ссылка Brown, P. and Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use, New York: Praeger.
Библиографическая ссылка Coupland, N. Language, situation and the relational self: Theorising dialect‐style in sociolinguistics. Paper presented at NSF‐sponsored symposium on style. Stanford. February. Stanford University Linguistics Department.
Библиографическая ссылка Ellis, R. 1989. Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(3): 305–28.
Библиографическая ссылка Feagin, C. The southern drawl: An acoustic and sociolinguistic analysis. Paper presented at the John F. Kennedy Institute of North American Studies. Berlin: Free University.
Библиографическая ссылка Gleitman, L.R. and Gleitman, H. 1970. Phrase and Paraphrase, New York: Norton.
Библиографическая ссылка Hoenigswald, H. 1966. “A proposal for the study of folk‐linguistics”. In Sociolinguistics, Edited by: Bright, William. 16–26. The Hague: Mouton.
Библиографическая ссылка Hymes, D. 1972. “The contribution of folklore to sociolinguistic research”. In Toward New Perspectives in Folklore, Edited by: Paredes, A. and Bauman, R. 42–50. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Irvine, J.T. ‘Style’ as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. Paper presented at NSF‐sponsored symposium on style. Stanford. February. Stanford University Linguistics Department.
Библиографическая ссылка Krapp, G.P. 1926. The psychology of dialect writing. The Bookman, 63: 522–7.
Библиографическая ссылка Krashen, S.D. 1988. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning, New York: Prentice Hall.
Библиографическая ссылка Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 1975. What is a Linguistic Fact, Lisse: Peter de Ridder.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. The unobservability of structure and its linguistic consequences. Paper presented at NWAV 22. October. University of Ottawa.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors, Oxford: Blackwell.
Библиографическая ссылка Laferriere, M. 1979. Ethnicity in phonological variation and change. Language, 55(3): 603–17.
Библиографическая ссылка Mellon, J. 1969. Transformational Sentence‐combining, Urbana, IL: NCTE.
Библиографическая ссылка Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. 1985. Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescription and Standardisation , 2nd edn, London: Routledge.
Библиографическая ссылка Montgomery, M. 1992. “The etymology of y'all”. In English Old and New: Studies in Language and Linguistics in Honor of Frederic G. Cassidy, Edited by: Hall, J.H., Doane, N. and Ringler, R. 356–69. New York: Garland.
Библиографическая ссылка Newmeyer, F.J. 1983. Grammatical Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Niedzielski, N. and Preston, D. Folk Linguistics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (submitted)
Библиографическая ссылка Preston, D. 1975. Linguists versus non‐linguists and native speakers versus non‐native speakers: A study in linguistic acceptability. Biuletyn Fonograficzny, 26: 5–18.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 1989a. Perceptual Dialectology, Dordrecht: Foris.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 1989b. “Folk speech”. In Encyclopedia of Southern Culture, Edited by: Wilson, C.R. and Ferris, W. 768–9. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 1989c. “Standard English spoken here: The geographical loci of linguistic norms”. In Status and Function of Languages and Language Varieties, Edited by: Ammon, U. 324–54. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 1993a. “Talking Black and talking White”. In English Old and New: Studies in Language and Linguistics in Honor of Frederic G. Cassidy, Edited by: Hall, J.H., Doane, N. and Ringler, R. 327–55. New York: Garland.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 1993b. The uses of folk linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2): 181–259.
Библиографическая ссылка _____. 1993c. “Folk dialectology”. In American Dialed Research, Edited by: Preston, D. 333–77. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Библиографическая ссылка Schenkein, J., ed. 1978. Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, New York: Academic.
Библиографическая ссылка Silverstein, M. 1981. The limits of awareness, Sociolinguistic Working Paper No. 84 Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Библиографическая ссылка Spencer, N. 1973. Differences between linguists and non‐linguists in intuitions of grammaticality‐acceptability. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2: 83–98.
Библиографическая ссылка Trudgill, P. 1983. “Acts of conflicting identity (Chapter 8)”. In On Dialect, Edited by: Trudgill, P. 141–60. New York: New York University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Wolfram, W. 1991. Dialects and American English, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.
Библиографическая ссылка Wolfram, W. and Schilling‐Estes, N. 1995. Moribund dialects and the endangerment canon: The case of the Ocracoke Brogue. Language, 71(4): 696–721.

Скрыть метаданые