Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Evans, Gillian R.
Дата выпуска 1978
dc.description SummaryMunich, Bayerische Staadtsbibliothek Ms. C.L.M. 4643 contains a curious commentary on Boethius's Arithmetica, which deals very fully with some passages in the work and totally neglects a great many others. The principal interest of the piece lies in the fact that the parts of the Arithmetica it selects for consideration are exactly those which were of special interest to twelfth- and early-thirteenth-century students, and in particular to the successors of Hugh of St. Victor who continued to draw on the Victorine tradition.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Название A commentary on Boethius's Arithmetica of the twelfth or thirteenth century
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/00033797800200181
Electronic ISSN 1464-505X
Print ISSN 0003-3790
Журнал Annals of Science
Том 35
Первая страница 131
Последняя страница 141
Аффилиация Evans, Gillian R.; Department of History, The University of Reading
Выпуск 2
Библиографическая ссылка Smalley. 1952. The study of the Bible in the Middle Ages 46–66. Oxford
Библиографическая ссылка Thorndike. 1963. A catalogue of incipits of mediaeval scientific writings in Latin New York and London col. 1522 notes several manuscripts of this work.
Библиографическая ссылка Baron, R., ed. 1966. Hugh of St. Victor: opera propaeudeutica Notre Dame The texts included are the Practica geometriae, the De grammatica and the Epitome dindimi in philosophiam.
Библиографическая ссылка PL, 176173–174.
Библиографическая ссылка Friedlein. 1867. Arithmetica 3–3. Leipzig lines 5–6. M, f. 100<sup>v</sup>: ‘Propter quod et prologum premittit commendativum in quo captat benevolentiam illius cui scribit affirmans se nichil invenisse quod vel a se potius mittendum esse daret, vel ab illo gracius suscipiendum putaret, inde consequenter probat munus suum laudabile, et acceptione dignum’.
Библиографическая ссылка Friedlein. 1867. Arithmetica 8–8. Leipzig lines 1–15. M, f. 102: ‘et nota quod omnia praedicamenta in intellectu ponit, potest solum praedicamentum substantie. Qualitas enim et quantitas et cetera omnia nomina tantum sunt illorum rerum quae in intellectu sunt’.
Библиографическая ссылка PL, 64875–892. Compare the De diffinitione of Victorinus, also in PL 64, 891–910, under Boethius's name.
Библиографическая ссылка Friedlein. 1867. Arithmetica 13–13. Leipzig lines 13–14; the even is that which can be divided into two parts with no remainder.
Библиографическая ссылка Friedlein. 1867. Arithmetica 13–13. Leipzig lines 20–21; d'Ooge (footnote 6), 190–191, has a helpful note on this. M, f. 102<sup>v</sup>–103.
Библиографическая ссылка Friedlein. 1867. Arithmetica 45–45. Leipzig line 11. M, f. 103: ‘Videtur contra propositam materie sue de relatione tractare, cum arithmetice primum sit considerare multitudinem per se’.
Библиографическая ссылка Friedlein. 1867. Arithmetica 53–53. Leipzig Compare d'Ooge (footnote 6), p. 217 ff.; and M, f. 103.
Библиографическая ссылка 1966. Practica geometriae 16–16. Notre Dame
Библиографическая ссылка Friedlein. 1867. Arithmetica 66ff–66ff. Leipzig and see footnote 6. M, f. 103<sup>v</sup>: ‘hoc locum Gerbertus exponit, unde a quibusdam ‘saltus Gerberti’ vocatur … dicit sesquiquartos ad sesquitercios redire numerum, quod est, sed tamen non sicut vero quadrupli ad triplos, sesquiquarti enim primum ad quadruplos redeunt, deinde quadrupli ad triplos. Post hoc de triplis nascuntur sesquitertii. Rursumque … etc, … ac postremo dupli ad equalitatem revertuntur’.
Библиографическая ссылка Friedlein. 1867. Arithmetica 86–86. Leipzig line 24. M, f. 104<sup>v</sup>: ‘signa numerorum vocat litteras quae in designatione numerorum ponuntur, ut v, x, l, c, d, quae natura non formavit, sed usus affinxit, id est quae solo placito institute sunt’.
Библиографическая ссылка Friedlein. 1867. Arithmetica 87–87. Leipzig lines 17–18. M, f. 104<sup>v</sup>: ‘“Neque enim punctum superpositum puncto ullum efficit intervallum” probat quod punctum nullum habet intervallum, quia non efficit intervallum. Quod tamen quantum ad comparationem intelligendum non quantum ad compositionem. Inter nichil enim et aliquid comparacio non est, sive inter nichil et nichil … Sic punctum superpositum puncto … non efficit intervallum, id est distancia dimensionis’.
Библиографическая ссылка Friedlein. 1867. Arithmetica 126–126. Leipzig and see De eodem et diverso (ed. H. Willner: Munster, 1903). M, f. 105<sup>v</sup>: ‘sicut de eodem et diversa omnia constant’.

Скрыть метаданые