Автор |
Johnson, Fred |
Дата выпуска |
1995 |
dc.description |
One semantic and two syntactic decision procedures are given for determining the validity of Aristotelian assertoric and apodeictic syllogisms.Results are obtained by using the Aristotelian deductions that necessarily have an even number of premises |
Формат |
application.pdf |
Издатель |
Taylor & Francis |
Копирайт |
Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC |
Название |
Apodeictic syllogisms: Deductions and decision procedures |
Тип |
research-article |
DOI |
10.1080/01445349508837237 |
Electronic ISSN |
1464-5149 |
Print ISSN |
0144-5340 |
Журнал |
History and Philosophy of Logic |
Том |
16 |
Первая страница |
1 |
Последняя страница |
18 |
Аффилиация |
Johnson, Fred; Department of Philosophy, Colorado State University |
Выпуск |
1 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Johnson, F. 1989. Models for modal syllogisms. Notre Dame journal of formal logic, 30: 271–284. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Johnson, F. 1991. Three-membered domains for Aristotle’s syllogistic. Studia logica, 50: 181–187. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Johnson, F. 1993. Modal ecthesis. History and philosophy of logic, 14: 171–182. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
McCall, S. 1963. Aristotle’s modal syllogisms, Amsterdam: North-Holland. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Ross, W.D. 1949. Aristotle’s prior and posterior analytics, Oxford: Clarendon Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Smiley, T.J. 1973. What is a syllogism?. Journal of philosophical logic, 2: 136–154. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Smith, R. 1989. Aristotle: prior analytics, Indianapolis: Hackett. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Thom, P. 1991. The two Barbaras. History and philosophy of logic, 12: 135–149. |