Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Bäck, Allan
Дата выпуска 1995
dc.description In his Parts of Animals, Aristotle distinguishes three modes of the necessary.However, it is not clear just what these three modes are.Nor is it clear how this passage fits with other texts where Aristotle distinguishes modalities in different ways.Here I present and explain Aristotle’s three modes of necessity, and claim that they are the only three recognized by Aristotle.I then explain how this passage agrees with other passages where Aristotle mentions formal and structural features of the modalities.I end by showing how having three modes of necessity does not make ‘necessary’ ambiguous.Rather, I claim, Aristotle has a single, central notion of necessity and hence a unified theory of modality
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Название Aristotelian necessities
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/01445349508837242
Electronic ISSN 1464-5149
Print ISSN 0144-5340
Журнал History and Philosophy of Logic
Том 16
Первая страница 89
Последняя страница 106
Аффилиация Bäck, Allan; Department of Philosophy, Kutztown University
Выпуск 1
Библиографическая ссылка Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works, Edited by: Barnes, J. Vol. 2, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Avicenna. 1973. Al-Oīyās, Edited by: Madkhour, I. Cairo: Government Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Bäck, Allan. 1992a. Avicenna’s Conception of the Modalities. Vivarium, 30(2): 217–255.
Библиографическая ссылка Bäck, Allan. 1992b. Sailing Through the Sea Battle. Ancient Philosophy, 12(2): 133–151.
Библиографическая ссылка Balme, David. 1972. Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalibus I and De Generatione Animalium, Vol. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Balme, David. 1987. “Teleology and Necessity”. In Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Edited by: Gotthelf, A and Lennox, J. 275–285. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Charles, David. 1988. Aristotle on Hypothetical Necessity and Irreducibility. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 69: 1–53.
Библиографическая ссылка Cooper, John. 1987. Hypothetical Necessity and Natural Teleology. Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, 69: 243–274.
Библиографическая ссылка Freeland, Cynthia. 1986. Aristotle on Possibilities and Capacities. Ancient Philosophy, 6: 69–90.
Библиографическая ссылка Gotthelf, Allan. 1985. “Notes Towards a Study of Substance and Essence in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals II–IV”. In Aristotle on Nature and Living Things, Edited by: Gotthelf, A. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Hempel, Carl. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York: The Free Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Hintikka, Jaakko. 1973. Time and Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Lloyd, A.C. 1981. “Necessity and Essence in the Posterior Analytics”. In Aristotle on Science, Edited by: Berti, E. Padua.
Библиографическая ссылка Mignucci, Mario. 1981. “Hōs Epi to Polu et Nécessaire”. In Aristotle on Science, Edited by: Berti, E. Padua.
Библиографическая ссылка Owen, G.E.L. 1986. “Aristotle and the Snares of Ontology”. In Logic, Science, and Dialectic, Edited by: Nussbaum, M. 259–78. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Smith, Robin. 1989. Aristotle: Prior Analytics, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Библиографическая ссылка Sorabji, Richard. 1969. Aristotle and Oxford Philosophy. American Philosophical Quarterly, 62: 127–135.
Библиографическая ссылка Sorabji, Richard. 1980. Necessity, Cause, and Blame, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Turnball, Robert. 1985. “Zeno’s Stricture and Prediation”. In How Things Are, Edited by: Bogen, J and McGuire, J. 21–58. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Библиографическая ссылка Waterlow [Broadie], Sarah. 1982a. Nature, Change, and Agency, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Waterlow [Broadie], Sarah. 1982b. Passage and Possibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Скрыть метаданые