Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Bowman, Margie
Дата выпуска 1981
dc.description AbstractMany issues about the process of reading and remembering have arisen from recent research which focuses on various aspects of schema theory. This paper discusses Anderson, Pichert and Shirey's (1979) contention that content schemata is more important to the reader than textual schemata. After presenting a background of the development of schema theory, this paper examines research which supports either content schemata or textual schemata as the more facilitating set for reading and recalling discourse. The conclusion drawn is that the more useful schemata is determined by the context (reader‐material match), rather than one schemata set always being more important than the other.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Название A comparison of content schemata and textual schemata or the process of parachuting
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/19388078109557615
Print ISSN 0149-0117
Журнал Reading World
Том 21
Первая страница 14
Последняя страница 22
Аффилиация Bowman, Margie; Director of the Early Childhood ‐Elementary Education Program, Hood College
Выпуск 1
Библиографическая ссылка Anderson, R. and Pichert, J. 1978. Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17: 1–12.
Библиографическая ссылка Anderson, R., Pichert, J. and Shirey, L. April 1979. Effects of the reader's schemata at different points in time, Tech. Rep. No. 119 April, Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
Библиографическая ссылка Ausubel, D. 1963. The psychology of meaningful verbal learning: An introduction to school learning, New York: Grune & Stratton.
Библиографическая ссылка Bartlett, F. 1932. Remembering, Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Mandler, J. and Johnson, N. 1977. Rememberance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9: 111–151.
Библиографическая ссылка Owens, J., Bower, G. and Black, J. 1972. The “soap‐opera” effect in story recall. Memory and Cognition, 7: 185–191.
Библиографическая ссылка Pichert, J. and Anderson, R. 1977. Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69: 309–315.
Библиографическая ссылка Royer, J. 1977. “Remembering: Constructive or reconstructive? Comments on chapter 5 by Spiro”. In Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge, Edited by: Anderson, R., Spiro, R. and Montague, W. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Библиографическая ссылка Rumelhart, D. 1977. “Notes on a schema for stories”. In Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science, Edited by: Bobrow, D. and Collins, A. New York: Academic Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Stein, N. and Nezworski, T. 1978. The effects of organization and instructional set on story memory. Discourse Processes, 1: 177–193.
Библиографическая ссылка Sulin, R. and Dooling, J. 1974. Intrusion of a thematic idea in retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103: 255–262.
Библиографическая ссылка Thomdyke, P. 1977. Cognitive structure in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9: 77–110.

Скрыть метаданые