Автор |
Ouchi, Kazuomi |
Дата выпуска |
1978 |
dc.description |
AbstractAfter a series of setbacks due to the unilateral legislative actions of some coastal powers, Japan has made some major policy changes toward the new regimes of the sea—much against what it has preached, but out of necessity. Those changes relate to the territorial sea, international straits, and a 200‐mi exclusive fishery zone; each change poses problems peculiar to Japan. I will review the apparently antiquated traditionalist approach toward the new ocean regimes to which Japan adhered so tenaciously. The long‐range policy of Japan, I believe, should be geared to preservation of its traditional resources rights rather than maintenance of the tra ditional regimes on the oceans. Japan's traditional rights may survive even within the framework of the Revised Single Negotiating Text through vigorous and successful bilateral negotiations. On the other hand, a wide exclusive economic zone may prove to be beneficial to Japan, particularly when mineral resources are considered, depending, of course, upon the criteria applied to the delimitation of the exclusive zone. In a proper perspective Japan, too, will find itself a beneficiary of the new law of the sea. |
Формат |
application.pdf |
Издатель |
Taylor & Francis Group |
Копирайт |
Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC |
Название |
A perspective on Japan's struggle for its traditional rights on the oceans |
Тип |
research-article |
DOI |
10.1080/00908327809545608 |
Electronic ISSN |
1521-0642 |
Print ISSN |
0090-8320 |
Журнал |
Ocean Development & International Law |
Том |
5 |
Первая страница |
107 |
Последняя страница |
134 |
Аффилиация |
Ouchi, Kazuomi; Professor of Law, Seinan Gakuin University |
Выпуск |
1 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
1976. Asahi, November 28 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
1976. Asahi, November 28 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Takeda, Cf. 1976. The Coordination Among the Governmental Agencies in the Decision‐making Process of Japan's Foreign Policies. Kokusai‐Mondai (International Affairs], 201: 16 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
1967. Collection of the Statements of the Japanese Representatives to the Third Law of the Sea Conference. November1967. pp.74 January 1974 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Official Records. Summary Records at 41st Meeting. vol. I, pp.181 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
1976. Asahi, November 15 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Collection of the Statements, 190–191. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. Official Records, l181 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Third United National Conference on the Law of the Sea. Official Records. Vol. 2, pp.217–218. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
1975. Third United Nations Law of the Sea Conference Major Unresolved Issues. Journal of International Law, 14: 112 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Alexander, Lewis M. and Hodgson, Robert D. The Impact of the 200‐mile Economic Zone on the Law of the Sea, 507 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
1976. Asahi, November 9 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, Official Records. Summary Records of Meetings. Vol. 2, pp.147 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Collection of the Statements, 7158–159. ibid |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, Offical Records, 2(47)147 ibid |
Библиографическая ссылка |
1969. International Court of Justice. ICJ Reports, : 53 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, Official Records, 47148 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Park. “The Sino-Japanese-Korean Sea Resources Controversy and the Hypothesis of a 200-mile Economic Zone,”. Harvard International Law Journal, 162729 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Collection of the Statements, 7160 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
1976. Asahi, November 28 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
1976. Asahi, October 26 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
1976. Ibid, December 26 |