Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Levin, Joel R.
Автор Johnson, Dale D.
Автор Pittelman, Susan D.
Автор Levin, Kathy M.
Автор Shriberg, Linda K.
Автор Toms‐Bronowski, Susan
Автор Hayes, Bernard L.
Дата выпуска 1984
dc.description Fourth‐ and fifth‐grade students were taught the meanings of new vocabulary items according to one of three instructional strategies. Two of the strategies were semantic‐based (contextual analysis and semantic mapping), and the other strategy was mnemonic‐based (the keyword method). Consistent with recent research findings, the keyword method facilitated students’ recall of the vocabulary items’ definitions, and this was true in both higher‐ and lower‐achieving subject populations. In the higher‐achieving sample, the keyword method was also superior to the contextual analysis strategy on two vocabulary‐usage tests, one that was administered on the day immediately following instruction and one that was administered a week later. Mean performance on a one‐week delayed definition‐matching test was statistically equivalent in the three conditions, although in the higher‐achieving sample a reliably higher proportion of keyword subjects than contextual analysis subjects attained perfect scores on that test. No significant difference between the two semantic‐ based strategies was found on any of the dependent measures. Implications of the results and suggestions for future research are included in the discussion.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Taylor & Francis Group
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Название A COMPARISON OF SEMANTIC‐ AND MNEMONIC‐BASED VOCABULARY‐LEARNING STRATEGIES
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/0270271840050102
Electronic ISSN 1521-0685
Print ISSN 0270-2711
Журнал Reading Psychology
Том 5
Первая страница 1
Последняя страница 15
Аффилиация Levin, Joel R.; University of Wisconsin
Аффилиация Johnson, Dale D.; University of Wisconsin
Аффилиация Pittelman, Susan D.; University of Wisconsin
Аффилиация Levin, Kathy M.; University of Wisconsin
Аффилиация Shriberg, Linda K.; University of Wisconsin
Аффилиация Toms‐Bronowski, Susan; University of Wisconsin
Аффилиация Hayes, Bernard L.; Utah State University
Выпуск 1-2
Библиографическая ссылка Atkinson, R. C. 1975. Mnemotechnics in second‐language learning. American Psychologist, 30: 821–828.
Библиографическая ссылка Dale, E. and O'Rourke, J. 1976. The living word vocabulary, Elgin, Ill.: Field Enterprises Educational Corporation.
Библиографическая ссылка Gipe, J. 1979. Investigating techniques for teaching word meanings. Reading Research Quarterly, 14: 624–644.
Библиографическая ссылка Johnson, D. D. and Pearson, P. D. 1978. Teaching reading vocabulary, New York: Holt & Co..
Библиографическая ссылка Johnson, D. D., Toms‐Bronowski, S. and Pittelman, S. D. 1982. Vocabulary development. Volta Review, 84(5): 11–24.
Библиографическая ссылка Kirk, R. E. 1982. Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences , (2nd ed.), Belmont Calif.: Brooks/Cole.
Библиографическая ссылка Levin, J. R. 1982. “Pictures as prose‐learning devices”. In Discourse processing, Edited by: Flammer, A. and Kintsch, W. Amsterdam: North‐Holland.
Библиографическая ссылка Levin, J. R. 1983. “Pictorial strategies for school learning: Practical illustrations”. In Cognitive strategy research: Educational applications, Edited by: Pressley, M. and Levin, J. R. New York: Springer‐Verlag.
Библиографическая ссылка Levin, J. R., McCormick, C. B., Miller, G. E., Berry, J. K. and Pressley, M. 1982. Mnemonic versus nonmnemonic vocabularylearning strategies for children. American Educational Research Journal, 19: 121–136.
Библиографическая ссылка Levin, J. R. and Pressley, M. “Mnemonic vocabulary instruction: What's fact, what's fiction”. In Individual differences in cognition, Edited by: Dillon, R. F. and Schmeck, R. R. Vol. 2, New York: Academic Press. in press
Библиографическая ссылка Levin, J. R., Pressley, M., McCormick, C. B., Miller, G. E. and Shriberg, L. K. 1979. Assessing the classroom potential of the keyword method. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71: 583–594.
Библиографическая ссылка Margosein, C. M., Pascarella, E. T. and Pflaum, S. W. 1982. The effects of instruction using semantic mapping on vocabulary and comprehension. Journal of Early Adolescence, 2: 185–194.
Библиографическая ссылка Pany, D. and Jenkins, J. R. 1978. Learning word meanings: A comparison of instructional procedures. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1: 21–32.
Библиографическая ссылка Pressley, M., Levin, J. R. and Delaney, H. D. 1982. The mnemonic keyword method. Review of Educational Research, 52: 61–91.
Библиографическая ссылка Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., Kuiper, N. A., Bryant, S. L. and Michener, S. 1982. Mnemonic versus nonmnemonic vocabularylearning strategies: Additional comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74: 693–707.
Библиографическая ссылка Pressley, M., Levin, J. R. and Miller, G. E. 1981. How does the keyword method affect vocabulary comprehension and usage?. Reading Research Quarterly, 16: 213–226.
Библиографическая ссылка Sternberg, R. J., Powell, J. S. and Kaye, D. B. 1983. “Teaching vocabulary‐building skills: A contextual approach”. In Classroom computers and cognitive science, Edited by: Wilkinson, A. C. New York: Academic Press.

Скрыть метаданые