Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Bonesrønning, Hans
Дата выпуска 1996
dc.description Most upper secondary schools in Norway are so-called sombined schools, where vocational and general departments exist side. This paper investigates whether school characteristics—the number if departments and the size of the academic department—affect the performance of academic stuents. It is shown that student achievement deteriorates when the number of departments increases and that there is an optimal department size dependent on the initial level of knowledge of the average students. The paper takes account of the teachers may be non-randomly distributed among the schools.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Carfax Publishing Company
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Название School Characterisitcs and Student Achievement: Evidence from Combined Upper Secondary Schools in Norway
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/09645299600000014
Electronic ISSN 1469-5782
Print ISSN 0964-5292
Журнал Education Economics
Том 4
Первая страница 143
Последняя страница 160
Аффилиация Bonesrønning, Hans; Department of Economics, University of Trondheim
Выпуск 2
Библиографическая ссылка Bidwell, C. E. and Kasarda, J. D. 1975. School district organisation and student achievement. American Sociological Review, 40: 50–77.
Библиографическая ссылка Bonesrønning, H. 1995. Student body composition and student performance. Education Economics, 4: 11–31.
Библиографическая ссылка Bonesrønning, H. and Rattsø, J. 1994. Efficiency variation among Norwegian high schools: consequences of equalization policy. Economics of Education Review, 13: 289–304.
Библиографическая ссылка Bradford, D. F., Malt, R. A. and Oates, W. E. 1969. The rising cost of local public service:some evidence and reflections. National Tax Journal, 22: 185–202.
Библиографическая ссылка Brookover, W. B., Beady, C., Flook, P., Schweitzer, J. and wisenbaker, J. School Social Systems and Student Achievement: School Can Make a Difference, New York: Praeger.
Библиографическая ссылка Brown, B. and Saks, D. 1980. “Production technologies and resources allocation within classrooms and schools”. In The Analysis of Educational Productivity, Edited by: Dreeben, R. and Thomas, J. A. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Библиографическая ссылка Bryk, A. S., Lee, V. E. and Smith, J. B. 1990. “High school organization and its effects on teachers and students: an interpretive summary of the research”. In Choice and Control in American Education, Edited by: Clune, W. H. and Witte, J. F. Vol. 1, New York: Falmer.
Библиографическая ссылка Butler, R. J. and Monk, D. H. 1985. The cost of public schooling in New York State: the role of scale and efficiency in 1978–79. The Journal of Human Resources, 20: 361–380.
Библиографическая ссылка Calvo, G. and Wellisz, S. 1978. Supervision, loss of control and the optimal size of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 86: 943–952.
Библиографическая ссылка Chubb, J. and Moe, T. 1990. Politics, Markets and America's Schools, Washington, DC: Brookings.
Библиографическая ссылка Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T. and Kilgore, S. 1982. High School Achievement: Public, Catholic and Private Schools Compared, New York: Basic Books.
Библиографическая ссылка Correa, H. and Gruver, G. W. 1987. Teacher-student interaction: a game theoretic extension of the economic theory of education. Mathematical Social Science, 13: 19–47.
Библиографическая ссылка Ehrenberg, R. G. and Brewer, D. J. 1994. Do school and teacher characterstics matter? Evidence from high school and beyond. Economics of Education Review, 13
Библиографическая ссылка Evans, W. N., Oates, W. E. and Schwab, R. M. 1992. Measuring peer group effects: a study of teenage behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 100
Библиографическая ссылка Friedkin, N. E. and Necochea, J. 1988. School system size and performance: a contingency perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10
Библиографическая ссылка Holmstrom, B. R. and Tirole, J. 1989. “The theory of the firm”. In Handbook of Industrial Organization, Edited by: Schmalense, R. and Willig, R. Vol. 1, Elsevier.
Библиографическая ссылка Kelley, A. C. 1975. The student as a utility maximizer. Journal of Economic Education, : 82–92.
Библиографическая ссылка Lee, V. E. and Bryk, A. S. 1989. A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62: 172–192.
Библиографическая ссылка McKenzie, R. B. 1972. The economics of reduced faculty loads. Journal of Political Economy, 80: 617–619.
Библиографическая ссылка McKenzie, R. B. 1979. “The political economy of the educational process”. In Public Choice, Vol. 2, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
Библиографическая ссылка Monk, D. H. 1992. Education productivity research: an update and assessment of its role in education finance reform. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14: 307–332.
Библиографическая ссылка Monk, D. H. 1994. Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13
Библиографическая ссылка Murnane, R. J., Newstead, S. and Olsen, R. J. 1985. Comparing public and private schools: the puzzling role of selectivity bias. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 3
Библиографическая ссылка Powell, A., Farrar, E. and Cohen, D. 1985. The Shopping Mall High School, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Библиографическая ссылка Summers, A. and Wolfe, B. 1977. Do schools make a difference?. American Economic Review, 67: 639–652.

Скрыть метаданые