| Автор | Lahr, Michael L. |
| Дата выпуска | 1993 |
| dc.description | Fueled by the high costs of survey-based models and the inherent inaccuracies of non-survey models, a literature has emerged on hybrid regional input–output models. Although this literature has been instructive on the general approach that should be taken in the construction of such models, authors have provided little information about the precise methods they have used to idenfy. the portions of the models for which superior data are worth the effort to obtain. In addition, the role of non-survey techniques used to produce survey-based tables has not been well articulated in the literature. This paper reviews approaches that have been used in input—output analysis that might be adopted for use in constructing hybrid input–output models. It is argued that hybrid model constructors should pursue the most accurate non-survey model of their region as possible (use accurate regional purchase coefficients and minimize aggregation), always seek superior data for households and establishments in resource-based and ‘miscellaneous’ sectors, and sequentially identify. other sectors that should receive superior data. This last task should be performed by examining the sensitivity of sectors to changes in the proportion of their inputs that are imported. Other than intermediate inputs and outputs, labor income and intrasectoral shipments for any specified sector, it is suggested that, for each targeted sector, modelers seek superior data only for a limited number of cells associated with the sector in the direct-coefficients matrix. These cells should be those that are critical to the overall accuracy of the Leontief inverse. Finally, it is suggested that a procedure ought to be used to reconcile the various data sources that will inevitably be employed. |
| Формат | application.pdf |
| Издатель | Carfax Publishing Company |
| Копирайт | Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC |
| Название | A Review of the Literature Supporting the Hybrid Approach to Constructing Regional Input–Output Models |
| Тип | research-article |
| DOI | 10.1080/09535319300000023 |
| Electronic ISSN | 1469-5758 |
| Print ISSN | 0953-5314 |
| Журнал | Economic Systems Research |
| Том | 5 |
| Первая страница | 277 |
| Последняя страница | 293 |
| Аффилиация | Lahr, Michael L.; Regional Financial Associates |
| Выпуск | 3 |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Afrasiabi, A. and Casler, S. D. 1991. Product mix and technological change within the Leontief inverse. Journal of Regional Science, 31: 147–160. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Ashcroft, B. and Swales, J. K. 1982. The importance of the first round in the multiplier process: the impact of Civil Service dispersal. Environment and Planning A, 14: 429–444. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Augustinvics, M. A. 1970. “Methods of international and intertemporal comparison of suucture”. In Contributions to Input–Output Analysis, Edited by: Carter, A.P. and Brody, A. Vol. 1, 249–269. Amsterdam: North-Holland. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Beemiller, R. M. 1990. Improving accuracy by combining primary data with RIMS: comment on Bourque. International Regional Science Review, 13: 99–101. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Beyers, W. B. 1976. Empirical identification of key sectors: some further evidence. Environment and Planning A, 17: 73–99. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Boomsma, P. and Oosterhaven, J. 1992. A double entry method for the construction of biregional input–output tables. Journal of Regional Science, 32: 269–284. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Bourque, P. J. 1971. Discussion of Walderhaug's paper ‘State input–output tables derived from national data’. Proceedings of the Business and Economics Section of the American Statistical Association, : 99–100. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Brucker, S. M., Hastings, S. E. and Latham, W. R. III. 1987. Regional input–output analysis: a comparison of five ‘ready made’ model systems. Review of Regional Studies, 17: 1–16. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Brucker, S. M., Hastings, S. E. and Latham, W. R. III. 1990. The variation of estimated impacts from five regional input–output models. International Regional Science Review, 13: 119–139. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Cella, G. 1984. The input–output measurement of interindustry linkages. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 46: 73–84. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Chakraborty, D. and ten Raa, T. 1981. The aggregation problem in input–output analysis—a survey. Artha Vijnana, 23: 326–344. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Chenery, H. B. and Watanabe, T. 1958. International comparisons of the structure of production. Econometrica, 4: 487–521. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Chipman, J. S. 1976. “Estimation and aggregation in economics”. In Generalized Inverses and Applications, Edited by: Nashed, M. Z. New York: Academic Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Clements, B. J. 1990. On the decomposition and normalization of interindustry linkages. Economic Letters, 33: 337–340. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Conway, R. S. Jr. 1980. Changes in regional input–output coefficients and regional forecasting. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 10: 153–171. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Doeksen, G. and Little, C. 1968. Effect of size of input–output model on the results of an impact analysis. Agricultural Economic Research, 20: 134–138. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Evans, W. D. 1954. The effect of structural matrix errors on interindustry relations estimates. Econometrica, 22: 461–480. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Garhart, R. E. 1985. The role of error structure in simulations on regional input–output analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 25: 353–366. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Garhart, R. E. and Giarratani, F. 1987a. Nonsurvey input–output estimation techniques: evidence on the structure of errors. Journal of Regional Science, 27: 245–253. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Garhart, R. E. and Giarratani, F. Nonsurvey input–output estimation methods: the importance of the household sector. Presented at the 34th North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association. 8 November, Baltimore. Mimeographed |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Gerking, S. D. 1976a. Estimation of Stochastic Input–Output Models: Some Statistical Problems, Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Gerking, S. D. 1976b. Input–Output as a simple econometric model. Review of Economics and Statistics, 58: 274–282. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Gerking, S. D. 1979. Reconciling reconciliation procedures in regional input–output analysis. International Regional Science Review, 4: 23–36. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Gerking, S. D. and Pleeter, S. 1977. Minimum variance sampling in input–output analysis. Review of Regional Studies, 7: 59–80. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Ghosh, A. 1958. Input–output approach in an allocative system. Economica, 25: 58–64. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Gosfield, A. 1955. “Input–output analysis of the Puerto Rican economy”. In Input–Output Analysis: An Appraisal, 321–366. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Greenstreet, D. 1989. A conceptual framework for construction of hybrid regional input–output models. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 23: 283–289. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Hansen, W. L. and Tiebout, C. M. 1963. An intersectoral flows analysis of the California economy. Review of Economics and Statistics, 45: 409–418. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Harrigan, F. J. and McGilvray, J. 1988. The measurement of interindustry linkages. Richerche Economiche, 42: 325–343. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Hazari, B. R. 1970. Empirical identification of key sectors in the Indian economy. Review of Economics and Statistics, 52: 301–305. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Henry, M. S., Leholm, A., Schaible, G. and Haskins, J. 1980. A semi-survey approach to building regional input–output models: an application to Western North Dakota. North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2: 17–24. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Hewings, G. J. D. 1972. Input–output models: aggregation for regional impact analysis. Growth and Change, 3: 15–19. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Hewings, G. J. D. 1977. Evaluating the possibilities for exchanging regional input–output coefficients. Environment and Planning A, 9: 927–944. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Hewings, G. J. D. and Romanos, M. C. 1981. Simulating less-developed regional economies under conditions of limited information. Geographical Analysis, 13: 373–390. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Hirsch, W. Z. 1959. An application of area input–output analysis. Papers, Regional Science Association, 5: 79–92. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Hirschman, A. O. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development, 98–119. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Isard, W. 1951. Interregional and regional input–output analysis: a model of space-economy. Review of Economics and Statistics, 33: 318–328. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Isard, W. and Langford, T. W. 1971. Regional Input–Output Study: Recollections, Reflections, and Diverse Notes on the Philadelphia Experience, Cambridge: Massachusetts: The MIT Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Israilevich, P. R. and Mahidhara, R. 1991. Hog butchers no longer: 20 years of employment change in metropolitan Chicago. Economic Perspectives of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 15: 2–13. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Jackson, R. W. and West, G. R. 1989. “Perspectives on probabilistic input–output analysis”. In Frontiers of Input–Output Analysis, Edited by: Miller, R. E., Polenske, K. R. and Rose, A. Z. 209–221. New York: Oxford University Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Jensen, R. C. and McGaurr, D. 1976. Reconciliation of purchases and sales estimates in an input–output table. Urban Studies, 13: 59–65. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Jensen, R. C. and West, G. R. 1980. The effects of relative coefficient size on input–output multipliers. Environment and Planning A, 12: 659–670. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Jensen, R. C., Mandeville, T. D. and Karunaratne, N. D. 1979. Regional Economic Planning: Generation of Regional Input–Output Analysis, London: Croom Helm. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Jilek, J. 1971. The selection of the most important input coefficients. Economic Bulletin for Europe, 23: 86–105. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Jones, L. P. 1976. The measurement of Hirschmanian linkages. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90: 323–333. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Kymn, K. O. 1990. Aggregation in input–output models: a comprehensive review, 1946–71. Economic Systems Research, 2: 65–93. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Lahr, M. L. RAS or RPC?: An experimental comparison of two nonsurvey techniques for estimating regional input–output relationships. Paper presented at the 25th Meeting of the Southern Regional Science Association. 27 March, Atlanta. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Leontief, W. W. 1955. “Some basic problems of empirical input–output analysis”. In Input–Output Analysis: An Appraisal, 9–22. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Loviscek, A. L. 1982. Industrial cluster analysis—backward or forward linkages?. Annals of Regional Science, 16: 36–47. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | McGilvray, J. W. 1977. “Linkages, key sectors and development strategy”. In Structure, System and Economic Policy, Edited by: Leontief, W. 49–56. New York: Cambridge University Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Meller, P. and Marfán, M. 1981. Small and large industry: employment generation, linkages, and key sectors. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 29: 263–274. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Miernyk, W. H. 1968. Long-range forecasting with a regional input–output model. Western Economic Journal, 6: 165–176. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Miemyk, W. H. 1970. “Sampling techniques in making regional industry forecasts”. In Applications of Input–Output Analysis: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Input–Output Techniques, Edited by: Carter, A. P. and Brody, A. Vol. 2, 305–321. Amsterdam: North-Holland. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Miernyk, W. H. 1976. Comments on recent developments in regional input–output analysis. International Regional Science Review, l: 47–55. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Miernyk, W. H. 1979. Reply to reconciling reconciliation procedures in regional input–output analysis. International Regional Science Review, 4: 36–38. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Miller, R. E. 1966. Interregional feedback effects in input–output models: some preliminary results. Papers, Regional Science Association, 17: 105–125. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Miller, R. E. and Blair, P. D. 1985. Input–Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Morimoto, Y. 1971. A note on weighted aggregation in input–output analysis. International Economic Review, 12: 119–126. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Oosterhaven, J. 1988. On the plausibility of the supply-driven input–output model. Journal of Regional Science, 28: 203–217. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Paelinck, J., de Caevel, J. and Degueldre, J. 1965. “Analyse quantitative de certaines phènoménes du developpment regional polarise: essai de simulation statique d'iteraires de propogation, in: Bibliotèque de l'Institut de Science Économique, No. 7”. In Problèmes de Conversion Économique: Analyses Théretiques et Études Appliquées, 341–387. Paris: M.-Th. Génin. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Park, S.H., Mohtadi, M. and Kubursi, A. 1981. Errors in regional nonsuwey input–output models:analytical and simulation results. Journal of Regional Science, 21: 321–339. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Perroux, F. 1955. Note sur la notion de pôle de croissance. Economie Appliquée, 8: 307–320. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Phibbs, P. J. and Holsman, A. J. 1982. Estimating input–output multipliers—a new hybrid approach. Environment and Planning A, 14: 335–342. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Ralston, S. N., Hastings, S. E. and Brucker, S. M. 1986. Improving regional IO models: evidence against uniform regional purchase coefficients across rows. Annals of Regional Science, 20: 65–80. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Rao, V. and Harmston, F. K. 1979. Identification of key sectors in a region of a developed economy. Annals of Regional Science, 13: 78–90. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Rasmussen, P. N. 1957. Studies in Inter-Sectoral Relations, 126–149. Amsterdam: North Holland. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Regional Science Research Institute. 1975. Fore River Bridge Reconstruction: Technical Evaluation, Vol. 4, Boston: Executive Office of Manpower Affairs, Department of Public Works, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Richardson, H. W. 1985. Input–output and economic base multipliers: looking backward and forward. Journal of Regional Science, 25: 607–661. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Sawyer, C. H. and Miller, R. E. 1983. Experiments in regionalization of national input–output tables. Environment and Planning A, 15: 1501–1520. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Schaffer, W. A., with the assistance of Laurant, E. A., Floyd, C. F., Sutter, E. M. Jr., Hamby, C. K. and Herbert, R. C. 1976. On the Use of Input–Output Models for Regional Planning, Leiden, , The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff. with the assistance of E. A. Laurent, C. F. Floyd, E. M. Sutter, Jr., C. K. Hamby, and R. C. Herbert |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Schintke, J. and Stäglin, R. 1988. “Important input costs in market transaction tables and production flow tables”. In Input–Output Analysis: Current Developments, Edited by: Ciaschini, M. 43–60. London: Chapman & Hall. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Schultz, S. 1976. “Intersectoral comparisons as an approach to the identification of key sectors”. In Advances in Input–Output Analysis, Edited by: Polenske, K.R. and Skolka, J. V. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Schultz, S. 1977. Approaches to identifying key sectors empirically by means of input–output analysis. Journal of Development Studies, 14: 77–96. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Sell, A. 1980. Zur empirischen Ermittlung strategischer Sektoren unter Verwendung der Input–Output-Technik. Jahrbuch für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 195: 457–470. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Shen, T. Y. 1960. An input–output table with regional weights. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 6: 113–119. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Sherman, J. and Momson, W. J. 1949. (Abstract) Adjustment of an inverse matrix corresponding to changes in elements of a given column or row of the original matrix. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 20: 621 |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Sherman, J. and Morrison, W. J. 1950. Adjustment of an inverse matrix corresponding to a change in one element of a given matrix. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21: 124–127. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Stevens, B. H. 1988. Comments on ‘Ready-made’ input–output model systems: model accuracy and the value of limited surveys. Review of Regional Studies, 17: 17–20. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Stevens, B. H. 1990. “A note on the usefulness of the ‘round-by-round’ method of performing input–output impact calculations”. In Dynamics and Conflict in Regional Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Walter Isard, Edited by: Chatterji, M. and Kuenne, R. E. Vol. 2, 279–289. London: The Macmillan Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Stevens, B. H. and Trainer, G. A. 1980. “The generation of error in regional input–output analysis and its implications for non-survey models”. In Economic Impact Analysis, Edited by: Pleeter, S. 68–84. Amsterdam: Martinus-Nijhoff. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Stevens, B. H., Treyz, G. I. and Lahr, M. L. 1989. “On the comparative accuracy of RPC estimating techniques”. In Frontiers in Input–Output Analysis, Edited by: Miller, R. E., Polenske, K. R. and Rose, A. Z. 245–257. New York: Oxford University Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Strassert, G. 1968. Zur Bestimmung stratischer Sektoren mit Hilfe von Input–Output Modellen. Jahrbucher für nationalökonomie und Statistik, 182: 211–215. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Szyrmer, J. M. 1986. Measuring connectedness of input–output models: 2. Total flow concept. Environment and Planning A, 18: 107–121. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Szyrmer, J. M. 1992. Input–output coefficients and multipliers from a total flow perspective. Environment and Planning A, 24: 921–937. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | West, G. R. 1980. Generation of regional input–output tables (GRIT): an introspection. Economic Analysis and Policy, 10: 71–86. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | West, G. R. 1981. An efficient approach to the estimation of regional input–output tables. Environment and Planning A, 13: 857–867. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | West, G. R. 1982. Sensitivity and key sector analysis in input–output models. Australian Economic Papers, 21: 365–378. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | West, G. R. 1990. Regional trade estimation: a hybrid approach. International Regional Science Review, 13: 103–118. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | West, G. R., Morison, J. B. and Jensen, R. C. 1984. A method for the estimation of hybrid interregional input—output tables. Regional Studies, 18: 413–422. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Williamson, R. B. 1970. Simple input–output models for area analysis. Land Economics, 46: 333–338. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Woodbury, M. A. 1950. “Inverting modified matrices”. In Memorandum Report 42, Statistical Research Group, Princeton University. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Xu, S. and Madden, M. 1991. “The concept of important coefficients in input–output models”. In Regional Input–Output Modelling, Edited by: LlDewhurst, J. H., Hewings, G. J. D. and Jensen, R. C. 66–97. Avebury: Brookfield, Massachusetts. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Yershof, E. B. 1965. “Chapter 3”. In Planning Methods of the Input–Output Proportions Moscow |
